Application of the adverse outcome pathway framework to genotoxic modes of action

In May 2017, the Health and Environmental Sciences Institute's Genetic Toxicology Technical Committee hosted a workshop to discuss whether mode of action (MOA) investigation is enhanced through the application of the adverse outcome pathway (AOP) framework. As AOPs are a relatively new approach in genetic toxicology, this report describes how AOPs could be harnessed to advance MOA analysis of genotoxicity pathways using five example case studies. Each of these genetic toxicology AOPs proposed for further development includes the relevant molecular initiating events, key events, and adverse outcomes (AOs), identification and/or further development of the appropriate assays to link an agent to these events, and discussion regarding the biological plausibility of the proposed AOP. A key difference between these proposed genetic toxicology AOPs versus traditional AOPs is that the AO is a genetic toxicology endpoint of potential significance in risk characterization, in contrast to an adverse state of an organism or a population. The first two detailed case studies describe provisional AOPs for aurora kinase inhibition and tubulin binding, leading to the common AO of aneuploidy. The remaining three case studies highlight provisional AOPs that lead to chromosome breakage or mutation via indirect DNA interaction (inhibition of topoisomerase II, production of cellular reactive oxygen species, and inhibition of DNA synthesis). These case studies serve as starting points for genotoxicity AOPs that could ultimately be published and utilized by the broader toxicology community and illustrate the practical considerations and evidence required to formalize such AOPs so that they may be applied to genetic toxicity evaluation schemes. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 61:114–134, 2020. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Monotherapy with enoxaparin for the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism.

This study aimed to determine whether a weight-adjusted dose of subcutaneous enoxaparin is as effective and safe as oral acenocoumarol for the secondary prophylaxis of pulmonary embolism. Three hundred and eighty consecutive noncancer outpatients hospitalized with an episode of symptomatic pulmonary embolism selected treatment with acenocoumarol or enoxaparin at a dose of 1 mg/kg once daily after being informed of the type of administration and expected frequency of laboratory monitoring for both medicinal products. Endpoints were symptomatic recurrent thromboembolic events evaluated by standard objective testing, and a composite endpoint of recurrent venous thromboembolism, major bleeding, and death from any cause. One hundred and ninety-nine patients (52%) chose acenocoumarol therapy and 181 chose enoxaparin monotherapy. Four patients in the enoxaparin group (2.2%) and six patients in the acenocoumarol group (3%) had an objective thromboembolic recurrence (hazard ratio, 1.35; 95% confidence interval, 0.38-4.79; P = 0.64). Nine patients in the enoxaparin group (5.0%) had a hemorrhagic complication compared with 11 in the acenocoumarol group (5.5%) (P = 0.81). The hospital length of stay was shorter with enoxaparin compared with acenocoumarol (11 versus 16 days, P = 0.0001). Enoxaparin is as effective and safe as acenocoumarol in the secondary prevention of recurrent thromboembolic disease and is associated with shorter hospitalization.     

Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) is an option for patients with localized breast recurrences after previous external-beam radiotherapy

Background  

For patients suffering of recurrent breast cancer within the irradiated breast, generally mastectomy is recommended. The normal tissue tolerance does not permit a second full-dose course of radiotherapy to the entire breast after a second breast-conserving surgery (BCS). A novel option is to treat these patients with partial breast irradiation (PBI). This approach is based on the hypothesis that re-irradiation of a limited volume will be effective and result in an acceptable frequency of side effects. The following report presents a single center experience with intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) during excision of recurrent breast cancer in the previously irradiated breast.     

Perioperative complications following sagittal split osteotomy of the mandible.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to review complications in a series of 1264 consecutive patients who were operated in a single centre during a 20-year-period. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Complications were documented, their incidences calculated and compared with data from the literature. RESULTS: In 35 patients (2.8%) infection developed requiring extraoral incision and drainage; in 27 patients (2.1%) the inferior alveolar nerve was inadvertently cut; 18 patients (1.4%) had to undergo re-operation due to bending or fracture of osteosynthesis material; 15 patients (1.2%) suffered from bleeding complications; in 12 patients (0.9%) an unfavourable split occurred. In 8 patients (0.6%) foreign bodies were left in situ; in 7 patients a partial weakness of the facial nerve occurred, which was permanent in 1 patient. Six patients (0.5%) with a significantly higher age than average (mean: 33.6 years in comparison with 23.1 years) developed non-union at the site of osteotomy, and the mandible had to be bone grafted. Two patients (0.2%) developed osteomyelitis, and in one patient airway problems led to a need for tracheostomy (0.1%). CONCLUSION: Although some of these complications of bilateral sagittal split with osteotomy carry severe limitations in health related quality of life, it remains an overall safe procedure, demanding, however, comprehensive informed consent. Good knowledge of technical reasons for these complications should help to reduce their incidence.     

A comparison of two pancreatin microsphere preparations in cystic fibrosis.

OBJECTIVES: to compare the efficacy and tolerance of Creon and Pancrease in children and young adults with cystic fibrosis. METHODS: a double blind, crossover study of two pH sensitive microsphere preparations of pancreatin (Creon, Pancrease), given in equivalent lipase dosage to 27 children with cystic fibrosis, was conducted. RESULTS: at similar lipase activity no significant difference was found in the following: coefficient of fat absorption (CFA), coefficient of nitrogen absorption (CNA), weight gain, mean adequate daily intake for energy, and subjective symptoms. Three children who had a CFA less than 70% while receiving Pancrease all improved on Creon. No children had a CFA less than 70% while receiving Creon. A significant reduction in the number of capsules required daily to achieve similar control was possible when changing from Pancrease (mean 25/day) to Creon (mean 15/day). Seventy percent of patients preferred Creon and this was likely to be related to a perceived reduction in abdominal pain and stool frequency, and need for less capsules per day. CONCLUSION: Creon and Pancrease are equally effective at doses providing equal lipase activity, however, the reduced number of capsules, fewer symptoms, and possible improvement of more severe steatorrhoea result in an increased patient preference for Creon.