Application of the adverse outcome pathway framework to genotoxic modes of action

In May 2017, the Health and Environmental Sciences Institute's Genetic Toxicology Technical Committee hosted a workshop to discuss whether mode of action (MOA) investigation is enhanced through the application of the adverse outcome pathway (AOP) framework. As AOPs are a relatively new approach in genetic toxicology, this report describes how AOPs could be harnessed to advance MOA analysis of genotoxicity pathways using five example case studies. Each of these genetic toxicology AOPs proposed for further development includes the relevant molecular initiating events, key events, and adverse outcomes (AOs), identification and/or further development of the appropriate assays to link an agent to these events, and discussion regarding the biological plausibility of the proposed AOP. A key difference between these proposed genetic toxicology AOPs versus traditional AOPs is that the AO is a genetic toxicology endpoint of potential significance in risk characterization, in contrast to an adverse state of an organism or a population. The first two detailed case studies describe provisional AOPs for aurora kinase inhibition and tubulin binding, leading to the common AO of aneuploidy. The remaining three case studies highlight provisional AOPs that lead to chromosome breakage or mutation via indirect DNA interaction (inhibition of topoisomerase II, production of cellular reactive oxygen species, and inhibition of DNA synthesis). These case studies serve as starting points for genotoxicity AOPs that could ultimately be published and utilized by the broader toxicology community and illustrate the practical considerations and evidence required to formalize such AOPs so that they may be applied to genetic toxicity evaluation schemes. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 61:114–134, 2020. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

The use of the monoclonal antibody Ki-67 in the identification of proliferating cells: application to surgical neuropathology

In order to test its potential application to surgical neuropathology, the monoclonal antibody Ki-67 was used to demonstrate immunohistochemically the proliferating cells in 40 neoplasms of the nervous system. The antibody, which reacts with a nuclear protein expressed in the G1, G2, S, and M phases of the cell cycle, was demonstrated in frozen sections of all lesions. The highest incidence of stained nuclei was found in a metastatic carcinoma (57%). The percentage of stained cells in gliomas was in general agreement with the histologic grade and known biologic behavior of the lesions, ranging from 0.6% in a pilocytic astrocytoma to 12.4% in a glioblastoma multiforme. In the fibrillary astrocytic neoplasms of low cellularity, there were good correlations between the percentages of stained cells and the degrees of nuclear pleomorphism and chromatin density. In meningiomas, schwannomas, and a cerebellar hemangioblastoma, the fractions of labeled nuclei were less than 1%. The percentage of stained cells in pituitary adenomas showed considerable variation among the four cases (0.2-1.5%), the biologic significance of which is unknown. In four of the above cases, Ki-67 staining was performed on air-dried squash preparations with excellent visualization of immunoreactive nuclei. In one case, a hemangioblastoma, no stained nuclei were seen. The results confirm that Ki-67 staining is technically suitable as a diagnostic method, with good correlations between frozen sections and smear preparations. Determination of the replicating cell fraction could become an important additional criterion to predict the biologic behavior of nervous system neoplasms.     

Monotherapy with enoxaparin for the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism.

This study aimed to determine whether a weight-adjusted dose of subcutaneous enoxaparin is as effective and safe as oral acenocoumarol for the secondary prophylaxis of pulmonary embolism. Three hundred and eighty consecutive noncancer outpatients hospitalized with an episode of symptomatic pulmonary embolism selected treatment with acenocoumarol or enoxaparin at a dose of 1 mg/kg once daily after being informed of the type of administration and expected frequency of laboratory monitoring for both medicinal products. Endpoints were symptomatic recurrent thromboembolic events evaluated by standard objective testing, and a composite endpoint of recurrent venous thromboembolism, major bleeding, and death from any cause. One hundred and ninety-nine patients (52%) chose acenocoumarol therapy and 181 chose enoxaparin monotherapy. Four patients in the enoxaparin group (2.2%) and six patients in the acenocoumarol group (3%) had an objective thromboembolic recurrence (hazard ratio, 1.35; 95% confidence interval, 0.38-4.79; P = 0.64). Nine patients in the enoxaparin group (5.0%) had a hemorrhagic complication compared with 11 in the acenocoumarol group (5.5%) (P = 0.81). The hospital length of stay was shorter with enoxaparin compared with acenocoumarol (11 versus 16 days, P = 0.0001). Enoxaparin is as effective and safe as acenocoumarol in the secondary prevention of recurrent thromboembolic disease and is associated with shorter hospitalization.