Hormone replacement therapy with dydrogesterone and 17β-oestradiol: effects on serum lipoproteins and glucose tolerance during 24 month follow up

Objective To assess serum lipid and lipoprotein concentrations and oral glucose tolerance in postmenopausal women treated with 17β-oestradiol (2 mg/day) and cyclical dydrogesterone (10 mg/day for 14 days per 28 day cycle).
Design A 24 month prospective study of 29 women acting as their own controls. On-treatment samples were taken during the combined (oestrogen–progestogen) phase of therapy.
Setting Metabolic research unit in London.
Population Postmenopausal women with no previous exposure to hormone replacement therapy attending a menopause clinic in a London hospital.
Methods Fasting serum sampling and oral glucose tolerance testing.
Main outcome measures Serum lipids and lipoprotein concentrations and plasma glucose, insulin and C-peptide responses to an oral glucose load.
Results Restricting the analysis to the 17 women who completed the study, no effect was seen on serum triglyceride concentrations. There was a mean fall of 5.9% (95% CI 1.2 to −13.0) in concentrations of serum total cholesterol, reflecting the balance of a 10.7% fall (95% CI 4.3 to −25.8) in low density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations and a 16.3% increase (95% CI 7.3 to −25.3) in those of high density lipoproteins. Fasting glucose concentrations and glucose tolerance test responses were unchanged. Fasting insulin concentrations fell substantially (–41.6%, 95% CI −23.4 to −59.8) with falls also being seen in insulin responses to glucose. Fasting C-peptide concentrations increased by 36.2% (95% CI 9.17 to 63.3), with no consistent effect on C-peptide responses to glucose.
Conclusions Dydrogesterone did not appear to oppose the potentially beneficial effects of oestradiol on insulin or either low or high density lipoproteins, making the combination with 17β-oestradiol a potentially useful option for postmenopausal women particularly those at risk of cardiovascular disease or diabetes mellitus.     

Effect of body mass index and fat distribution on insulin sensitivity, secretion, and clearance in nonobese healthy men.

The effects of variation in body mass index (BMI; kg/m2) and body fat topography on insulin sensitivity, secretion, and clearance were determined in a group of 146 nonobese nondiabetic males. Volunteers underwent an i.v. glucose tolerance test, with determination of plasma glucose, insulin, and C-peptide levels. BMI was taken as a measure of overall adiposity, while skinfold thickness ratios were used to assess the centrality of fat distribution and the localization of central fat within the trunk. Measurements of insulin sensitivity, secretion, and clearance were obtained by mathematical modelling of the i.v. glucose tolerance test concentration profiles. Increasing BMI and centrality of fat distribution had no significant effect on glucose tolerance, but were independently associated with diminished insulin sensitivity and increased insulin secretion. The elevation in secretion occurred almost entirely during the second phase of pancreatic insulin release. These results show that the variations in insulin sensitivity and secretion that have often been reported in obesity are also present in a group within the normal range of BMI. However, the absence of any decrease in hepatic uptake, also reported in the obese, indicates that this might be an additional mechanism recruited to maintain glycemic control at higher levels of adiposity. Localization of central fat in the lower trunk was correlated with elevated first phase insulin secretion, but no concomitant change in insulin sensitivity. There may, therefore, be a direct effect of the distribution of central fat on insulin secretion.     

Oestrogens and insulin secretion

There is a persistent perception that oestrogens have an adverse effect on carbohydrate metabolism. It might therefore be expected that their use would result in a corresponding increase in the incidence of diabetes. Recent evidence from clinical trials suggesting that women on postmenopausal oestrogen hormone replacement therapy (HRT) have a reduced incidence of type 2 diabetes therefore appears paradoxical. Short-term supraphysiological oestrogen administration has an adverse effect on glucose tolerance, resulting from suppression of first-phase insulin secretion and increased insulin resistance. Oestrogen-induced increases in glucocorticoid activity could account for these effects. Oestrogen-induced deterioration in glucose tolerance is, however, accompanied by a reduction in fasting glucose, an effect that could be accounted for by glucagon antagonism. These short-term effects contrast with long-term preservation of insulin secretion and glucose homeostasis by oestrogens. In animal studies, ovariectomy is associated with decreased insulin secretion and increased risk of diabetes, whereas oestrogen administration protects against diabetes and increases the insulin response to glucose. The mechanism is uncertain, but direct effects on the pancreas via steroid receptors or indirect effects via oestrogen-induced glucagon antagonism and subclinical increases in glucocorticoids and growth hormone could all contribute. Recent evidence that HRT increases the risk of cardiovascular disease suggests that it should not be used for the prevention of diabetes, but the mechanism responsible for this benefit merits further investigation and might lead to new therapies.Electronic Supplementary Material Supplementary material is available in the online version of this article at     

An apparently anomalous relationship between insulin and C-peptide concentrations in their initial response to intravenous glucose.

Intravenous glucose tolerance tests (IVGTTs) with determination of plasma glucose, insulin, and C-peptide concentrations were performed in 136 men and 154 women. It was found that in 4% of men and 12% of women the plasma concentration of insulin exceeded that of C-peptide during the initial response to glucose. Subjects exhibiting this phenomenon had lower fasting and post-glucose C-peptide concentrations than those who did not; however, there were no statistically significant differences in glucose or insulin concentrations. The phenomenon was age-related, being absent from individuals aged 35 years and under, while in older age groups it appeared to be more prevalent in women than in men, suggesting an additional effect of menopause. However, in three follow-up IVGTTs performed in a subgroup of postmenopausal women over a period of 18 months, the phenomenon failed to recur in any of the individuals who first exhibited it, although it did occur in others. Our observations suggest the existence of an age-related but intermittent decrease in pancreatic insulin secretion, which does not lead to any significant change in plasma insulin concentrations, possibly as a result of reduced hepatic uptake of insulin. One consequence appears to be an excess of insulin over C-peptide during the early part of the IVGTT, which is probably related to the different distributional kinetics of the two peptides.     

Adiposity Measurements by BMI,Skinfolds and Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry in relation to Risk Markers for Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes in Adult Males

Background. Choice of adiposity measure may be important in the evaluation of relationships between adiposity and risk markers for cardiovascular disease and diabetes. Aim. We explored the strengths of risk marker associations with BMI, a simple measure of adiposity, and with measures provided by skinfold thicknesses and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Subjects and Methods. We evaluated in three subgroups of white males (n = 156–349), participating in a health screening program, the strengths of relationship between measures of total and regional adiposity and risk markers relating to blood pressure, lipids and lipoproteins, insulin sensitivity, and subclinical inflammation. Results. Independent of age, smoking, alcohol intake, and exercise, the strongest correlations with adiposity measures were seen with serum triglyceride concentrations and indices of insulin sensitivity, with strengths of association showing little difference between BMI and skinfold and DXA measures of total and percent body fat (R = 0.20–0.46, P < 0.01). Significant but weaker associations with adiposity were seen for serum HDL cholesterol and only relatively inconsistent associations with adiposity for total and LDL cholesterol and indices of subclinical inflammation. Conclusions. BMI can account for variation in risk markers in white males as well as more sophisticated measures derived from skinfold thickness measurements or DXA scanning.     

Loss of the normal coupling between the anaerobic threshold and insulin sensitivity in chronic heart failure

OBJECTIVE—To explore whether the anaerobic threshold, a measure of the balance between aerobic and anaerobic cellular metabolism, is related to whole body insulin sensitivity in healthy individuals and in patients with chronic heart failure, which involves is an imbalance of aerobic and anaerobic metabolism.DESIGN—Case-control study.SETTING—A teaching hospital department specialising in heart failure.PATIENTS—20 healthy individuals (mean (SEM) age 55.2 (2.7) years) and 36 patients with chronic heart failure (59.1 (2.0) years, New York Heart Association class I-IV, anaerobic threshold 11.8 (0.7) ml/kg/min, left ventricular ejection fraction 26 (2)%).INTERVENTIONS—An intravenous glucose tolerance test for assessment of insulin sensitivity (minimal model analysis) and a maximum treadmill exercise test for assessment of the anaerobic threshold, derived from measurement of oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide output.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES—Relation between insulin sensitivity and the anaerobic threshold in patients with chronic heart failure.RESULTS—While anaerobic threshold was positively correlated with insulin sensitivity in healthy controls (r = 0.72, p < 0.001), no such relation was observed in patients with chronic heart failure. In stepwise multiple linear regression analyses of variables in healthy individuals, insulin sensitivity emerged as the only predictor of anaerobic threshold (standardised coefficient = 0.72, p < 0.001), while fasting insulin, incremental insulin area, and total body fat (dual photon x ray absorptiometry) failed to enter into final models (joint R = 0.52, p < 0.001).CONCLUSIONS—In healthy individuals, whole body insulin sensitivity is related, or "coupled," to the anaerobic threshold. The absence of such metabolic coupling in patients with chronic heart failure provides further evidence of disturbed cellular metabolism in patients with this condition.     

The autonomic control of heart rate and insulin resistance in young adults

The pathophysiology of insulin resistance is unclear. A link between increased heart rate (HR) and insulin resistance suggests an association with sympathetic nervous system activity. To further evaluate this, we examined autonomic activity using spectral analysis of HR variability (HRV), which provides a measure of cardiac sympathovagal modulation, and related this to insulin sensitivity (Si) in 137 men and women (20 yr old). The HRV spectrum displays 2 major peaks: a high-frequency peak, reflecting vagal activity, and a low-frequency peak caused by vagal and sympathetic activity. The high-to-low ratio (HLratio) reflects sympathovagal balance. Si was measured, using the i.v. glucose tolerance test with minimal modeling, and HR data was derived from a 15-min supine electrocardiogram. Women were more insulin resistant than men (Si, 3.94 vs. 5.09 10(4) min(-1)/per pmol x L; P = 0.002), had higher HR (59 vs. 56 beats/min, P = 0.019), but had a higher HLratio (2.04 vs. 1.31, P = 0.001). In men (but not women), Si correlated with HR (r = -0.410, P = 0.001) and measures of HRV: HLratio (r = 0.291, P = 0.002) independently of body mass index. In conclusion, Si correlates with cardiac sympathovagal balance in men, but not women, suggesting gender differences in the autonomic modulation of insulin resistance.     

Impaired insulin sensitivity as an independent risk factor for mortality in patients with stable chronic heart failure.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the significance of insulin resistance as an independent risk factor for impaired prognosis in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). BACKGROUND: In CHF, impaired insulin sensitivity (S(I)) indicates abnormal energy metabolism and is related to decreased exercise capacity and muscle fatigue. The relationship between insulin resistance (i.e., low S(I)) and survival in patients with CHF has not been established. METHODS: We prospectively studied 105 male patients with CHF due to ischemic (63%) or non-ischemic (37%) etiology. All patients were in clinically stable condition (age 62 +/- 1 year, New York Heart Association [NYHA] functional class 2.6 +/- 0.1, left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] 28 +/- 2%, peak oxygen uptake [Vo(2)] 18.2 +/- 0.7 ml/kg/min). Insulin sensitivity was assessed from glucose and insulin dynamic profiles during an intravenous glucose tolerance test using the minimal model technique. RESULTS: During a mean follow-up period of 44 +/- 4 months, 53 patients (50%) died. Patients with S(I) below the median value (median: 1.82 min(-1) x microU x ml(-1).10(4); n = 52) had worse survival (at two years 61% [range 47% to 74%]) than patients with S(I) above the median value (n = 53; at two years 83% [range 73% to 93%]; risk ratio [RR] 0.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.21 to 0.67; p = 0.001). Both patient groups were similar in terms of age, NYHA functional class, and body composition parameters (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometric scan; p > 0.2), but patients with a lower S(I) had a lower LVEF (24 +/- 2% vs. 33 +/- 3%) and peak Vo(2) (16.8 +/- 1.0 ml/kg/min vs. 19.7 +/- 1.0 ml/kg/min; both p < 0.05). On univariate Cox analysis, higher S(I) predicted better survival (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.89; p = 0.015). On stepwise multivariate analysis, S(I) predicted mortality independently of other variables. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with CHF, lower S(I) relates to higher mortality, independent of body composition and established prognosticators. Impaired S(I) may have implications in the pathophysiology of CHF disease progression. Therapeutically targeting impaired insulin sensitivity may potentially be beneficial in patients with CHF.