Fluconazole dosing in continuous veno-venous haemofiltration (CVVHF): need for a high daily dose of 800 mg

To cover intermediate sensitive Candida glabrata in ICU patients,fluconazole plasma peak levels at least in the range of 16–32µg/ml appear necessary for treatment. Previous studiesdid not reach these fluconazole levels under continuous veno-venoushaemofiltration (CVVHF) with dosages of 200–600 mg fluconzoledaily. In the present study, nine patients simultaneously requiringCVVHF for treatment of acute oligoanuric renal failure and antimycotictherapy of Candida septicemia received fluconazole 800 mg/day.Fluconazole plasma levels were determined to evaluate whetherthis dosage is adequate to reach the advised fluconazole levels.Patients were dialysed on two consecutive days with an ultrafiltrationrate (UF) of 1000 ml/h or 2000 ml/h, respectively, in a randomizedorder. The predilution was 800 ml/h and 1800 ml/h, respectively.The treatment was tolerated without adverse effects. All patientsreached plasma fluconazole concentrations between 16 and 32µg/ml, remaining in this range for a minimum of 1 up to24 h with a mean of 9.6 h and a UF rate of 2000 ml/h, and 15.7h with a UF rate of 1000 ml/h. So far, there are no in vivodata on the fluconazole plasma concentrations required for effectivetreatment. However, our data demonstrate, that at least thefluconazole concentrations desirable on the basis of in vitrosusceptibility testing can be reached in critically ill patientson CVVHF in an ICU setting. However, in these patients, 800mg fluconazole/day are necessary to achieve fungicidal drugconcentrations.     

Sequential 99mTc-hydrazinonicotinamide-annexin V imaging for predicting response to chemotherapy.

This study was undertaken to evaluate changes in relative (99m)Tc-hydrazinonicotinamide (HYNIC)-annexin V tumor uptake over time in patients undergoing chemotherapeutic treatment at baseline and at 5-7 h and 40-44 h after treatment initiation. Imaging results are related to clinical outcomes, as assessed with response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST). METHODS: We prospectively included 20 patients (11 men and 9 women; mean age, 59.8 y; range, 22-75 y) scheduled for chemotherapy (n = 19) or bisphosphonate treatment (n = 1). Curable disease was present in 5 patients. The other patients had metastatic disease and were treated in a palliative setting. Three of the 20 enrolled patients were excluded from analysis: 1 patient ultimately refused the proposed chemotherapy treatment; because of difficulties with the labeling procedure, 1 patient did not receive a pretreatment scan; and 1 patient presented with an allergic reaction (rash and nausea) to the (99m)Tc-HYNIC-annexin V formulation. The remaining 17 patients underwent 3 scintigraphic scans with (99m)Tc-HYNIC-annexin V: before treatment and 5-7 h and 40-44 h after treatment initiation. The tumor response was evaluated with RECIST and related to observed changes in the ratios of tumor activity to background activity for the largest known lesion; values exceeding 25% the baseline value on either the 5- to 7-h scan or the 40- to 44-h scan were considered significant. RESULTS: With the proposed sequential imaging protocol and a 25% change threshold, responders to treatment could be separated from nonresponders with a 94% accuracy (16/17 patients). CONCLUSION: Sequential (99m)Tc-HYNIC-annexin V imaging may allow for assessment of the response to chemotherapy within 3 d after treatment initiation.     

Buchbesprechungen

Ohne Zusammenfassung     

Follow-up data of our pilot study on concomitant hyperfractionated radiotherapy and cisplatinum (CDDP) in patients with advanced cancer of the head and neck.

Since 1988, 52 patients with stage III/IV squamous cell cancer of the head and neck have been treated by concomitant irradiation with 2 x 1.2 Gy/d on five days per week up to a total dose between 72 and 76.8 Gy without split and 5 x 20 mg/m2 cisplatinum (CDDP) as short infusion finished approximately 30 min before the second session on five days of the first and the fifth week of radiotherapy. Radiotherapy has been suspended after 30 and 50 Gy in three patients for insufficient response. In all other patients, radiotherapy has been completed. Due to a slow haematologic recovery, 34% of the patients received only one cycle of CDDP Grade 3 mucositis, occurring during radiotherapy in all patients, healed in a couple of weeks after radiotherapy. Three patients have a persisting ulcer between eight and 36 months after radiotherapy with biopsies negative for tumour and also no other signs of tumour. The ulcers are situated in the region of the former primary tumour with an extensive destruction of tissue already before radiotherapy (cumulative risk of this complication after three years 8%). There were no other major complication. Cumulative local control after three years was 67% (75% including salvage surgery in two patients) with a plateau after twelve months. Total survival after three years was 62%. For the whole follow-up period, local control in the region of the primary tumour after radiotherapy was: 19/29 (T4), 10/15 (T3), 7/10 (T1 + 2, including salvage surgery: 8/10). Local control in the region of the nodal metastasis after radiotherapy was: 5/14 (N3, including salvage surgery: 6/14). 18/21 (N2) and 6/8 (N1).     

Combined Administration of Meningococcal Serogroup B Outer Membrane Vesicle Vaccine and Conjugated Serogroup C Vaccine Indicated for Prevention of Meningococcal Disease Is Safe and Immunogenic

MenBvac and Menjugate are safe and efficacious vaccines. The purpose of this study was to evaluate safety and immunogenicity of the combination (MenB/C) of the lyophilized active components of the conjugated group C vaccine Menjugate when reconstituted with the full liquid group B outer membrane vesicle vaccine MenBvac compared to MenBvac and Menjugate given separately. At 6-week intervals, healthy adults were given one dose of MenB/C followed by two doses of MenBvac (MenB/C group), three doses of MenBvac (MenB group), or one dose of Menjugate and two doses of placebo (MenC group). Injection site reactions were frequent in all groups. However, most reactions were short lasting and mild or moderate in intensity, and the vaccines were found to be well tolerated, with no vaccine-related serious adverse events. MenB/C was immunogenic with regard to both serogroup B and C meningococci. Both the serum bactericidal assay and the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay analyses showed that the immune responses of the combination vaccine were similar to the immune responses of its separate components MenBvac and Menjugate for both serogroup B and C. In conclusion, the combined MenB/C vaccine is safe and immunogenic. The two vaccines do not interact negatively with each other and can easily be administered in the same syringe. The induced immune responses suggest that the combined vaccine is likely to confer protection against systemic group B disease caused by the vaccine strain as well as against group C meningococcal disease.