Le traitement du signal en électromyographie: mise au point

Automatic analysis of electromyography (EMG) signals, first operated in 1950 with analogic machines, steeply expanded from 1980 when fast computers and worthwhile programs became available. On-line measurement of response area and latency, averaging of low amplitude waves, fast sorting of motor unit potential shape parameters, computation of the “jitter” between two muscle fibers, turns/amplitude and spectral analysis of interferential pattern records, are some examples of programs currently offered in modern EMG machines. Other techniques are still reserved for research purposes: scanning EMG, decomposition of nerve and muscle compound potentials, measurement of the threshold and firing rate of motor units, trace analysis using tracking models. Finally, the credit for artificial intelligence systems (knowledge based systems, fuzzy logic, neuronal networks) is still not clearly stated.     

Fas receptor expression on B-lineage cells

Mice homozygous for the lpr mutation have B and T cell defects and develop autoantibodies, suggesting that lpr plays a role in their genesis. The lpr defect has been identified as a mutation in the apoptosis-associated Fas receptor (FasR) gene. To begin to define the role of FasR in B cells, we have surveyed FasR expression on B-lineage cells from early progenitors in the bone marrow through their maturation in the periphery. Contrary to some reports, we found that FasR is expressed on B cells at all stages of their development and is highest on germinal center B cells. FasR is not expressed on lpr/lpr-derived cells. These data are consistent with the idea that lpr/lpr mice have an intrinsic B cell defect that may be manifested in developing as well as peripheral B cells. An unexpected finding is that B-1 (CD5) B cells do not constitutively express FasR: FasR becomes detectable on B-1 B cells only after activation.     

Emergence and scattering of multiple neurofibromatosis (NF1)-related sequences during hominoid evolution suggest a process of pericentromeric interchromosomal transposition

Type 1 neurofibromatosis (NF1) gene encodes for a member of the GTPase activating protein family and is considered to be a tumor suppressor gene. Its very high rate of de novo mutation in humans led us to study a specific feature of this gene: the presence of numerous NF1-related sequences. According to our results, the human genome contains at least 11 NF1-related sequences, nine of which are scattered near centromeric sequences of seven different chromosomes. These NF1-related sequences, whose extent is quite varied according to loci, are unprocessed copies of the NF1 gene, and bear numerous mutations. A phylogenetic analysis of the six largest sequences indicates that they are all derived from a common ancestor, which would have appeared 22-33 million years ago, and was subsequently duplicated several times during hominoid evolution. The most recent duplication and interchromosomal transposition occurred in the last million years suggesting that the process could still be ongoing. Intriguing similarities between the evolution of alpha- satellite DNA and NF1-related sequences suggest the involvement of a common genetic mechanism for the generation and pericentric spreading of these NF1 partial copies.      

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: rationale for the technique of percutaneous in situ fixation

In pinning a slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE), the position of the pin within the center of the femoral head is important for two reasons. The pin may disrupt the lateral epiphyseal artery and cause avascular necrosis (AVN), or pin penetration in certain locations may go unrecognized on radiographs. To place the pin accurately, the surgeon must be aware of where the femoral head lies in relation to the femoral neck and the shaft. Radiographs of models and of patients in various positions support the view that the femoral head in most cases of chronic SCFE rotates around the axis of the femoral neck and does not slip inferiorly. Therefore, the starting point for an in situ fixation device is the anterior femoral neck, the exact location depending on the amount of slipping.     

Morphine place conditioning is differentially affected by CCKA and CCKB receptor antagonists.

In the present study we have examined the interaction between the selective cholecystokinin (CCK)A and CCKB receptor antagonists, devazepide and L365-260 on morphine conditioned place preference (CPP). Using an unbiased procedure, morphine (1.5 mg/kg) produced a reliable CPP which was observed irrespective of the conditioning compartment type. Pretreatment with devazepide (0.001-0.01 mg/kg s.c.) produced a dose related attenuation of this response. At higher doses (0.1-1 mg/kg) this antagonism became variable and dependent on the training compartment with blockade only observed when conditioning was to the white/rough textured environment. This profile has also been reported for the serotonin (5-HT)3 receptor antagonist ondansetron. The CCKB antagonist L365-260 (0.000001-0.01 mg/kg) failed to antagonize the morphine CPP, if anything a mild potentiation was observed. To study this further we examined the interaction between L365-260 (0.01 mg/kg) and a subthreshold dose of morphine (0.3 mg/kg). At these doses neither drug elicited CPP, however when co-administered a significant CPP was recorded. Finally, L365-260 at 1 mg/kg induced a mild but significant CPP when administered alone. These results suggest a differential role of CCK receptor subtypes on reward-related behaviour and complement previous studies suggesting bimodal effects of CCK systems on mesolimbic dopamine function.