The effects of cardiopulmonary bypass and cold cardioplegia on coronary flow velocity and the reactive hyperemic response in patients and dogs

In normal coronary arteries, reactive hyperemic responses to a 20-second occlusion, an index of coronary reserve, usually demonstrate a peak-to-resting flow velocity ratio of 4:1 or more. Most intraoperative studies that have assessed reactive hyperemic responses in bypassed vessels have reported peak-to-resting flow velocity ratios of 2:1 or less following a 20-second occlusion. These decreased reactive hyperemic responses could be due to coronary vasodilatation after cardiopulmonary bypass or to an inadequate physiological result of the surgical procedure. In 14 patients with angiographically normal coronary arteries, the peak-to-resting flow velocity ratio following a 20-second coronary occlusion decreased significantly (p less than 0.05) from 4.4 +/- 0.2 (mean +/- standard error) before bypass to 3.0 +/- 0.3 after bypass. In a similar dog model, the peak-to-resting flow velocity ratio decreased by 36 to 52% during the first hour following one hour of cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegia. During the same period, left ventricular perfusion increased 21 to 30%, mean arterial pressure and coronary vascular resistance decreased, and myocardial oxygen consumption was unchanged. In a second group of dogs studied for the effects of duration (200 to 240 minutes) of anesthesia and thoracotomy alone, peak-to-resting flow velocity ratio was significantly lower. These clinical and experimental studies suggest that major coronary vasodilatation occurs early following cardiopulmonary bypass and cold cardioplegia, and may contribute to the blunted coronary reactive hyperemic responses reported during this time. Consequently, an intraoperative peak-to-resting flow velocity ratio of 3:1 for bypassed coronary arteries may represent an excellent physiological result.     

A randomized controlled trial of electromagnetic therapy in the primary care management of venous leg ulceration

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to establish the potential efficacy, tolerabilityand side-effect profile of electromagnetic therapy as an adjunctto conventional dressings in the treatment of venous leg ulcers. METHOD: A prospective, randomized, double blind controlled clinicaltrial was carried out in a dedicated leg ulcer clinic basedin one urban general practice. Nineteen patients with leg ulcersof confirmed venous aetiology were assessed. The main outcomemeasures were rate and scale of venous leg ulcer healing, changesin patient-reported pain levels, quality of life, degree ofmobility, side effect profile and acceptability to patientsand staff. RESULTS: Sixty-eight per cent of patients attending this dedicated clinicachieved improvements in the size of their ulcer (4, 21%, healedfully) and in reduced pain levels (P < 0.05) during the trial,despite the chronicity of ulcer histories. Patients treatedwith electromagnetic therapy at 800 Hz were found at day 50to have significantly greater healing (P < 0.05) and paincontrol (P < 0.05) than placebo therapy or treatment with600 Hz. All patients reported improved mobility at the end ofthe study. The electromagnetic therapy was well tolerated bypatients, with no differences between groups in reporting adverseevents, and proved acceptable to staff. CONCLUSION: Despite the small numbers in this pilot study, electromagnetictherapy provided significant gains in the healing of venousleg ulcers and reduction in pain. Keywords. Electromagnetic therapy, RCT, leg ulcers, primary care.