An experiment in medical education. A critical analysis using traditional criteria

In 1984, in addition to its standard traditional curriculum, Rush Medical College (Chicago, Ill) developed a Socratic problem-based method of teaching basic science material called the alternative curriculum. As part of an evaluation of this new curriculum, students in the two curricula were compared using three traditional measurements: (1) test scores from the National Board of Medical Examiners, Part I; (2) test scores from the National Board of Medical Examiners, Part II; and (3) performance on an oral examination. Alternative curriculum students did not differ significantly from their traditional curriculum classmates on National Board of Medical Examiners, Part I and Part II total scores, although their subset scores on Part I did tend to be lower, reaching significance in one subset area. Differences in performance favoring the traditional curriculum were primarily seen in the early years of the program. Alternative curriculum students in the class matriculated in 1987 scored significantly higher in three of five categories on the oral examination.     

Prevention of bacterial infection and sepsis in acute severe pancreatitis.

Between 1984 and 1986 six patients with acute respiratory failure (requiring ventilation for at least 3 days) complicating acute pancreatitis were managed on the intensive care unit (median ventilation period 6 days; range 3-41 days). Between 1987 and 1989 nine similar patients were managed (median ventilation period 35 days, range 4-69 days), and a regimen of enteral tobramycin, polymyxin and amphotericin to selectively decontaminate the digestive tract (SDD) was introduced. Five of six patients treated before 1987 had serious infections (three Gram-negative, one fungal), compared with only one of nine patients treated with SDD (P < 0.05). Clinical signs of sepsis were evident for 62% of the pre-SDD period, compared with 39% of the period during SDD therapy (P < 0.001). Systemic antibiotic prescribing was reduced in the SDD group; however, mortality remained unaffected with only two patients surviving pre-SDD and three during SDD treatment. SDD reduces infection rates and sepsis in patients with acute pancreatitis and may help to improve the prognosis of this life-threatening condition.     

骨形态计量学评价低钙对大鼠皮质骨的作用研究

目的 评价低钙饮食对大鼠皮质骨的影响。方法 3月龄SD普通级雄性大鼠40只，随机分为5组。第1、2组饲养1个月，分为正常对照组(1mol，ca1．0％)和极低钙组VLCD(1mol，Ca0．1％)，余下3组饲养3个月，分为正常对照组(3mol，Ca1．0％)、极低钙组VLCD(3mol，Ca0．1％)和低钙组LCD(3mol，Ca0．3％)。各组动物喂养包含对应钙含量的精制饲料，处死前进行双荧光标记。实验结束时，取左侧胫骨中段行骨形态计量学检测。结果 无论是低钙饮食1个月，还是3个月，无论是极度缺钙，还是仅有轻微的钙不足，胫骨中段横截面皮质骨始终未出现显著意义的变化，但骨内膜骨吸收有增加的趋势。结论 低钙对皮质骨作用不明显，这可能与机体在低钙状态下动用骨骼的次序或快慢有关。     

Red cell antigens and renal transplantation

Donor-specific transfusion was performed with and without cyclosporine between haplomismatched relatives prior to living-donor renal transplantation. Red cell antigen mismatching was not taken as a contraindication to DST. Of 80 patients included in the trial; eleven were ABO-mismatched, 15 were Rh(D)-mismatched, and a further 11 were transfused in the presence of atypical red cell antibodies (anti-D, -C, -Fya, -Kell -N, -H/I -I, -P1, -Wra). Patients were randomized to receive cyclosporine (10 mg/kg) daily during DST or not (control group). The presence of atypical red cell antibodies, with the exception of Rh anti-D, did not appear to influence DST or renal transplantation. DST did not act as a primary stimulus to Rh anti-D production but stimulated preexisting anti D levels. ABO mismatching did not appear to influence DST or subsequent renal transplantation except in one group A [corrected] patient who received group O [corrected] blood and cyclosporine. This patient developed a severe, but self-limiting, autoimmune hemolytic anemia due to auto-anti A antibodies. A similar group A patient in the control group developed an auto-antibody with no clinical sequelae. The influence of cyclosporine on the development of this auto-antibody is uncertain. We conclude that, with the exception of preexisting anti-D antibodies, minor red cell antigen disparities should not preclude pretransplant conditioning with donor-specific transfusions.