经粒系集落刺激因子刺激外周血CD34~+细胞动员效果相关因素的考察

目的探讨粒系集落刺激因子(G-CSF)动员健康供者外周血造血干细胞效果的影响因素。方法对24例健康供者皮下注射G-CSF动员造血干细胞,检测外周血T淋巴细胞亚群和血常规数据。结果经G-CSF刺激后,外周血CD3+(%)、CD3+CD4+(%)、白细胞计数、血小板均明显升高(P0.05);而动员第4天、第5天、第6天骨有核细胞密度、CD34+细胞百分比无明显差别。经相关性分析,性别、年龄、体质量与CD34+细胞百分比呈负相关(P0.05),白细胞计数呈正相关(P0.01)。结论在一定范围内男性供者优于女性供者,年龄越小,体质量越轻,白细胞计数越高,经G-CSF动员的外周血造血干细胞CD34+细胞百分比越高。     

急性肺损伤中炎症因子 IL-8与 RhoA 的相关性研究

目的：探讨油酸型急性肺损伤模型中IL‐8与RhoA的相关性。方法建立大鼠油酸急性肺损伤模型,检测各组大鼠肺湿／干重比及肺泡灌洗液（BALF）中中性粒细胞比例,比较肺组织病理学改变;采用聚合酶链反应检测肺组织匀浆RhoA表达,酶联免疫吸附法（ELISA ）测定大鼠IL‐8的变化。结果肺W／D损伤组在2、6、12、24 h均较正常组明显升高,并且损伤组2 h比值最高;损伤组各时间点BALF中中性粒细胞计数比例明显高于正常组,24 h中性粒细胞细胞比例达峰值;损伤组个时间点血浆及BALF中IL‐8较正常组明显升高,两者具有相关性;损伤组各时间点RhoA的表达明显高于正常组。结论油酸型急性肺损伤大鼠中存在RhoA的高表达,RhoA表达增加可致IL‐8的表达增加,进而引起炎症细胞浸润。     

Pulmonary alveolar proteinosis

PAP is an ultra‐rare disease in which surfactant components, that impair gas exchange, accumulate in the alveolae. There are three types of PAP. The most frequent form, primary PAP, includes autoimmune PAP which accounts for over 90% of all PAP, defined by the presence of circulating anti‐GM‐CSF antibodies. Secondary PAP is mainly due to haematological disease, infections or inhaling toxic substances, while genetic PAP affects almost exclusively children. PAP is suspected if investigation for ILD reveals a crazy‐paving pattern on chest CT scan, and is confirmed by a milky looking BAL that gives a positive PAS reaction indicating extracellular proteinaceous material. PAP is now rarely confirmed by surgical lung biopsy. WLL is still the first‐line treatment, with an inhaled GM‐CSF as second‐line treatment. Inhalation has been found to be better than subcutaneous injections. Other treatments, such as rituximab or plasmapheresis, seem to be less efficient or ineffective. The main complications of PAP are due to infections by standard pathogens (Streptococcus, Haemophilus and Enterobacteria) or opportunistic pathogens such as mycobacteria, Nocardia, Actinomyces, Aspergillus or Cryptococcus. The clinical course of PAP is unpredictable and spontaneous improvement can occur. The 5‐year actuarial survival rate is 95%.     

重组人粒细胞集落刺激因子对脑出血大鼠神经功能的影响

目的 探讨重组人粒细胞集落刺激因子(rhG-CSF)对脑出血大鼠神经功能的影响.方法 将48只SD大鼠按随机数字表法分为模型组和rhG-CSF治疗组,均应用大鼠脑立体定位仪注射自体不凝血法制作脑出血模型,其中rhG-CSF治疗组于造模后1h开始腹腔注射rhG-CSF[60μg/(kg· d)],模型组注射等量生理盐水.造模后第7天及第14天对2组大鼠分别进行神经功能评分,流式细胞仪检测外周血CD34+细胞的含量,免疫组化染色观察脑出血灶周围组织微管相关蛋白2 (MAP-2)的表达. 结果 rhG-CSF治疗组第7天及第14天的神经功能评分(0.407±0.057,0.649±0.014)、外周血CD34+细胞含量(0.381％±0.054％,0.205％±0.088％)及MAP-2表达(0.205±0.088,0.281±0.054)均明显高于模型组(0.168±0.066,0.326±0.047; 0.074％±0.028％,0.030％±0.057％;0.080±0.017,0.124±0.028),差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05). 结论 rhG-CSF可促进脑出血区神经细胞的增生和修复,对出血后脑组织具有保护作用,从而改善脑出血后神经功能.     

注射用重组人血清白蛋白-人粒细胞集落刺激因子(Ⅰ)融合蛋白在健康受试者的耐受性研究

目的评价重组(酵母分泌型)人血清白蛋白-人粒细胞集落刺激因子(Ⅰ)融合蛋白在健康受试者的耐受性和安全性。方法将26例健康受试者(男女各半)按先后顺序入组,进行4个剂量组试验(150,300,500,650μg·kg^-1),每组分别入组4,6,8,8例。根据体重计算给药剂量,受试者于给药当天上臂三角肌部位皮下注射给药1次。用药后观察药物不良事件(AE),定时进行实验室检查、心电图检查。结果共25例受试者发生AE,共145例次。150,300,500及650μg·kg^-1剂量组的AE分别为13,11,56和65例次。其中134例次考虑与研究药物相关。常见的AE有骨痛、单核细胞计数升高、血碱性磷酸酶升高、头痛、高尿酸血症、血乳酸脱氢酶升高、脾肿大、肌肉疲劳。研究中未出现AE导致的用药暂停、受试者退出或试验提前中止。未发生严重不良事件(SAE)。未发生剂量限制性毒性。结论注射用重组(酵母分泌型)人血清白蛋白-人粒细胞集落刺激因子(Ⅰ)融合蛋白在中国健康受试者中单次给药150,650μg·kg^-1剂量范围内有较好的安全性,本临床试验未探索到健康人群的最大耐受剂量。     

粒细胞巨噬细胞刺激因子联合全肺灌洗对特发性肺泡蛋白沉积症的疗效和安全性

目的 观察粒细胞巨噬细胞刺激因子（GM-CSF）联合全肺灌洗治疗特发性肺泡蛋白沉积症（IPAP）的疗效和安全性。方法 选取2015年8月至2017年3月在第二军医大学附属长海医院就诊的2例IPAP患者,经全肺灌洗后,分别予皮下注射和雾化吸入GM-CSF治疗,观察其疗效和安全性。结果 2例患者经GM-CSF联合全肺灌洗治疗,病情缓解。结论 GM-CSF联合全肺灌洗治疗对IPAP患者治疗有效、用药安全。     

Granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor improves neuron survival in experimental spinal cord injury by regulating nucleophosmin‐1 expression

Granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor (G‐CSF) and its related mechanisms were investigated to assess the potential for this factor to exert neuroprotective effects against spinal cord injury in mice. Recombinant human granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor (rhG‐CSF) was injected into mice spinal cord hemisection models. Locomotor activity was assessed by using the Basso‐Bettie‐Bresnahan scale. Neurons isolated from spinal cords were cultured in vitro and used in a neuronal mechanical injury model. Three treatment groups were compared with this model, 1) G‐CSF, 2) G‐CSF + NSC348884 (a nucleophosmin 1‐specific inhibitor), and 3) NSC348884. Immunofluorescence staining and Western blotting were performed to analyze the expression of G‐CSF and nucleophosmin 1 (Npm1). TUNEL staining was performed to analyze apoptosis after G‐CSF treatment. We found that the G‐CSF receptor (G‐CSFR) and Npm1 were expressed in neurons and that Npm1 expression was induced after G‐CSF treatment. G‐CSF inhibited neuronal apoptosis. NSC348884 induced p53‐dependent cell apoptosis and partially blocked the neuroprotective activity of G‐CSF on neurons in vitro. G‐CSF promoted locomotor recovery and demonstrated neuroprotective effects in an acute spinal cord injury model. The mechanism of G‐CSF's neuroprotection may be related in part to attenuating neuronal apoptosis by NPM1. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Discrete Choice Experiment to Estimate Breast Cancer Patients’ Preferences and Willingness to Pay for Prophylactic Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factors

ObjectivesRising out-of-pocket costs for cancer patients have increased shared decision making. Clinical guidelines recommend prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for patients receiving chemotherapy with a 20% or greater risk of febrile neutropenia. A discrete choice experiment was conducted to explore breast cancer patients’ preferences and willingness to pay (WTP) for prophylactic G-CSF to decrease the risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia.MethodsAn online discrete choice experiment questionnaire survey of a national US convenience sample of self-reported breast cancer patients with prior chemotherapy treatment was conducted. Sixteen paired G-CSF treatment scenarios, each with four attributes (risk of disruption to chemotherapy schedule due to low white blood cell counts, risk of developing an infection requiring hospitalization, frequency of administration, and total out-of-pocket cost) were presented with a follow-up “no treatment” option. Participant preferences and WTP out of pocket were estimated by logistic regression.ResultsParticipants (n = 296) preferred G-CSF regimens with lower out-of-pocket costs, lower risk of chemotherapy disruption, lower risk of infection, and greater convenience (one G-CSF injection per chemotherapy cycle). Participants’ WTP was $1076 out of pocket per cycle to reduce the risk (high to low) of disrupting their chemotherapy schedule, $884 per cycle to reduce the risk (24% [high] to 7% [low]) of infection, and $851 per cycle to decrease the number of G-CSF injections (11 to 1) per cycle.ConclusionsParticipants highly valued specific features of prophylactic G-CSF treatment including maintaining their chemotherapy schedule, lowering their risk of infection, and reducing the number of injections. Physicians should consider patient preferences to inform the best treatment choices for individual patients.