Left ventricular outflow tract obstruction with mitral valve replacement in small ventricular cavities

The inference that mitral valve replacement (MVR) may produce left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction has been made, but no comparative hemodynamic studies with various types of prostheses have been done. The purpose of the present study was to compare the gradients created across the LVOT with MVR in young sheep with small left ventricular cavities. Mitral valve replacement was accomplished using cardiopulmonary bypass and hypothermic cardioplegic arrest. Five animals were used for each of the following valves studied: 25-mm Ionescu-Shiley bovine pericardial valve, 25-mm Hancock porcine aortic valve, 2M-6120 28-mm Starr-Edwards ball-valve prosthesis, 25-mm Bj?rk-Shiley 60-degree flat tilting-disc prosthesis, and 25-mm St. Jude Medical hemidisc valve. Gradients across the LVOT were measured after MVR and then during infusion of isoproterenol hydrochloride (0.05 micrograms/kg/min). Following MVR, only the Starr-Edwards valve produced an LVOT gradient (32 +/- 23 mm Hg). Substantial gradients after MVR were seen, however, with isoproterenol administration with the Ionescu-Shiley (47 +/- 4 mm Hg), Hancock (13 +/- 8 mm Hg), and Starr-Edwards (65 +/- 30 mm Hg) valves but not with the low-profile valves (Bj?rk-Shiley and St. Jude Medical). The results of the present study demonstrate that MVR can produce LVOT obstruction. The greatest degree of obstruction was with the high-profile mechanical and bioprosthetic valves.     

Clinical risk factors for fractures in multi-ethnic women: the Women's Health Initiative.

To identify risk factors for fractures in multi-ethnic women, we studied 159,579 women enrolled in the Women's Health Initiative. In general, risk factors for fractures were similar across ethnic groups. However, irrespective of their ethnicity, women with multiple risk factors have a high risk of fracture. Targeting these high-risk women for screening and intervention could reduce fractures. INTRODUCTION: Fracture rates tend to be lower in minority women, but consequences may be greater. In addition, the number of fractures is expected to increase in minority women because of current demographic trends. There are limited prospective data on risk factors for fractures in minority women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 159,579 women 50-79 yr of age enrolled in the Women's Health Initiative. Information on risk factors was obtained by questionnaire or examination. Nonspine fractures that occurred after study entry were identified over an average follow-up of 8 +/- 2.6 (SD) yr. RESULTS: Annualized rates (%) of fracture in whites, blacks, Hispanics, Asians, and American Indians were 2.0, 0.9, 1.3, 1.2, and 2.0, respectively. Significant predictors [HR (95% CI)] of fractures by ethnic group were as follows: blacks: at least a high school education, 1.22 (1.0, 1.5); (+) fracture history, 1.7 (1.4, 2.2); and more than two falls, 1.7 (1.9, 2.0); Hispanics: height (>162 cm), 1.6 (1.1, 2.2); (+) fracture history, 1.9 (1.4, 2.5); more than two falls, 1.8 (1.4, 2.3); arthritis, 1.3 (1.1, 1.6); corticosteroid use, 3.9 (1.9, 8.0); and parental history of fracture, 1.3 (1.0, 1.6); Asians: age (per 5 yr), 1.2 (1.0, 1.3); (+) fracture history, 1.5 (1.1, 2.0); current hormone therapy (HT), 0.7 (0.5, 0.8); parity (at least five), 1.8 (1.1, 3.0); more than two falls, 1.4 (1.1, 1.9); American Indian: (+) fracture history, 2. 9 (1.5, 5.7); current HT, 0.5 (0.3, 0.9). Women with eight or more risk factors had more than a 2-fold higher rate of fracture compared with women with four or fewer risk factors. Two ethnicity x risk factor interactions were identified: age and fall history. CONCLUSIONS: Irrespective of their ethnicity, women with multiple risk factors have a high risk of fracture. Targeting these high-risk women for screening and intervention could reduce fractures.     

Selective drainage for pancreatic, biliary, and duodenal obstruction secondary to chronic fibrosing pancreatitis.

Twenty-eight patients underwent surgery for intractable pain, duodenal or extrahepatic biliary obstruction secondary to chronic pancreatitis. Eleven had pancreatic duct obstruction alone, six biliary obstruction alone, seven combined pancreatic and biliary, two combined biliary and duodenal, one combined pancreatic and duodenal, and one simultaneous pancreatic, biliary, and duodenal obstruction. Pancreatitis was secondary to alcohol in all but one case. The following operations were performed: longitudinal pancreatojejunostomy (20), choledochoduodenostomy (8), choledochojejunostomy (7), cholecystojejunostomy (1), and gastrojejunostomy (4). Of the 20 patients with pancreatic duct drainage, pain relief was complete in 11 and partial in six. Initial incomplete relief of pain, or recurrence, stimulated further diagnostic procedures, leading to improvement or correction of the problem in five patients. A significant (p less than 0.01) fall in alkaline phosphatase (935 +/- 228 to 219 +/- 61 U/L) occurred following surgery. One patient was subsequently found to have pancreatic carcinoma. Two patients were lost to follow-up and four patients died (one perioperative and three late). In conclusion, the possibility of pancreatic, biliary, and duodenal obstruction must be considered in symptomatic patients with chronic pancreatitis. Surgery must be individualized. Drainage procedures, either alone or in combination, are associated with a low morbidity and improved clinical condition and may be preferable to resection in the surgical management of these patients.