Comparative effects of ethanol on motor activity and operant behavior.

Ethanol effects on two types of motor activity and on lever responding for food delivered on a fixed-ratio 20 (FR 20) reinforcement schedule were compared using C57BL/6 (C57) mice. Low doses of ethanol (1-2 g/kg) transiently elevated horizontal activity and high doses (2.5 and 3.0 g/kg) reduced this behavior throughout testing with a slight recovery toward the end of a 16-min test period. In contrast, similar ethanol doses produced a monotonic reduction in both vertical activity and lever responding for food under the FR 20 schedule. The ethanol-induced reduction in FR 20 lever responding was less prolonged than the reduction in vertical activity but was more prolonged than the reduction in horizontal activity. Because vertical activity and lever responding for food delivered on the FR 20 schedule were never elevated, were reduced at ethanol doses that either stimulated or depressed horizontal activity, and were unaffected by low ethanol doses that did not affect horizontal activity, it is unlikely that either are sensitive to the stimulatory effects of ethanol. Accountable mechanisms for the different effects of ethanol on the three behaviors are unknown; however, the present study eliminates ethanol dose, postinjection time, testing time, and food deprivation condition as possible reasons for the differences.     

Effects of Ro 15-4513 and ethanol on operant behavior of male and female C57BL/6 mice.

Although the partial benzodiazepine receptor inverse agonist, Ro 15-4513, counteracts many ethanol effects, its effect on operant behavior or on ethanol-induced changes in this behavior, remains controversial. In this study, we examined the effects of Ro 15-4513, ethanol, and their interaction on behavior maintained by an FR 20 schedule of food reinforcement. Ro 15-4513 (1.0-4.0 mg/kg) and ethanol (1.5-3.0 g/kg) reduced lever-responding of both male and female mice. The disruptive effect of Ro 15-4513 was of short duration (approximately 10 min), and was greater in male than in female mice. Under equivalent dose and time parameters, ethanol disrupted behavior of both sexes to the same extent. In spite of the disruptive effects of both drugs when given alone, when given after ethanol and prior to testing, Ro 15-4513 attenuated the disruptive effects of ethanol in male mice. The present study extends previous reports by documenting: (1) that the disruptive effect of Ro 15-4513 on mice is of very short duration and occurs at lower doses than previously reported; (2) that, in spite of being disruptive itself, Ro 15-4513 can attenuate the disruptive effects of ethanol on schedule controlled behavior; and (3) that gender is an important consideration in determining the effects of this compound.     

Working conditions and health behavior as causes of educational inequalities in self-rated health: an inverse odds weighting approach

Objective:Using a novel mediation method that presents unbiased results even in the presence of exposure–mediator interactions, this study estimated the extent to which working conditions and health behaviors contribute to educational inequalities in self-rated health in the workforce.Methods:Respondents of the longitudinal Survey of Health, Ageing, and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) in 16 countries were selected, aged 50–64 years, in paid employment at baseline and with information on education and self-rated health (N=15 028). Education, health behaviors [including body mass index (BMI)] and working conditions were measured at baseline and self-rated health at baseline and two-year follow-up. Causal mediation analysis with inverse odds weighting was used to estimate the total effect of education on self-rated health, decomposed into a natural direct effect (NDE) and natural indirect effect (NIE).Results:Lower educated workers were more likely to perceive their health as poor than higher educated workers [relative risk (RR) 1.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.37–1.60]. They were also more likely to have unfavorable working conditions and unhealthy behaviors, except for alcohol consumption. When all working conditions were included, the remaining NDE was RR 1.30 (95% CI 1.15–1.44). When BMI and health behaviors were included, the remaining NDE was RR 1.40 (95% CI 1.27–1.54). Working conditions explained 38% and health behaviors and BMI explained 16% of educational inequalities in health. Including all mediators explained 64% of educational inequalities in self-rated health.Conclusions:Working conditions and health behaviors explain over half of the educational inequalities in self-rated health. To reduce health inequalities, improving working conditions seems to be more important than introducing health promotion programs in the workforce.