SUCCESSFUL ENDOSCOPIC CLOSURES OF COLONIC PERFORATIONS REQUIRING ABDOMINAL DECOMPRESSION AFTER ENDOSCOPIC MUCOSAL RESECTION AND ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION FOR EARLY COLON CANCER

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for colorectal cancer is not widely accepted because of its technical difficulty and the risk of perforation. In addition, the risk of peritonitis cannot be completely eliminated even if a perforation is closed successfully. Reported here are two cases of early colon cancer in which the patients sustained iatrogenic perforations of the ascending colon during conventional endoscopic mucosal resection and of the sigmoid colon during ESD, respectively, requiring abdominal decompression with an 18 G Medicut needle. Both of these perforations were successfully treated by endoscopic clipping. In conclusion, conservative medical management may be possible in patients who have undergone successful closure of colonic perforations using endoscopic clipping. In order to perform immediate endoscopic closure, abdominal decompression has been useful to decrease patient discomfort and colonic lumen collapse. Now, CO₂ insufflation is being used effectively for the prevention of pneumoperitoneum.     

Is endoscopic one‐piece mucosal resection essential for early gastric cancer?

Background: Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is widely accepted as a minimally invasive treatment for early gastric cancer (EGC) in Japan. However, the criteria for EMR must be strictly adhered to otherwise patients will miss the chance for additional therapy. We assess the important factor in expanding the indication of EMR. Methods: We investigated 1101 EGCs that had been resected by EMR at the National Cancer Center Hospital (NCCH), Tokyo, Japan, according to the indication recommended by Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (JGCA) and the expanded indication proposed by NCCH. Curability and local recurrence of the EMRs were assessed related to the applied indication and the number of resected specimens. Results: The recurrence rate of non‐evaluable resection was higher than that of evaluable resection (P < 0.0001). Eighty‐three lesions among 772 lesions in the JGCA group were non‐evaluable. Thirty‐seven leisons among 329 lesions in the NCCH group were non‐evaluable. There was no difference in the rate of non‐evaluable resection between JGCA and NCCH groups (P = 0.8329). However, the rate of curative resection was lower in the NCCH group than in the JGCA group (P = 0.0009). In piecemeal resection, there was no difference in the rate of non‐evaluable resection between JGCA and NCCH groups (P = 0.0527). In one‐piece resection, the rate of non‐evaluable resection was lower in the NCCH group than the JGCA group (P = 0.0137). Conclusion: Based on our series of cases, we propose one‐piece resection as a gold standard for EMR because it enables accurate histological evaluation, even in the EMR, according to the expanded indication.     

Early experience with laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection

Background: Laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection (LAPR) has not been fully evaluated as a technique in the treatment of rectal and anal cancer or inflammatory bowel disease. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the early experience with laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection at Washington University Medical Center. Methods: A prospective analysis was performed on the first 21 patients undergoing the procedure at Washington University Medical Center. Indications for surgery included rectal cancer (14 patients), anal squamous cell cancer (four patients), inflammatory bowel disease (two patients), and anal melanoma (one patient). Results: The procedure was converted to open procedure in four patients (19%). The mean (±SEM) operative time and blood loss for completed and converted LAPR were 239 ± 11 min and 424 ± 43 ml, respectively. Postoperative hematocrit dropped a mean of 8.3% ± 1.2% SEM; five patients required blood transfusion (24%). Wound complication occurred in four patients (19%; three perineal, one trocar site). Bowel function returned after a mean of 3 days, and mean postoperative hospital stay for the completed LAPR group was 5 days. Mild pain was experienced by 81% of patients (17/21) while 19% (4/21) noted moderate pain, usually of the perineal wound. The mean duration of patient-controlled analgesia use was 2 days. During the 1–44-month follow-up, six patients (29%) died from cancer (stage III or IV at operation) and only one patient developed local recurrence in the pelvis (5%). There were no trocar-site implants of cancer. Furthermore, there was no relationship between prior abdominal operations, the amount of blood loss, postoperative drop of hematocrit, or blood transfusion requirement and the length of hospitalization or complication rates. Conclusion: Laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection is a feasible alternative to the conventional open technique in both cancer and colitis patients. Received: 23 April 1996/Accepted: 8 July 1996     

Clinical and manometric evaluation of anorectal function following low anterior resection with low anastomotic line using an EEA™ stapler for rectal cancer

Anorectal function was evaluated in eight patients who had low anterior resection of the rectum with a low anastomotic line, using an EEA^™ stapler, with determination of function based on periodic manometric studies and clinical symptoms. Immediately following surgery all patients suffered from frequent bowel actions and soiling. These symptoms improved with time and most patients could enjoy almost normal daily life by the sixth postoperative month. One month after surgery, anal canal resting pressure and maximum squeeze pressure were significantly reduced and rectoanal inhibitory reflex was absent; neither showed a distinct tendency to improve thereafter. Rectal sensation and reservoir capacity, which also were seriously impaired, recovered satisfactorily by the time of the six-month examination. This suggests that an improvement of clinical symptoms following this operation is dependent upon the recovery of reservoir capacity and sensation of the neorectum, and that this operative procedure is a functionally acceptable option for low rectal cancer.     

Evaluation of an aortic stent graft for use in surgery on esophageal cancer involving the thoracic aorta

Objective: The purpose of this experimental study was to investigate whether aortic stent grafting can be applied to the treatment of an esophageal cancer involving the thoracic aorta. Methods: The canine thoracic aorta was partially resected without aorta being clamped after emplacement of an endovascular stent graft. Study I; The aortic whole layer of 1 cm in length and 1/4 of the circumference was resected and was covered by a free fascia patch of the abdominal rectal muscle immediately after stent graft placement. Study II; The aortic adventitia and the outer half of the media of the same size was resected on day 3, 7,14, 21, and on day 28, after the stent graft placement. The resected portion was covered by the free fascia patch in half experimental dogs, and was uncovered in the others. Study III; The aortic adventitia and the outer half of the media of 1 cm in length and 1/2 of the circumference was resected and was uncovered on day 7 after stent graft placement. Histological examinations were performed on day 28 and at one year after aortic resection. Results: The aortic wall could be resected in all cases with no complication, except in resection of 1/2 the circumference where the aorta had become narrow. There was no difference in healing of the resected portion of the aorta between with and without fascia covering. Conclusion: An aortic endovascular stent graft could be applied to surgery for an esophageal cancer involving the aorta.     

Clinical studies on the transabdominal resection of esophagocardial cancer and cervical anastomosis using bypass methods. Analysis of data on 76 patients

Transabdominal resection for esophagocardial cancer and reestablishment of alimentary continuity using bypass methods were performed in 76 patients. Thirteen underwent a bypass with a gastric tube and in 30, a colonic segment was prepared. In the remaining 33, a jejunal segment was used as a bypass organ, with considerable success. The 5 year survival rates were 68.8 per cent in those with stages (I+II), 16.5 per cent in those with stage III, 12.6 per cent in those with stage IV and 22.5 per cent in all cases, indicating similar results compared to those with cancer located in the upper third of the stomach with the limited proximal extension within the esophagocardial junction and operated on during the same period.     

Plädoyer für die primäre Resektion mit primärer Anastomose bei der komplizierten Sigmadiverticulitis

Zusammenfassung Von 1973 bis 1986 wurden 107 Patienten mit einer komplizierten Sigmadiverticulitis operiert. Es handelte sich um 47 Frauen und 60 Männer bei einem Durchschnittsalter von 62 Jahren. Von 107 Patienten wiesen 14 eine perforierte Diverticulitis mit diffuser eitriger/kotiger Peritonitis auf, 68 Patienten eine perforierte Diverticulitis mit lokalisierter eitriger Peritonitis/paracolischem Absceß und 25 Patienten eine akute phlegmonöse Diverticulitis ohne Perforation. Zusätzliche pathologische Befunde waren: innere Fisteln (13 Patienten), nekrotisierende Fasciitis (3 Patienten), Stenose mit Ileus (3 Patienten) und synchrone Carcinome (7 Patienten). Die Gesamtletalität der 107 Patienten betrug 9,3% (=10 Patienten), die Morbidität der 97 überlebenden Patienten 34,0% (= 33 Patienten). Die Letalität bei 14 Patienten mit perforierter Diverticulitis und diffuser eitriger/kotiger Peritonitis lag bei 50%, die der 68 Patienten mit perforierter Diverticulitis und lokaler eitriger Peritonitis/ paracolischem Absceß bei 4,4%, die der 25 Patienten mit akuter phlegmonöser Diverticulitis ohne Perforation bei 0%. Von den 10 Patienten verstarben 7 bei Operation ihrer perforierten Diverticulitis mit diffuser eitriger Peritonitis, 1 (5) nach primärer Resektion mit primärer Anastomose, 3 (5) nach Operation nach Hartmann, 3 (4) nach alleiniger Anlage einer Colostomie. Bei Operation der perforierten Diverticulitis mit lokaler Peritonitis verstarben 3 Patienten, 2 (6) nach Operation nach Hartman und 1 (5) nach alleiniger Anlage einer Colostomie. Trotz einer hohen Zunahme der Zahl primärer Resektionen mit primärer Anasto mose im Zeitraum 1980–1986 ergab sich im Vergleich zum 7-Jahresabschnitt 1973–1979 ein Rückgang der Letalität von 35,7% auf 0% bei dieser Operation. Ihre Anwendung ist auch gerechtfertigt bei der perforierten Diverticulitis mit lokaler wie diffus eitriger oder kotiger Peritonitis.

---

Primary resection with primary anastomosis in complicated diverticulitis of the sigma

Summary Of the 107 patients with complicated diverticulitis operated from 1973–1986 47 were females and 60 males. In 14 of the 107 patients a perforated diverticulitis with diffuse purulent/faecal peritonitis was found, a perforated diverticulitis with localized purulent peritonitis/paracolic abscess in 68 patients and an acute phlegmonous diverticulitis without perforation in 25 patients. Additional pathologic findings were internal fistulae (13 patients), necrotizing fasciitis (3 patients), obstruction (3 patients) and synchronous carcinoma (7 patients). The overall mortality of the 107 patients was 9.3 % (=10 patients) and the morbidity of the 97 survivors 34% (=33 patients). The mortality of the 1.4 patients with perforated diverticulitis and diffuse purulent peritonitis was 50%, of the 68 patients with perforated diverticulitis and localized purulent peritonitis 4.4% and of the 25 patients with acute phlegmonous diverticulitis 0%. Seven of the 10 patients died after operation of the perforated diverticulitis with diffuse purulent peritonitis — 1 (5) after primary resection with primary anastomosis, 3 (5) after Hartmann procedure, 3 (4) after loop colostomy alone. Three patients died after operation of the perforated diverticulitis with localized purulent peritonitis — 2 (6) after Hartmann procedure, 1 (5) after loop colostomy alone. In spite of forcing the primary resection with primary anastomosis in the years from 1980–1986 the mortality decreased for these operations from 35.7% in 1973–1979 to 0% in 1980–1986. The indication of primary resection with primary anas tomosis is justified also for perforated diverticulitis with localized and diffuse peritonitis.

Auszugsweise vorgetragen auf dem Symposium Entzündliche Darmerkrankungen der Medizinischen Akademie Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, 20. November 1987     

Cyclooxygenase-2 expression in colorectal cancer liver metastases

Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) is up-regulated in 85-90% of primary human colorectal cancers and is a putative target for the chemopreventative activity of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. However, COX-2 expression by human colorectal cancer liver metastases has been poorly characterized. We studied a consecutive series of 38 patients who underwent liver resection for metastatic disease, for whom long-term (up to 57 months), prospective follow-up data were available. Semi-quantitative immunohistochemistry for COX-2 was performed on 54 metastases from 35 patients, for whom adequate histological material was available. Diffuse cytoplasmic staining for COX-2 protein was detected in cancer cells in 100% of metastases (COX-2 score 1, n=25; score 2, n=29). There was no relationship between metastasis size or differentiation grade and the level of COX-2 protein expression. There was no difference in colorectal cancer-free or overall survival between patients with high (score 2) and low (score 1) COX-2 scores (Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and log rank test, both P=0.97). Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified age, incomplete resection and presence of extra-hepatic disease as independent predictors of disease-free and overall survival following surgery. COX-2 protein was also localized to a subset of stromal fibroblasts and mononuclear cells within metastases as well as hepatocytes from resection specimens. COX-2 protein was expressed by cancer cells in all human colorectal cancer liver metastases which were studied. Investigation of the effect of selective COX-2 inhibition on metastasis growth and metastasis cancer cell proliferation/apoptosis in vivo are warranted.     

Volumetric reconstruction and stereotactic computer assisted resection in intracerebral lesions

Summary Since 1990 112 patients have undergone Stereotactic resection of intra-axial tumoural lesions with volumetric reconstruction, using the Kelly-Goerss system. Stereotactic integration of CT, angiographic and particularly MRI information, together with three-dimensional information of the lesion, provide an innovative evaluation of the most appropriate surgical approach, even for each single patient. The main limitation of this surgical method is in cases where the infiltrating part of the tumour is pre-eminent, while it can allow macroscopically complete resection of well circumscribed lesions, almost independently of their location and volume. Some technical aspects of Stereotactic resection of brain tumours are discussed in the light of our experience.     

The transurethral resection syndrome

The transurethral resection syndrome ("TUR syndrome") is caused by absorption of electrolyte-free irrigating fluid, and consists of symptoms from the circulatory and nervous systems. The clinical picture is inconsistent and the syndrome is easily confused with other acute disorders. Mild forms are common and often go undiagnosed, while severe forms of the TUR syndrome are rare and potentially life-threatening. The pathophysiology is complex but includes four mechanisms: circulatory distress from the rapid absorption of electrolyte-free irrigating fluid, adverse effects of glycine, dilution of the protein and electrolyte concentrations of the body fluids, and disturbance of renal function. The treatment of the TUR syndrome consists of general life support and in specific treatment directed towards hypotension, hyponatraemia and anuria. Methods to lower the uptake of irrigating fluid are widely used and probably reduce the incidence of the TUR syndrome. However, patient safety can be guaranteed only if the absorption is monitored. An irrigating fluid containing tracer amounts of ethanol can be used for this purpose. This permits the uptake of fluid to be indicated by measuring the concentration of ethanol in the patient's exhaled breath.