External comparisons with the case-cohort design

The case-cohort design can be an economic alternative to the standard cohort design. Prentice (Biometrika 1986;73:1-11) showed how the case-cohort design can be used to obtain relative risk estimates for comparisons within the cohort being studied. In this paper, the authors consider ways in which the case-cohort design can be used for comparing risk in exposure groups within the cohort to the risk in an external population. The problem reduces to estimating the number of expected cases at each exposure level in the total cohort, when exposure status is available only for members of a subcohort, i.e., a random sample of the total cohort. The authors describe theoretical and empirical properties of several variations of the design and analysis of case-cohort studies. Empirical properties were examined by replicating the selection of the subcohort in a study of second cancer risk after chemotherapy for a first cancer. Use of a case-cohort design in that study would have saved five-sixths of the cost of gathering covariate information at the price of only an 11% loss in efficiency relative to a full cohort study.     

Severe hemorrhagic radiation proctitis advancing to gradual cessation with hyperbaric oxygen

Summary We report a case of a male patient suffering from a severe hemorrhagic radiation proctitis which gradually ceased with hyperbaric oxygen. We discuss the mechanisms of chronic radiation injury and the effect of the hyperbaric oxygen. This therapy is proposed as an alternative to surgical intervention for this abnormality.     

Determination of the risk of a 2d cancer in patients treated for a first cancer

A paradoxical effect of radiotherapy and chemotherapy for cancer is that some of these treatments can themselves cause new cancers. Most epidemiologic methods can be applied successfully to the investigation of this problem and this paper reviews various approaches that have already been used by various researchers. The authors first review the more traditional methods, i.e., cohort and case-control studies and they then describe designs that have been proposed more recently, such as case-cohort studies. A distinction is established between internal comparisons, carried out within the study population, and external comparisons, in which a general population external to the population under study is used as the reference category. This presentation is mainly aimed at investigators using tumor registry data. However, the general principles formulated here are easily generalized to contexts other than that of registries.     

Comparison of bone mass measured by histomorphometry on iliac biopsy and by dual photon absorptiometry of the lumbar spine

In a prospective study we compared bone mass measured independently by dual photon absorptiometry (DPA) on lumbar spine and by histomorphometry on transiliac biopsy. Measurements were done in 83 patients (23 males, 60 females) with various generalized bone diseases, including spinal osteoporosis, primary hyperparathyroidism and osteopetrosis. Iliac bone density was analyzed on bone biopsy with an automatic image analyzer and expressed as the trabecular bone volume (TBV), the cortical thickness (CT) and the total bone density (TBD) which includes the density of both spongy and cortical bone within the periosteal envelope. The bone mineral content (BMC) and density (BMD) were measured from L2 to L4 with a Novo Lab 22a device. For the 83 patients, there were significant correlations between values given by both methods, with r values ranging from 0.74 to 0.43, according to the bone mass parameters analyzed. In the 37 patients with untreated vertebral osteoporosis, the TBV--but not the CT nor the TBD--correlated significantly with the BMD of the spine (r = 0.53, p less than 0.001). In conclusion, there is a significant correlation between bone density of the iliac crest assessed histomorphometrically and spinal density measured by DPA. Despite the fact that DPA measures both trabecular and cortical bone of the spine, it correlates better with iliac trabecular bone mass than with the overall iliac bone density.     

Developing the occupational stress indicator (OSI) for use in Brazil: A report on the reliability and validity of the translated OSI

The Occupational Stress Indicator (OSI) was translated into Brazilian Portuguese and administered to a sample of 84 white-collar workers in Brazil. Five of the six scales of the OSI (job satisfaction, mental and physical health, coping, type A behaviour, sources of stress) showed acceptable reliability. The reliability of the sixth scale (locus of control) was disappointing, in keeping with earlier findings that suggest that this scale requires further development. Alternative measures of the stress outcomes — job satisfaction, mental health and physical health — were taken in order to assess the construct validity of these three scales. These measures included translations of the Hackman-Oldham job satisfaction measure and the Crown–Crisp Experiential Index, as well as subjective measures of health-related behaviours. Correlational and multivariate analyses of these data suggested that the job satisfaction, mental health and physical health scales of the OSI had good validity, with the physical health measure probably including a psychosomatic component. These findings are promising for the development of a new version of the OSI designed for use in South America.     

Evaluation of a communication and stress management training programme for infertile couples

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates a patient education programme focussed on improving communication and stress management skills among couples in fertility treatment. METHODS: In total, 37 couples completed the intervention. Two teachers conducted all the five courses offered. The effectiveness regarding communication and infertility-related stress was assessed by questionnaires immediately before (time T1) and after the intervention (time T2). Seeking of information and professional support was assessed at a 12-month follow-up (time T3); response rates were: T1, 93.2%; T2, 85.1%; T3, 74.3%. Data were compared at baseline (T1) and at the 12-month follow-up (T3) with a prospective cohort of Danish people in fertility treatment. RESULTS: There were no differences in infertility-related stress at base line between the two groups studied. We estimated the bi-directional changes in communication, e.g., changes from talking often to talking less frequently and vice versa. More intervention participants started to talk often with their partner about infertility and its treatment after the intervention compared to those who stopped to talk often. Women and men changed occurrence, frequency and content of communication with close other people. Among women marital benefit increased significantly. Infertility-related stress was not reduced significantly. Significantly more intervention participants than in the comparison group had contacted support groups, a psychologist and/or agencies for adoption at the 12-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: The intervention resulted in important perceived improvement in the participants' competence to actively manage changes in marital communication and in communication in different social arenas. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: We recommend fertility clinics to develop and evaluate different interventions for those fertility couples who ask for more psychosocial support.