Impact of a practice guideline for patients with atrial fibrillation on medical resource utilization and costs

Health care resource utilization is high for patients presenting with acute atrial fibrillation (AF). The potential for treatment algorithms to safely reduce resource consumption in this setting has not been prospectively evaluated. We designed and implemented a practice guideline for the management of patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with the primary diagnosis of AF, with emphasis on appropriate cardioversion, use of oral rate-controlling medications, and expedited referral to an outpatient AF clinic. We prospectively collected clinical and resource utilization data on all such patients for 14 months before and after institution of the guideline. Institution of the guideline was associated with a decreased rate of hospital admission (from 74% to 38%), with no differences in ED return visits or hospital readmission within 30 days. No strokes or deaths were observed. This large decrease in resource utilization during the intervention phase of the study translated to an average decrease in 30-day total direct health care costs of approximately $1,400 US dollars per patient. Our clinical and cost outcomes were minimally affected after statistical adjustment for baseline differences between study groups. We conclude that the implementation of our practice guideline was feasible, safe, and effective. Widespread adoption of such practices may have large financial implications for the health care system.     

Accuracy of on-line databases in determining vital status

Ascertainment of vital status is important for epidemiological and clinical trial research. Two free databases based on the Social Security Administration Death Master File have become available on the Internet. The accuracy of these databases is unknown. A cohort of 124 patients known to be dead and a cohort of 203 patients not known to be dead were identified. The on-line databases were searched with both of these cohorts following a specific search algorithm. The results for both on-line databases were identical. The optimal algorithm had a sensitivity of 0.82 (95% confidence interval 0.74–0.89) for identification of deaths. The sensitivity excluding deaths that occurred during the first year of life (n = 118) was 0.86 (95% CI 0.79–0.92). The specificity was 1.00. This study found that free and convenient on-line databases based on the Social Security Administration Death Master File can be useful in the accurate ascertainment of vital status.     

Clinical and economic outcomes of multivessel coronary stenting compared with bypass surgery: a single-center US experience

Background Randomized trials comparing multivessel stenting with coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) have demonstrated similar rates of death and myocardial infarction but higher rates of repeat revascularization after stenting. The impact of these alternative strategies on overall medical care costs is uncertain, particularly within the US health care system. Methods We performed a retrospective, matched cohort study to compare the clinical and economic outcomes of multivessel stenting and bypass surgery. The stent group consisted of 100 consecutive patients who underwent stenting of ≥2 major native coronary arteries at our institution. The CABG group consisted of 200 patients who underwent nonemergent isolated bypass surgery during the same time frame, matched (2:1) for age, sex, ejection fraction, diabetes mellitus, and extent of coronary disease. Detailed clinical follow-up and resource utilization data were collected for a minimum of 2 years. Total costs were calculated by use of year 2000 unit prices. Results Over a median follow up period of 2.8 years, there were no significant differences in all-cause mortality rates (3.0% vs 3.0%), Q-wave myocardial infarction (5.1% vs 4.0%), or the composite of death or myocardial infarction (7.1% vs 7.0%) between the stent and CABG groups (P = not significant for all comparisons). However, at 2-year follow up, patients with stents were more likely to require ≥1 repeat revascularization procedure (32.0% vs 4.5%, P < .001). The initial cost of multivessel stenting was 43% less than the cost of CABG ($11,810 vs $20,574, P < .001) and remained 27% less ($17,634 vs $24,288, P = .005) at 2 years. Conclusions Multivessel stenting and CABG result in comparable risks of death and myocardial infarction. Despite a higher rate of repeat revascularization, multivessel stenting was significantly less costly than CABG through the first 2 years of follow-up. (Am Heart J 2003;145:334-42.)     

Effects of stent length and lesion length on coronary restenosis

The choice of drug-eluting versus bare metal stents is based on costs and expectations of restenosis and thrombosis risk. Approaches to stent placement vary from covering just the zone of maximal obstruction to stenting well beyond the lesion boundaries (normal-to-normal vessel). The independent effects of stented lesion length, nonstented lesion length, and excess stent length, on coronary restenosis have not been evaluated for bare metal or drug-eluting stents. We analyzed the angiographic follow-up cohort (1,181 patients) from 6 recent bare metal stent trials of de novo lesions in native coronary arteries. Stent length exceeded lesion length in 87% of lesions (mean lesion length 12.4 +/- 6.3 mm, mean stent length 20.0 +/- 7.9 mm, mean difference 7.6 +/- 7.9 mm). At 6- to 9-month follow-up, the mean percent diameter stenosis was 39.1 +/- 20.1%. In an adjusted multivariable model of percent diameter stenosis, each 10 mm of stented lesion length was associated with an absolute increase in percent diameter stenosis of 7.7% (p <0.0001), whereas each 10 mm of excess stent length independently increased percent diameter stenosis by 4.0% (p <0.0001) and increased target lesion revascularization at 9 months (odds ratio 1.12, 95% confidence interval 1.02 to 1.24). Significant nonstented lesion length was uncommon (12.5% of cases). In summary, stent length exceeded lesion length in most stented lesions, and the amount of excess stent length increased the risk of restenosis independent of the stented lesion length. This analysis supports a conservative approach of matching stent length to lesion length to reduce the risk of restenosis with bare metal stents.