Association Between Patient and Physician Sex and Physician-Estimated Stroke and Bleeding Risks in Atrial Fibrillation

Background

Physicians treating nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) assess stroke and bleeding risks when deciding on anticoagulation. The agreement between empirical and physician-estimated risks is unclear. Furthermore, the association between patient and physician sex and anticoagulation decision-making is uncertain.

Internal eye wall resection in the management of uveal melanoma

Twenty patients with presumed uveal melanoma underwent internal eye wall resection. It was the primary procedure in 13 patients who had tumours within 2 disc diameters of the optic nerve head and was combined with external resection in the remainder. Malignant melanoma was confirmed histologically in 15 patients; the diagnosis was a benign tumour in the other 5. The length of follow-up ranged from 2 to 37 (mean 19) months. In all cases the retina was completely attached at the time of last examination. The visual acuity ranged from 20/40 to hand movements; nine patients had an acuity of 20/400 or better. At the time of writing no metastatic disease or local recurrence had developed in any of the 15 patients in whom malignant melanoma was diagnosed.     

Phase I study of high-dose cytosine arabinoside and etoposide in patients with advanced malignancies

Summary Cytosine arabinsodie (ara-C) and etoposide (VP-16) display synergy in the laboratory. Twenty-six patients participated in a phase I study of high-dose ara-C in combination with VP-16. The dose of VP-16 was held constant at 50 mg/m² as an intermittent infusion over 33 h; escalating doses of ara-C were given as infusions during hours 9–12 and 21–24. Myelosuppression was the dose-limiting toxicity and occurred with doses considerably less than those expected from studies of the two drugs as single agents. The suggested initial doses for phase II trials with this schedule are 750 mg/m²×2 doses of ara-C and 50 mg/m² of VP-16. Nonhematologic toxicity was minimal; therefore, further dose escalation is feasible in patients in whom myelosuppression is acceptable.Supported in part by grants from the National Cancer Institute (CA-12197 and CA-09422) and the American Cancer Society CF-85-182