Synthetic lethality strategies: Beyond BRCA1/2 mutations in pancreatic cancer

Cancer cells are often characterized by abnormalities in DNA damage response including defects in cell cycle checkpoints and/or DNA repair. Synthetic lethality between DNA damage repair (DDR) pathways has provided a paradigm for cancer therapy by targeting DDR. The successful example is that cancer cells with BRCA1/2 mutations are sensitized to poly(adenosine diphosphate [ADP]‐ribose)polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. Beyond the narrow scope of defects in the BRCA pathway, “BRCAness” provides more opportunities for synthetic lethality strategy. In human pancreatic cancer, frequent mutations were found in cell cycle and DDR genes, including P16, P73, APC, MLH1, ATM, PALB2, and MGMT. Combined DDR inhibitors and chemotherapeutic agents are under preclinical or clinical trials. Promoter region methylation was found frequently in cell cycle and DDR genes. Epigenetics joins the Knudson's “hit” theory and “BRCAness.” Aberrant epigenetic changes in cell cycle or DDR regulators may serve as a new avenue for synthetic lethality strategy in pancreatic cancer.     

Current insights into the epigenetic mechanisms of skin cancer

Skin cancer is a manifestation of tumors. The different types of skin cancer are named according to their source of tumor cells. Currently, there are three main types of skin cancer. They are squamous cell carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma, and melanoma. Their epidemiological characteristics, clinical classifications, and treatment methods are somewhat different. The epigenetic modifications are also different in these three types of skin cancer. Epigenetics is the change in gene expression and function and the generation of a heritable phenotype without changing the DNA sequence. The phenomenon of epigenetics involves a variety of processes, including the methylation of DNA and RNA, histone modifications, RNAi, and chromatin remodeling. Researchers have found that DNA, RNA, histone, and chromatin level modifications cause heritable changes in gene expression patterns. This review will introduce the role of epigenetics in skin cancer from the three following angles: DNA methylation, histone modifications, and RNA methylation.     

DNA甲基化在肝脏再生中的研究现状与展望

目的总结目前DNA甲基化与肝脏再生关系的研究现状。方法检索国内外相关文献,对肝细胞甲基化水平、基因表达调控、甲基化相关蛋白与肝脏再生关系的研究进行综述。结果 DNA甲基化作为生物体内一种重要的表观遗传调控方式,近年来在肝脏再生中的作用越来越被重视。现有的研究已经发现,在肝脏再生过程中存在基因组低甲基化、相关增殖基因甲基化改变以及DNA甲基化转移酶、含植物同源结构域和环指结构域泛素样蛋白1调控肝脏再生等表观遗传现象。结论 DNA甲基化与肝脏再生之间存在着诸多的联系,从DNA甲基化水平调节肝脏再生有望在不久的将来成为现实。     

Histochemistry,Cytochemistry and Epigenetics

Over the past few decades, many researchers have individually identified tumor-related genes, and have accumulated information on their basic research in a database. With the development of technology that can comprehensively test the expression status within a short time, oncogene panel testing has become attainable. On the other hand, changes in gene expression that do not depend on changes in base sequences, that is, epigenetics, or more comprehensively, epigenomes, are also highly involved in the development and progression of disease. Oncogene panel tests tend to focus on DNA base mutations such as point mutations, deletions, duplications, and chimera formation. Elucidation leads to correct interpretation of diseases and treatment choices, and we are in an era where integrated understanding of the genome and epigenome is indispensable. In this review, we make every effort to cover a wide range of knowledge, including data on histone protein modification, non-coding (nc)RNA and DNA methylation, and recent application trials for demonstrating epigenetic alterations in histologic and cytologic specimens. We hope this review will help marshal the knowledge accumulated by researchers involved in genomic and epigenomic studies.     

Our genes are not our destiny: incorporating molecular medicine into clinical practice

In many developed nations, the state of publicly administered health care is increasingly precarious as a result of escalating numbers of chronically ill patients, inadequate medical personnel and hospital facilities, as well as sparse funding for ongoing upgrades to state-of-the-art diagnostic and therapeutic technology - an increased emphasis on aetiology-centred medicine should be considered in order to achieve improved health for patients and populations. Medical practice patterns which are designed to provide quick and effective amelioration of signs and symptoms are frequently not an enduring solution to many health afflictions and chronic disease states. Recent scientific discovery has rendered the drug-oriented algorithmic paradigm commonly found in contemporary evidence-based medicine to be a reductionist approach to clinical practice. Unfolding evidence appears to support a genetic predisposition model of health and illness rather than a fatalistic predestination construct - modifiable epigenetic and environmental factors have enormous potential to influence clinical outcomes. By understanding and applying fundamental clinical principles relating to the emerging fields of molecular medicine, nutrigenomics and human exposure assessment, doctors will be empowered to address causality of affliction when possible and achieve sustained reprieve for many suffering patients.     

Engineered human dicentric chromosomes show centromere plasticity

The centromere is essential for the faithful distribution of a cell's genetic material to subsequent generations. Despite intense scrutiny, the precise genetic and epigenetic basis for centromere function is still unknown. Here, we have used engineered dicentric human chromosomes to investigate mammalian centromere structure and function. We describe three classes of dicentric chromosomes isolated in different cell lines: functionally monocentric chromosomes, in which one of the two genetically identical centromeres is consistently inactivated; functionally dicentric chromosomes, in which both centromeres are consistently active; and dicentric chromosomes heterogeneous with respect to centromere activity. A study of serial single cell clones from heterogeneous cell lines revealed that while centromere activity is usually clonal, the centromere state (i.e. functionally monocentric or dicentric) in some lines can switch within a growing population of cells. Because pulsed field gel analysis indicated that the DNA at the centromeres of these chromosomes did not change detectably, this switching of the centromere state is most likely due to epigenetic changes. Inactivation of one of the two active centromeres in a functionally dicentric chromosome was observed in a percentage of cells after treatment with Trichostatin A, an inhibitor of histone deacetylation. This study provides evidence that the activity of human centromeres, while largely stable, can be subject to dynamic change, most likely due to epigenetic modification.