Laparoscopic transhiatal surgery of the esophagus.

OBJECTIVE: Esophagectomy is an operation with high morbidity and mortality. Its adoption as a minimally invasive operation worldwide has been slow, but the potential benefits of reducing the trauma of surgery need to be considered. Our 30-month experience with transhiatal esophagectomy in a district general hospital is presented herein. METHODS: Patients were considered for surgery after radiological staging had excluded inoperable disease. Laparoscopic staging was initially performed. Patients with tumors of the esophagus and high-grade dysplasia in a Barrett's esophagus were included. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients were referred for consideration for resectional surgery. Nine underwent outpatient laparoscopy only. Twenty patients (age range, 34 to 78, 15 males:5 females) underwent resectional surgery. Seventeen transhiatal resections were completed, 2 were converted to open procedures, and 1 transhiatal resection of a benign tumor was performed. Median time of surgery was 415 minutes (range, 320 to 480) and blood loss was 300 mL (range, 200 to 350). The median length of post-operative ventilation and critical care stay were 1 (range, 1 to 4) and 4 (range, 2 to 8) days. Median duration of hospitalization was 17 days (range, 10 to 28). Thirty-day mortality was 0; 1 patient who was converted to an open procedure died after a cerebrovascular event on day 34. CONCLUSION: A zero mortality rate for laparoscopic resection and a low-morbidity rate compare well with morbidity and mortality in reported series using this method and open surgery. Laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy is an advanced, complex procedure that can be performed safely in a district general hospital setting.     

Mental health in higher education students and non-students: evidence from a nationally representative panel study

Despite increasing policy focus on mental health provision for higher education students, it is unclear whether they have worse mental health outcomes than their non-student peers. In a nationally-representative UK study spanning 2010–2019 (N = 11,519), 17–24 year olds who attended higher education had lower average psychological distress (GHQ score difference =  − 0.37, 95% CI − 0.60, − 0.08) and lower odds of case-level distress than those who did not (OR = 0.91, 95% CI 0.81, 1.02). Increases in distress between 2010 and 2019 were similar in both groups. Accessible mental health support outside higher education settings is necessary to prevent further widening of socioeconomic inequalities in mental health.

     

Commentary on the management of total laryngectomy patients during the COVID‐19 pandemic

The coronavirus disease‐2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic has rapidly spread across the world, placing unprecedented strain on the health care system. Health care resources including hospital beds, ICUs, as well as personal protective equipment are becoming increasingly rationed and scare commodities. In this environment, the laryngectomee (patient having previously undergone a total laryngectomy) continues to represent a unique patient with unique needs. Given their surgically altered airway, they pose a challenge to manage for the otolaryngologist within the current COVID‐19 pandemic. In this brief report, we present special considerations and best practice recommendations in the management of total laryngectomy patients. We also discuss recommendations for laryngectomy patients and minimizing community exposures.     

Bone marrow blood supply in gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging

A retrospective study was performed to determine whether bone blood supply can be assessed on gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations of 49 patients attending for post-laminectomy examination were reviewed (30 male, 19 female, mean age 46.4 years, age range 23–84 years). Each study included sagittal T1-weighted spin echo sequences before and after gadolinium administration. Regions of interest were drawn within the L3 vertebral body from a parasagittal slice from each sequence. Signal intensity (SI) values were ascertained and the percentage increase in SI was calculated. For each patient, changes in receiver gain for pre and post-gadolinium images were corrected by an image scaling factor. In all cases, a measurable increase in SI was found (mean 15.3%, range 4.4–55.7) due to bone vascularity. The results give no indication of the quantity or timing of blood supply but provide a basis for further work.     

The Surgical Risk Scale as an improved tool for risk-adjusted analysis in comparative surgical audit

BACKGROUND: Comparative surgical audit is becoming increasingly important although it is fraught with difficulties due to risk-adjusted analysis. Methods have been proposed to solve this problem and allow meaningful comparison of patient outcome. None has been described without faults, making such comparison flawed or overtly complicated. An alternative risk scoring system incorporating the Confidential Enquiry into Perioperative Deaths (CEPOD) grade, the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade and the British United Provident Association (BUPA) operative grade was formulated and assessed. METHODS: This was a prospective audit of 4308 patients admitted under the care of three surgeons between May 1997 and October 1999, creating an initial data set of 3144 procedures with 134 deaths. Each procedure was allocated a score on the basis of the CEPOD, BUPA and ASA grade. The Surgical Risk Scale (SRS) was devised by adding together the values of the three variables, which generated a scale ranging from 3 to 14. Multivariate logistic regression analysis involving the three variables and univariate analysis of the SRS score were undertaken. Receiver-operator characteristic and calibration curves were formulated. This process was validated on another data set (2780 patients) derived from all admissions to the same surgeons between November 1999 and December 2000. RESULTS: Univariate logistic analysis of the SRS score revealed it to be significantly predictive of death (beta = 0.84, P < 0.001); it did not overpredict mortality for low-risk procedures. CONCLUSION: The SRS is easy to use, formulate and interpret, and provides an accurate prediction of death in general surgical patients across the entire risk spectrum.     

Surgical skill is predicted by the ability to detect errors

BACKGROUND: Objective analysis methods of surgical performance are now available so comparison between surgeons is available. One such method is by direct observation using the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS), but this is a time-consuming process; therefore, a simple screening tool for the ability to detect errors (previously validated) was analyzed and considered as a predictor of qualitative performance. METHODS: Thirty-eight volunteer surgeons were recruited to the skills laboratory to undertake 3 exercises. Two were bench-top surgical tasks that were scored using the global rating of the OSATS technique. The third task was the ability to detect simple errors in 22 synthetic models of common surgical procedures, some of which contained purposefully made errors. P<.05 was deemed to be statistically significant. RESULTS: The scores (interquartile ranges in parentheses) for the 3 sections were excision of sebaceous cyst=21 (19,24), closure of small bowel enterotomy=23 (21,27), and identification of errors=31 (27,34). Three scorers blinded to the operative models exhibited an interobserver reliability of .9 and .91 for the video tasks, respectively. Spearman's rank correlations between the error examination and performance on the 2 tasks were both statistically significant at .69 (cystectomy) and .54 (enterotomy). CONCLUSIONS: The ability to detect simple surgical errors is a predictor of technical skill and performance of bench tasks. What must be answered is whether the use of such models and principles can shorten the qualitative surgical learning curve.     

Validity and reliability of a virtual reality upper gastrointestinal simulator and cross validation using structured assessment of individual performance with video playback

Background: This study aims to evaluate the ability of an upper gastrointestinal virtual reality simulator to assess skills in endoscopy, and to validate its metrics using a video-endoscopic (VES) technique. Methods: The 32 participants in this study were requested to undertake two cases on the simulator (Simbionix, Israel). Each module was repeated twice. The simulators metrics of performance were used for analysis. Two blinded observers rated performance watching the simulators playback feature. Results: There were 11 novices (group 1), 11 trainees with intermediate experience (10–50 procedures, group 2), and 10 experienced endoscopists (>200 procedures, group 3). There was a significant difference in the total time required to perform the procedure (p < 0.001), percentage of mucosa visualized (p < 0.001), percentage of pathologies visualized (p < 0.001), and number of inappropriate retroflexions (p = 0.015) across the three groups. The reliability of assessment on the simulator was greater than 0.80 for all parameters. The VES assessment also was able to discriminate performance across the groups (p < 0.001). There was a significant correlation between the VES score and the percentage of mucosa visualized (rho = 0.60; p < 0.001). Conclusions: The upper gastrointestinal simulator may be a useful tool for determining whether a trainee has achieved a desired level of competence in endoscopy. The next step will be to validate the VES score in real procedures. Presented as a poster at the annual meeting of the Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Los Angeles, 10–15 March 2003