Glycaemic control for patients with severe acute brain injury: Protocol for a systematic review

Background

Hyperglycaemia is common in patients with acute brain injury admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU). Many studies have found associations between development of hyperglycaemia and increased mortality in hospitalised patients. However, the optimal target for blood glucose control is unknown. We want to conduct a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis to explore the beneficial and harmful effects of restrictive versus liberal glucose control on patient outcomes in adults with severe acute brain injury.

Methods

We will systematically search medical databases including CENTRAL, Embase, MEDLINE and trial registries. We will search the following websites for ongoing or unpublished trials: http://www.controlled-trials.com/ , http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ , www.eudraCT.com , http://centerwatch.com/ , The Cochrane Library's CENTRAL, PubMed, EMBASE, Science Citation Index Expanded and CINAHL. Two authors will independently review and select trials and extract data. We will include randomised trials comparing levels of glucose control in our analyses and observational studies will be included to address potential harms. The primary outcomes are defined as all-cause mortality, functional outcome and health-related quality of life. Secondary outcomes include serious adverse events including hypoglycaemia, length of ICU stay and duration of mechanical ventilation, and explorative outcomes including intracranial pressure and infection. Trial Sequential Analysis will be used to investigate the risk of type I error due to repetitive testing and to further explore imprecision. Quality of trials will be evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, and quality of evidence will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach.

Discussion

The results of the systematic review will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication. With the review, we hope to inform future randomised clinical trials and improve clinical practice.     

Sex Disparities in Risk of Mortality Among Children With ESRD

1. Download high-res image (377KB)
2. Download full-size image

     

Comparative toxicity of ethylene dichloride in F344/N, Sprague-Dawley and Osborne-Mendel rats

Studies were conducted to compare the toxicity of ethylene dichloride (EDC) in F344/N rats, Sprague-Dawley rats, and Osborne-Mendel rats. Ten rats/sex/group were exposed to EDC in drinking-water at 0, 500, 1000, 2000, 4000 and 8000 ppm for 13 wk. The highest concentration was limited by the maximum solubility of EDC in water (about 9000 ppm). In addition, F344/N rats (10/sex/group) were administered EDC in corn oil by gavage to compare toxicity resulting from bolus administration with that of continuous exposure in drinking-water. Gavage doses of EDC were within the range of total daily doses (in mg/kg body weight/day) resulting from exposure in drinking-water. EDC administered by gavage resulted in greater toxicity to F344/N rats than did administration of similar doses in drinking-water. All males receiving 240 and 480 mg/kg body weight and 9/10 females receiving 300 mg/kg body weight by gavage died before the end of the study. Necrosis of the cerebellum was observed in the brains of 3 males receiving 240 mg/kg body weight and 3 females receiving 300 mg/kg body weight. Hyperplasia and inflammation of the forestomach mucosa were observed in 8 male and 3 female rats that died or were killed in moribund condition. EDC caused minimal toxicity to F344/N, Sprague-Dawley and Osborne-Mendel rats at the drinking-water concentrations used in these studies; only female F344/N rats had EDC-related renal lesions. Based on mortality and EDC-related lesions, the no-effect levels for EDC administered by gavage to F344/N rats were 120 mg/kg body weight for males and 150 mg/kg body weight for females.