A new index for evaluating horizontal skeletal discrepancies and predicting treatment outcomes

The cephalometric measurement known as Wits appraisal (AOBO) was studied to determine its importance in diagnosis, treatment, and prediction of treatment success. The Wits appraisal is used primarily to identify unreliable ANB values (those that do not accurately reflect the degree of horizontal jaw discrepancy, ie, those that differ greatly from the AOBO value). Therefore, differences between AOBO and ANB also were evaluated. Because neither measurement alone can assess jaw discrepancies with total accuracy, they were combined, plotted on a scattergram, and divided into equal zones to create a new index of horizontal skeletal discrepancies and treatment predictability. Pretreatment values correspond to treatment difficulty, and posttreatment values correspond to the effectiveness of treatment. Treatment time for each zone also was evaluated. We were able to draw several conclusions from this study. First, combining AOBO and ANB values results in a more accurate measurement of treatment difficulty. These combined values also can be used to predict both treatment time and the success of treatment for horizontal discrepancies. Second, the AOBO value predicts variations in treatment time at each ANB value. Finally, adding ANB and AOBO values and then dividing the total yields zones that represent statistically significant differences in treatment times and percentages of success. The zones also correlate with the difference between AOBO and ANB measurements.     

Controlled trial of clinical utility of serum salicylate monitoring in rheumatoid arthritis

A crossover double-blind controlled trial was performed on 36 patients with rheumatoid arthritis to assess the necessity for serum salicylate monitoring in determining optimal dosage. There was no clinically or statistically significant increase in the clinical improvement of patients associated with serum monitoring but potentially toxic serum levels occurred without tinnitus when serum monitoring was not used.     

The care of burned upper extremities

Two sets of factors will ultimately influence the outcome of the burned upper extremity. The first set of factors is the depth and severity of the burn. The second set is the group of complications of the burn injury attributable to edema, inflammation, immobility, and malposition. An awareness of the potential pitfalls that follow burn injury has resulted in improved primary care and a lessening of deformity. Progressive acute care with topical chemotherapy, early motion, thoughtful splinting, and timely burn wound closure are essential to reduce the need for secondary operations. Reconstructive efforts should be tailored to the individual needs of the patient. These procedures should be carefully planned with a view toward balancing aesthetic and functional considerations and minimizing the time required for rehabilitation.     

Occurrence of the t(2;5)(p23;q35) in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

Primary CD30(Ki-1)-positive anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL) is considered by some to be a distinct clinicopathologic entity associated with the t(2;5) (p23;q35). However, the specificity of t(2;5) for ALCL has not been carefully studied. Therefore, we performed a detailed analysis of all cases of ALCL with abnormal cytogenetics results in the Nebraska Lymphoma Study Group registry, as well as all other cases of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with t(2;5) in the registry. We found the t(2;5) in only five of 10 cases of ALCL, four of whom were young patients. However, we also found the t(2;5) in 11 other cases of nonanaplastic lymphoma, including eight children with typical peripheral T-cell lymphomas of various types. The t(2;5) was also found in three older adults with B-cell lymphomas of various types. Thus, the t(2;5) was not specific for CD30+ ALCL. However, t(2;5) may define a clinicopathologic entity in children and young adults characterized by variable morphologies with a T-cell or indeterminate phenotype, CD30-positivity, nodal disease with frequent extranodal involvement, advanced stage, and an excellent response to therapy, including bone marrow transplantation for relapsed disease. The clinical relevance of the t(2;5) in older patients requires further study.     

Dural sinus thrombosis: study using intermediate field strength MR imaging

The magnetic resonance (MR) images of six patients with thrombosis of a dural sinus were reviewed. The diagnosis had been verified by computed tomographic scans in three patients and arteriograms in two; in the sixth patient, only MR imaging was used to confirm the clinical syndrome. In all patients, high-intensity signal was seen from the thrombus within the affected dural sinus on all echoes. This persistent signal intensity allowed intravascular clot to be distinguished from normal causes of increased signal such as flow-related enhancement (entry phenomenon) and even-echo rephasing. MR imaging demonstrated the cause of the thrombosis in three patients: two were secondary to adjacent tumors, and one was secondary to unsuspected mastoiditis. Complications such as infarction were also demonstrated. Using MR imaging, one can easily and safely diagnose thrombosis of a dural sinus. MR should be the imaging method of choice in patients suspected of having thrombosis of a dural sinus.     

Urogenitale Infektionen beim Mann – können sie die Fertilität beeinflussen?

Urogenital infections are established as hazards to male fertility. Various pathophysiological hypotheses have evolved from experimental and clinical studies, facilitating explanation of the effects of bacteria and immunological events on reproductive tissues. Numerous current studies have identified and evaluated infectious mediators accounting for specific molecular events in urogenital infections. Valuable studies can be expected to appear in the future due to improvements in diagnostic procedures and new classifications of urogenital infections.     

Ankylosing spondylitis antirheumatic drug trials. III. Setting the delta for clinical trials of antirheumatic drugs--results of a consensus development (Delphi) exercise.

Defining the minimum clinically important difference or delta to be detected in a clinical trial depends on a number of factors including the research hypothesis, patient characteristics, the nature of the intervention and the trial design. In 2 previous studies, we have developed standardized procedures for conducting outcome measurement based on current Food and Drug Administration and European League Against Rheumatism guidelines for clinical trials in ankylosing spondylitis, and thereafter, determined the standard deviation for these outcome measures. In the final component of this series of studies, we have employed a Delphi technique to establish estimates for delta, and calculated the sample size requirements under 2 different conditions of Type I and Type II error probabilities.