Analysis of renal function in the immediate postoperative period after partial liver transplantation.

Although renal dysfunction is common after liver transplantation, postoperative renal function after split liver transplantation (SLT) has not been well studied. Renal function immediately after surgery was analyzed retrospectively in 16 patients that received a SLT (SLT group). The results were compared with corresponding data from 31 matched patients that received a full-size liver transplant (FSLT group) during the same period. Serum creatinine (SCr) was measured before surgery, and, after transplantation, daily during the first week and at days 14, 21, and 28. Renal dysfunction (RD) was defined as the requirement for renal replacement therapy (RRT) or a 100% increase in SCr if the basal value had been <1.0 mg/dL or a 50% increase in SCr if the basal value had been >1.0 mg/dL. SCr had to be at least 1.5 mg/dL for a diagnosis of RD to be considered. The classification of RD was: mild, SCr 1.5-2.4 mg/dL; moderate, SCr 2.5-4.0 mg/dL; or severe, SCr >4.0 mg/dL (the requirement for RRT). Both donor and recipient age and cold ischemia time were lower in the SLT group than in the FSLT group (P < 0.05). Length of surgery was longer in the SLT group (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between groups with respect to Model for End-Stage Liver Disease scores, the need for transfusions, the length of admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), survival rate, individual severity index, or sepsis-related organ failure assessment scores at the time of diagnosing RD. Immunosuppression regimens were similar in both groups. RD developed in 82% of SLT patients, but in only 58% of FSLT patients (P = not significant [NS]). Among SLT patients, RD (23.0% mild, 15.5% moderate, and 61.5% severe) was more severe (P = 0.007) than in FSLT patients (63.1% mild, 15.8% moderate, and 24.1% severe). The requirement for RRT in the SLT group (43.7%) was significantly greater (P < 0.05) than that in the FSLT group (12.9%). This finding may be due to the different incidence of sepsis in the 2 groups (SLT 37.5% vs. FSLT 9.7%; P < 0.05). In conclusion, although the number of patients studied was small, our data suggest a higher incidence of RD and a greater requirement for RRT in patients that receive a split liver graft than in those that receive a full size liver graft.     

Echogenic Appearance of Colorectal Liver Metastases on Intraoperative Ultrasonography is Associated with Survival After Hepatic Resection

Survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases has traditionally been associated with clinicopathologic factors. We sought to investigate whether echogenicity of colorectal liver metastasis as assessed by intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) was a prognostic factor after hepatic resection. Prospective data on tumor IOUS appearance were collected in 84 patients who underwent hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastasis. Images were digitally recorded, blindly reviewed, and scored for echogenicity (hypo-, iso-, or hyperechoic). The median tumor number was 1 and the median tumor size was 5.0 cm. At the time of surgery, the IOUS appearance of the colorectal liver metastases were hypoechoic in 35 (41.7%) patients, isoechoic in 37 (44.0%) patients, and hyperechoic in 12 (14.3%) patients. Traditional clinicopathologic prognostic factors were similarly distributed among the three echogenicity groups (all p > 0.05). Patients with a hypoechoic lesion had a significantly shorter median survival (30.2 months) compared with patients who had either an isoechoic (53.2 months) or hyperechoic (42.3 months) lesion (p = 0.005). The 5-year survival after hepatic resection of colorectal liver metastasis was also associated with the echogenic appearance of the lesion (hypoechoic 14.4 vs isoechoic 37.4 vs hyperechoic 46.2%) (p < 0.05). Intraoperative ultrasound echogenicity should be considered a prognostic factor after hepatic resection of metastatic colorectal cancer. This study was presented at the 47th annual meeting of The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 22 May 2006.     

The necessity for sphenoidal electrodes in the presurgical evaluation of temporal lobe epilepsy: pro position.

Whether sphenoidal electrodes should be used in the presurgical evaluation of people with refractory epilepsy has remained controversial. Many studies have been published touting their advantages, or conversely, their lack of benefit. The present paper reviews the evidence supporting the utility of sphenoidal electrodes. In principle, sphenoidal electrodes have an advantage over laterally placed scalp electrodes in detecting inferiorly directed mesial temporal discharges. Published studies demonstrate that sphenoidal electrodes are more sensitive than scalp electrodes and sometimes detect interictal spikes and seizures not seen with scalp electrodes. While the net added yield is relatively low, perhaps 5 to 10%, those patients in whom sphenoidal electrodes provide unique localizing information have much to gain. Sphenoidal electrodes may spare some patients unnecessary intracranial electrode investigation and permit surgery for others.     

Evaluation of Class I ART restorations in Brazilian schoolchildren: three-year results

Atraumetic Restorative Treatment (ART) has been adopted around the world to avoid unnecessary extractions, especially in non-industrialized countries The development of specific glass ionomer cements marketed for the ART technique has contributed to the technical success rate. In this study. Ketac-Molar^a (3M ESPE. Dental Medzn Germany) was used to restore 150 Class I cavities in 118 Brazilian public school children, aged from 7–12 years. At baseline and at subsequent recalls. CPI probes with a ball-end of 0.5 millimeters (mm) were used to assess loss of restorative material, and photographic color transparencies of restorations were made. After six months. 83 patients returned for follow-up examinations, with 71.8% of their restorations designated as acceptable. After three years. 49 patients with 57 ART-restorations were evaluated, with 21.0% of these restorations graded as acceptable Another 29.8% of their restorations had been replaced by more permanent materials. The main objective of the ART technique is tooth retention; this was achieved for 94.7% of the restored teeth in a high caries risk population who returned for recalls.     

A simple method for determining metronidazole resistance of Helicobacter pylori.

The reliability of methods for determination of Helicobacter pylori resistance to metronidazole has been found to depend upon the incubation time. Because the disk diffusion method is more vulnerable than other methods to prolonged incubation, this method has not been recommended for H. pylori. However, because media designed for rapid growth of H. pylori have been introduced, the time has come to look at the clinical usefulness of this inexpensive and simple method again. The correlation of readings obtained with the E test (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden) and Rosco's (Taastrup, Denmark) disk diffusion method for in vitro metronidazole resistance determination for H. pylori with a short incubation time (24 to 31 h) was studied. Plates which could not be read after 24 to 31 h were reincubated for another night. Fifty-seven consecutive clinical strains were tested. Because the rate of regrowth of H. pylori depends upon the age of the colonies inoculated, the reproducibility of resistance test results for young colonies versus old colonies was also studied. Resistance plates could be read after 24 to 31 h of incubation for 28 of 29 strains when the inoculum consisted of young colonies (3 to 4 days old). For these 29 strains, a high correlation (r = -0.937) was found between results obtained with the E test and those obtained with the disk diffusion test. A poorer correlation was found for old colonies (> or = 5 days old) (r = -0.742), which required a prolonged incubation for 8 of 23 strains. In conclusion, short incubation was successfully applied with young colonies. Results obtained with the simple and inexpensive disk diffusion method correlated well with those obtained with the E test.     

An HLA-DRB α-helix motif shared by DR11 and DR8 alleles is implicated in the pluriallelic restriction of peptide-specific T-cell lines

The T-cell recognition of HLA-DR-peptide complexes is generally restricted by the polymorphism of the DRB molecules but pluriallelic restriction has been described. The molecular basis of restriction and promiscuity of such peptide-specific responses is poorly understood. We isolated a panel of T-cell lines specific for the tetanus toxin peptide p2 (TT830-843) exhibiting pluriallelic restriction by DR11 and DR8 alleles. Fine restriction specificity of the T-cell lines was examined in functional assays against DR oligotyped APCs expressing different variants of DR11 and DR8 alleles. Our results show that (a) polymorphisms between serologically related alleles are relevant in terms of restriction of the peptide-specific T-cell response; in some instances, a single amino acid substitution can determine the restriction of a T-cell line; (b) different patterns of restriction are not the result of specific differences in DR-p2 binding as p2 peptide binds to all DR11 and DR8 alleles tested (DRB1^* 1101, -1102, -1103, -1104, 110X, -0801, -0802, -0803, and -0806); and (c) pluriallelic restriction of the peptide-specific T-cell responses correlates with the presence of a DRB1 α-helix motif (67-71-86) shared by some DR11 and DR8 alleles. Possible implications of pluriallelic restriction of peptide-specific T-cell response in autoimmune disorders associated with DR11 and DR8 are discussed.     

Incidence and Management of Chyle Leaks Following Pancreatic Resection: A High Volume Single-Center Institutional Experience

Background   No data on incidence, management, or natural history of chyle leaks following pancreatic resection have been published. We sought to identify possible risk factors associated with chyle leaks following pancreatic resection, as well as determine the natural history of this rare complication. Methods   Between 1993 and 2008, 3,532 patients underwent pancreatic resection at a single institution. Data on demographics, operative details, primary tumor status, and chyle leak were collected. To identify risk factors associated with chyle leak, a matched 3:1 paired analysis was performed. Results   Of 3,532 patients undergoing pancreatic resection, 47 (1.3%) developed a chyle leak (n = 34, contained chyle leak versus n = 13, diffuse chylous ascites). Chyle leak was identified at median 5 days following surgery. Median drain triglyceride levels were 592 ng/dl. After matching on tumor size, disease etiology, and resection type, the number of lymph nodes harvested and history of concomitant vascular resection predicted higher risk of chyle leak (both P < 0.05). Total parenteral nutrition (TPN) was required in more patients with chylous ascites (92.3%) than those with chyle leaks (44.1%) (P = 0.003). The median time to resolution was shorter for contained chyle leaks (13 days) versus chylous ascites (36 days) (P < 0.001). Patients with chylous ascites tended to have shorter overall survival (3-year, 18.8%) versus patients with no chyle leak (3-year, 46.9%) (P = 0.12). In contrast, patients with a contained chyle leak had a similar survival as patients with no chyle leak (3-year, 53.4% versus 46.9%, respectively) (P = 0.32). Conclusion   Chyle leak was a rare (1.3%) complication following pancreatic resection that was associated with number of lymph nodes harvested and concomitant vascular resection. In general, chyle leaks were successfully managed with TPN with no adverse impact on outcome. Patients with chylous ascites, however, had a more protracted clinical course and tended to have a worse long-term survival. Presented at the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 49th Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA, May 18th, 2008 Support: Dr. Pawlik is supported by Grant Number 1KL2RR025006-01 from the National Center for Research Resources (NCRR), a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and NIH Roadmap for Medical Research. The contents of this publication are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official view of NCRR or NIH.