The mouse Mid1 gene: implications for the pathogenesis of Opitz syndrome and the evolution of the mammalian pseudoautosomal region

We have recently reported isolation of the gene responsible for X- linked Opitz G/BBB syndrome, a defect of midline development. MID1 is located on the distal short arm of the human X chromosome (Xp22. 3) and encodes a novel member of the B box family of zinc finger proteins. We have now cloned the murine homolog of MID1 and performed preliminary expression studies during development. Mid1 expression in undifferentiated cells in the central nervous, gastrointestinal and urogenital systems suggests that abnormal cell proliferation may underlie the defect in midline development characteristic of Opitz syndrome. We have also found that Mid1 is located within the mouse pseudoautosomal region (PAR) in Mus musculus , while it seems to be X- specific in Mus spretus. Therefore, Mid1 is likely to be a recent acquisition of the M. musculus PAR. Genetic and FISH analyses also demonstrated a high frequency of unequal crossovers in the murine PAR, creating spontaneous deletion/duplication events involving Mid1. These data provide evidence for the first time that genetic instability of the PAR may affect functionally important genes. In addition, we show that MID1 is the first example of a gene subject to X-inactivation in man while escaping it in mouse. These data contribute to a better understanding of the molecular content and evolution of the rodent PAR.      

Recommendations for reporting results of diagnostic genetic testing (biochemical,cytogenetic and molecular genetic)

Genetic test results can have considerable importance for patients, their parents and more remote family members. Clinical therapy and surveillance, reproductive decisions and genetic diagnostics in family members, including prenatal diagnosis, are based on these results. The genetic test report should therefore provide a clear, concise, accurate, fully interpretative and authoritative answer to the clinical question. The need for harmonizing reporting practice of genetic tests has been recognised by the External Quality Assessment (EQA), providers and laboratories. The ESHG Genetic Services Quality Committee has produced reporting guidelines for the genetic disciplines (biochemical, cytogenetic and molecular genetic). These guidelines give assistance on report content, including the interpretation of results. Selected examples of genetic test reports for all three disciplines are provided in an annexe.Diagnostic genetic testing is an extremely rapidly expanding area encompassing a broad range of laboratory investigations to analyse chromosomes (from classical karyotype to molecular cytogenetics), nucleic acids (DNA, RNA), proteins and metabolites used to detect heritable or somatic mutations, genotypes or phenotypes related to disease and health. Genetic testing requires particular consideration in that it is usually performed only once in a patient''s lifetime, and the results may have considerable importance for lifetime decisions not only for the individuals being tested but also for children and family. Interpreting and reporting variation in germline chromosomes, DNA sequences or their products is a heavy clinical responsibility for prediction of susceptibility to disease, patient diagnosis, prognosis, counselling, treatment or family planning. Providing a set of reporting frameworks that can be customised for different testing contexts but share some common principles could be beneficial to the practice of a number of laboratories, including non-OECD members and/or laboratories that do not participate in External Quality Assessments (EQA), and to laboratories with blurred boundaries between research and genetic testing services.Although several guidelines already exist for reporting the results of genetic testing,^1,2,3 these focus on molecular genetic testing and do not cover the other two branches of laboratory genetics, namely biochemical genetics and cytogenetics. Based on recent surveys of EQA results presented by some European EQA providers and the request from genetic laboratories for comprehensive reporting guidelines, it was considered that a unifying attempt to harmonise the reporting practice of genetic tests in Europe and neighbouring countries would be welcome.     

MEF2C deletions and mutations versus duplications: A clinical comparison

5q14.3 deletions including the MEF2C gene have been identified to date using genomic arrays in patients with severe developmental delay or intellectual disability, stereotypic behavior, epilepsy, cerebral malformations and a facial gestalt not really distinctive though characterized by broad and/or high, bulging forehead, upslanting palpebral fissures, flat nasal root and bridge, small, upturned nose, hypotonic small mouth resulting in cupid bow/tented upper lip. MEF2C mutations have been also identified in patients with overlapping phenotype so that it is considered the gene responsible for the 5q14.3 deletion syndrome. To date, one single duplication including MEF2C has been reported in a patient with intellectual disability but its clinical significance remains uncertain also because of the large size of the imbalance. Here we present two further patients with 5q14.3 duplications including MEF2C. Their phenotype indeed suggest the pathogenic effect of the MEF2C duplication although other duplicated genes also brain expressed might contribute to the clinical features. In none of them a clear-cut syndrome can be identified. A comparison between MEF2C deleted/mutated and duplicated patients is also presented.     

A 2.3 Mb duplication of chromosome 8q24.3 associated with severe mental retardation and epilepsy detected by standard karyotype

Chromosome duplications are found in about 2% of subjects with a typical chromosomal phenotype but their frequency is likely to be higher, as suggested by the first array-CGH data. According to the orientation of the duplicated segment, duplications may be in tandem or inverted. The latter are usually associated with a distal deletion. We studied a de novo 2.3 Mb inverted duplication of 8q24.3 without apparently associated deletion in a subject with profound psychomotor retardation, idiopathic epilepsy and growth delay. In spite of its small size, the presence of the rearrangement was suspected on standard karyotypes (approximately 400 bands) and later confirmed by Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis. We hypothesize that the GRINA gene, a glutamate binding subunit of NMDA receptor ion channel lying within the duplicated segment, may be responsible for the epilepsy. This paper confirms that small subtelomeric de novo duplications may be responsible for mental retardation, facial dysmorphisms and/or congenital malformations, although their presence may be overlooked by FISH analysis.     

Correlation between genomic alterations assessed by array comparative genomic hybridization, prognostically informative histologic subtype, stage, and patient survival in gastric cancer

It is difficult to evaluate the prognostic value of histologic criteria in gastric cancer because of the high variability of morphologic patterns. Recently, histologic subtypes of low, intermediate, or high malignant potential have been identified, providing the basis for a prognostically informative grading system. Because array comparative genomic hybridization systems allow systematic analysis of chromosome alterations, which may be prognostically and pathogenetically informative, we applied high-resolution genome-wide array comparative genomic hybridization to archival material from 81 gastric cancer cases followed for a median of 150 months after surgery. The DNA extracted from paraffin sections gave useful results in 49 tumors, 18 of which were of low-grade, 24 of intermediate, and 7 of high-grade histotypes. Based on the number of chromosome aberrations and the presence/absence of amplifications, 3 tumor clusters of increasing genomic lesion severity were constructed, which proved to correlate significantly with histologic grade and stage as well as with patient survival. Further investigation documented the lower number and severity of genomic alterations in tumors with microsatellite DNA instability and high CD8-rich lymphoid response; the close association of 8p23.1 amplification with cardial cancer; the frequent amplification of genes involved in cell renewal (CDC6, HER2, GRB7, IGFBP4) at 17q12-q21.1, with close histochemical correlation with HER2 membranous expression; and more sporadic amplification of chromosome regions harboring important oncogenes like MYC, KRAS, NRAS, CRKL, CCNE1, or ZNF217. We conclude that genome-wide array comparative genomic hybridization of gastric cancer contributes prognostically relevant information providing a genetic background for histologic grading.