Isolated cavernous bodies

Corpus cavernosography in a patient with erectile dysfunction revealed absence of communication between the 2 cavernous bodies. No similar case was found in a review of 100 consecutive cavernosograms or in the literature. The abnormality may be a source of error in pressure recordings or in intravenous injection of pharmaceutical agents.     

Cellular kinetics of prednimustine versus chlorambucil plus prednisolone in vitro

Summary Intracellular concentrations of prednimustine (PM), chlorambucil (CLB), phenylacetic acid mustard (PAAM) and prednisolone (P) were measured in different experimental tumor cell lines that had been incubated with either PM or CLB+P. For intracellular analytical determination, we modified a high-pressure liquid chromatographic method for the detection of these substances in plasma. Intact PM could be detected in the intracellular compartment of the incubated tumor cells. PM-incubated cells from PM-injected rats exhibited a higher intracellular concentration-time integral (PAAM) and longer concentration-time profiles for drugs with alkylating capacity than did cells exposed to the CLB+P mixture or to CLB. PAAM was not detectable after incubation of cells with PM, whereas in CLB-incubated cells the AUC of PAAM exceeded that of the parent drug CLB. Our in vitro results therefore favour the concept of a facilitated intracellular uptake and an increased antiproliferative effect for PM versus CLB and CLB+P.Dedicated to Prof. Dr. H. J. Dengler on the occasion of his 65th birthday. This study was supported by the Ministry of Science and Research of Nordrhein-Westfalen     

Evaluation of the metformin initiation rate in veterans with newly identified type 2 diabetes

BackgroundAn estimated 35 million individuals in the United States have diabetes. The American Diabetes Association recommends metformin as first-line pharmacologic treatment. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the metformin initiation rate in veterans with recently identified type 2 diabetes.MethodsVeterans with new onset type 2 diabetes were identified using National Veterans Health Administration Data. Retrospective information was obtained from those with a first A1C ≥ 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) between 2013 and 2018. Veterans with at least one additional A1C < 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) documented in the three years prior to the A1C diagnostic for diabetes were included in the analysis.ResultsA total of 144,180 veterans were included. Of those, 45,776 (31.7%) were started on metformin within one year of diabetes diagnosis. The median time to metformin initiation was 12 days and median time to initiation of any anti-hyperglycemic was 11 days. Approximately 16,000 veterans were referred for lifestyle interventions within 90 days.ConclusionMetformin initiation occurred in fewer patients than expected given metformin is a generic, well-tolerated medication recommended as first-line pharmacologic treatment option regardless of A1C. Further studies are needed to assess the barriers of initiating metformin at time of diabetes diagnosis.     

Retinal hemorrhages in the preterm neonate. A prospective randomized study comparing the occurrence of hemorrhages after spontaneous versus forceps delivery

The incidence and magnitude of retinal hemorrhages (RH) in a group of 23 preterm infants (29-35 weeks) born spontaneously in vertex presentation have been compared with those of 23 others (28-35 weeks) born by gentle extraction with small forceps. Distribution to the groups was random. The overall frequency of RH in both groups together was low, 6%, with no statistically significant difference between the groups. No fundi with severe (grade III) hemorrhages were seen. Both the incidence and magnitude of RH were less in the preterm neonates when compared with previously reported figures in term infants born spontaneously or with forceps extraction. The study provides further evidence in support of the hypothesis that fetal head compression with venous congestion is the main cause of RH in the newborn.     

Follow-up and final results of the Oslo I Study comparing screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading

Purpose: To compare cancer detection rates of screen-film (SFM) and full-field digital mammography (FFDM) with soft-copy reading in a screening program including the initial positive scores for interval cancers and cancers in the subsequent screening round, and to analyze the false-negative FFDM interpretations.

Material and Methods: Using a paired study design, 3683 women underwent SFM and FFDM in a population-based screening program. Two standard views of each breast were acquired. The images were interpreted without previous films for comparison. Independent double reading using a 5-point rating scale for probability of cancer was used for each modality. An examination was defined as positive if at least one of the two independent readers scored 2 or higher on the 5-point rating scale. SFM-positive cases were discussed in a SFM consensus meeting and FFDM-positive cases in a separate FFDM consensus meeting before recall. The study population was followed for more than 2 years so that interval cancers and screen-detected cancers in the subsequent screening round could be included. Cancer detection rates were compared using the McNemar test for paired proportions. The kappa statistic and Wilcoxon signed-rank test for matched pairs were used for comparing rating scores. The reading time was recorded for all FFDM interpretations.

Results: A total of 31 cancers (detection rate 0.84%) were diagnosed initially, of which SFM detected 28 and FFDM 23 (McNemar test P = 0.23, discordant pair 8 and 3). Two cancers with a positive score at initial SFM reading and three with a positive score at initial FFDM reading were dismissed at SFM and FFDM consensus meetings, respectively. The difference in cancer detection after recall (discordant pair 11 and 5) was not significant (McNemar test, P = 0.21). Of the 10 interval cancers and 16 screen-detected cancers in the subsequent round, 3 had true-positive SFM scores while 4 had true-positive FFDM scores in the initial reading session. A total of 38 cancers therefore had a positive result at double reading at one or both modalities, 31 at SFM and 27 at FFDM (McNemar test, P = 0.48). Comparison of SFM and FFDM interpretations using the mean score for each case revealed no statistically significant difference between the two modalities (Wilcoxon signed-rank test for matched pairs; P-value = 0.228). Two initial round cancers (one tumor found incidentally at work-up for a mass proved to be a simple cyst with a positive score at FFDM but a negative score at SFM, and one tumor with positive score at SFM but negative score at FFDM due to positioning failure) were excluded from the further analysis. Excluding these two cancers from comparison, there were 31% (22 of 72) false-negative SFM and 47% (34 of 72) false-negative FFDM individual interpretations. The overall mean interpretation time for normal FFDM examinations was 45 s. For most false-negative FFDM results, the reading time was shorter or longer than for normal examinations. The recorded FFDM interpretation time was noticeably short for several overlooked cancers manifesting as microcalcifications (ductal carcinoma in situ).

Conclusion: There is no statistically significant difference in cancer detection rate between SFM and FFDM with soft-copy reading in a mammography screening program. Analysis of cancers missed at FFDM with soft-copy reading indicates that close attention has to be paid to systematic use of image display protocols.