A study to explore the role of a community oncology nurse specialist

Cancer patients are increasingly being cared for in the community. However, the role of the community oncology nurse specialist (CONS) remains a rare appointment in the United Kingdom. There is little research evidence to substantiate the view that this is a worthwhile and effective role. This study aimed to explore the role of one CONS using a qualitative case study approach. The sample consisted of the CONS, seven patients, no relatives and five community nurses. Semi-structured interviews were used to elicit the view of these participants. In addition, documents containing details of the CONS's work to date were reviewed. A number of the CONS's role components were identified by the different respondent groups. Five themes were identified within the data collected: functions of the CONS, communication between the CONS and other health care professionals, structural and organizational factors, characteristics of the service and benefits to patients and their families. Furthermore, all respondent groups were positive about the service offered by the CONS, and felt that the role was valuable. Some negative features were identified and these were concerned with organizational aspects of the service. The findings suggest the need for further research and evaluation in this area.     

Symptomatic and endoscopic duodenal ulcer relapse rates 12 months following Helicobacter pylori eradication treatment with omeprazole and amoxycillin with or without metronidazole

Aim: To determine the effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication with omeprazole and amoxycillin, with or without metronidazole, on the 12-month course of duodenal ulcer disease. Methods: In a randomized, double-blind study, conducted in 19 hospitals, 105 H. pylori positive duodenal ulcer patients were healed and symptom-free following either omeprazole dual therapy (omeprazole 40 mg o.m.+amoxycillin 500 mg t.d.s., OA, eradication rate 46%, n=52) or omeprazole triple therapy (omeprazole 40 mg o.m.+amoxycillin 500 mg t.d.s.+metronidazole 400 mg t.d.s., OAM, eradication rate 92%, n=53) for 2 weeks, followed by 2 weeks of omeprazole 20 mg o.m. and a 12-month untreated follow-up period, after which time all patients were endoscoped. Endoscopic and symptomatic relapse rates, and effect on H. pylori status measured using ¹³C-urea breath test, were determined. Results: During the 12-month untreated follow-up period, the life-table endoscopic relapse rates were 12% (95% CI: 2–22%) and 2% (95% CI: 0–6%) for OA and OAM patients, respectively. By 12 months, life-table symptomatic relapse rates were 22% (95% CI: 13–37%) and 19% (95% CI: 8–30%) for OA and OAM, respectively. In the 12 months untreated follow-up period, 2/69 (3%, 95% CI: 0–7%) patients rendered H. pylori negative had an endoscopic relapse at the end of the 12-month follow-up period, compared with 5/31 (16%, 95% CI: 3–29%) patients remaining H. pylori positive (P=0.03 between H. pylori positive and negative groups). Twelve of 69 (17%, 95% CI: 8–26%) patients rendered H. pylori negative relapsed symptomatically, compared with 9/31 (29%, 95% CI: 13–45%) patients remaining H. pylori positive (P= N.S. between groups). There was a significant improvement in epigastric pain (P=0.0001), nausea and vomiting (P<0.05) between entry to the study and 1, 6 and 12 months post-treatment for both treatment groups. Conclusions: OAM eradicates H. pylori in significantly more patients than OA, but successful H. pylori eradication with either OAM or OA predisposes to low endoscopic and symptomatic relapse rates for duodenal ulcer patients when followed up for 12 months.     

Evaluation of an Australian intervention to encourage breast feeding in primiparous women

Breast feeding has nutritional, immunologic and antiallergicadvantages for the infant. Although it has been widely recommendedthat infants be exclusively breast fed until 4–6 monthsof age, only about half of all Australian babies currently receiveextended breast feeding. The present study evaluated an intensiveprogramme designed to increase the proportion ofprimi-parousmothers who breast fed for 4 months or longer. Women who registeredwith the hospital at least 20 weeks before delivery and whointended to breastfeed were eligible for the study. Two hundredand thirty-five women were allocated to receive either usualcare or an intensive breast feeding programme when they registeredwith the hospital. The intensive programme consisted of writtenmaterials, and group and individual sessions with a lactationcounsellor. It also included a visit from a breastfeeding consultantwhile in hospital after the birth and contact on return home.Women were followed up 6 weeks and 4 months after delivery.There were no significant differences in breastfeeding ratesbetween the control and intervention groups at either follow-uppoint. Breast feeding until 4 months was more likely among womenwhose baby did not receive a bottle feed while still in hospitaland who did not smoke, use the combined oral contraceptive pillor introduce solid food before 4 months. Those mothers who enjoyedand felt satisfied with breastfeeding were more likely to continueto 4 months. It seems likely that programmes designed to increasebreastfeeding will need to address underlying factors such ashospital policy rather than simply providing more health education.     

Should equity in health be target number 1?

Policy measures to reduce socioeconomic health differences (SEHD)must be preceded by an analysis of the possibilities and desirabilityof a reduction. This paper argues that it is necessary to pursueequality in health, conceived as equal opportunities to achievehealth. This principle is justified as part of the principleof maximizing individual freedom of choice, and requires thateveryone has the opportunity to be as healthy as possible. Bymeans of this principle a distinction can be made between unjust,unavoidable, and acceptable health inequalities. The determinantsof SEHD which lead to inequalities considered unjust must besubject to policy. These are living conditions (physical andsocial environment and health care) and conditions of choice(e.g. the knowledge of an individual about the health risksof a certain behaviour). Even if SEHD are considered inequities,sometimes conflicting interests will make it difficult to proposea health policy to redress these inequities. These are partlythe consequence of the intersectoral character of a policy aimedat equality of opportunities to attain health, in which theimportance of health has to be weighed against other goals.Moreover the impact of such a policy on the individual freechoice has to be critically weighed. Finally in the contextof health care policy, conflicts between the principle of equalityand maximizing health can be expected.