Uptake inhibitors do not change the effect of imidazoline α2-adrenoceptor agonists on transmitter release evoked by single pulse stimulation in mouse vas deferens

Summary The present study was undertaken to compare the presynaptic interaction of neuronal noradrenaline uptake inhibitors with imidazoline and phenylethylamine ₂adrenoceptor agonists under two different conditions: at low and high noradrenaline concentrations in the biophase.Isolated mouse vasa deferentia were stimulated with trains of 7 pulses given at 0.2 Hz and the inhibition by the ₂-adrenoceptor agonists clonidine, -methylnoradrenaline, and UK-14,304 of twitch responses was measured in the absence and in the presence of either cocaine (12 mol/l) or desipramine (40 nmol/l). The effects were determined for the first (equivalent to single pulse stimulation) and the last stimulus of each train. Both uptake inhibitors antagonized the presynaptic inhibitory effects of imidazolines (clonidine and UK-14,304) on the last twitch; the effects on the first twitch remained unchanged. In contrast, the uptake inhibitors potentiated the inhibitory effect of the phenylethylamine (-methylnoradrenaline) on both the first and the last twitches.These results support the view that the concentration of noradrenaline in the biophase plays a decisive role in the inhibition by a₂-adrenoceptor agonists of the electrically evoked release of noradrenaline. Agonists that are not substrates of neuronal uptake (i.e., clonidine, UK-14,304) become less effective when noradrenaline is present in the biophase while substrates of neuronal uptake (i. e., -methylnoradrenaline) do not. The results argue against the hypothesis that uptake inhibitors interact directly with presynaptic ₂-adrenoceptors or act at some link between uptake and receptor sites. Send offprint requests to S. Guimarães at the above address     

2-deoxy-D-glucose inhibits the antitumor effects of α-difluoromethylornithine on the growth of colon cancer in vivo

Summary The glycolytic inhibitor, 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2-DG), has been shown to inhibit the growth of certain cancers. -Difluoromethylornithine (DFMO) is an irreversible inhibitor of ornithine decarboxylase (ODC), the ratelimiting enzyme in polyamine biosynthesis. DFMO has been shown to inhibit cancer growth in a number of models. The present study was designed to investigate the effects of 2-DG alone and combined with DFMO on MC-26 mouse colon adenocarcinoma tumors growing in vivo. Twenty-eight male Balb/c mice were inoculated with 250,000 MC-26 cells, and then randomized into four groups of 7 each: group I served as control; group II received DFMO (3% in drinking water); group III received 2-DG (500 mg/kg/d IP); group IV received a combination of 2-DG and DFMO. Treatment began 5 days after tumor cell inoculation. MC-26 tumor area was reduced 73% by DFMO compared to a 24% reduction caused by 2-DG. The tumor weight was reduced 80% by DFMO and 52% by 2-DG. The tumor contents of DNA, RNA, and protein were significantly reduced by DFMO but not 2-DG. The tumor concentration of the polyamines putrescine and spermidine were reduced by DFMO alone or combined with 2-DG while spermine levels remained unchanged. 2-DG alone did not alter polyamine levels. These results indicate that both 2-DG and DFMO, when added as single agents, inhibit tumor growth. However, the addition of 2-DG to the DFMO regimen inhibited the antitumor effects of DFMO. Survival studies performed on MC-26 cells in vitro corroborated the antagonisms between DFMO and 2-DG that were shown in vivo.Dr. Upp was awarded a fellowship grant from the American Cancer Society Texas Division.     

A Comparison of the Cholinergic Activity of Selected H2-Antagonists and Sulfoxide Metabolites

Famotidine and selected H₂-antagonists were evaluated with respect to toxicity and selected pharmacological activities. When administered intraperitoneally to mice at a dose equivalent to 10 times their respective H₂-antagonist ED₅₀ values, no deaths were observed. Similarly, no alteration in brain ACh concentrations or overt pharmacological effects were noted. However, at 400 mg/kg, ranitidine produced 89% lethality, followed by cimetidine (11%) and famotidine. Only cimetidine and famotidine at this dose significantly elevated brain acetylcholine levels. These results do not correlate with the in vitro data, where ORF-17578 and ranitidine were the most potent entities with respect to acetylcholinesterase inhibition (1–2 × 10^–6 M), followed by nizatidine > cimetidine > famotidine. The sulfoxide metabolites of ranitidine and cimetidine were approximately one-tenth as potent as their parent compounds with respect to inhibition of acetylcholinesterase. Direct muscarinic stimulation or potentiation of acetylcholine-induced contraction in ileal tissue was not observed for any of the H₂-antagonists.     

2,4—D对甜橙幼果脱落及离区纤维素酶活性的抑制效应

暗柳橙(Citrus sinensis Osbeck)第一次生理落果期(3月下旬～4月中旬)的果实外植体脱落过程中,离区纤维素酶A、B的活性明显升高,第二次落果(4月下旬～5月中旬)期的果实脱落过程中,纤维素酶A的活性也显著提高,但纤维素酶B活性变化较小。细胞内、外纤维素酶的活性在外植体脱落过程中也不断升高。2,4—D能明显抑制胞内、外纤维素酶及纤维素酶A的活性,同时还能抑制外植体及非离休果实内乙烯的产生,但对纤维素酶B活性的影响无明显效应。田间喷布低浓度的2,4—D,明显地减少第一次生理落果,但对第二次落果的作用不如赤霉素。本文还讨论了果实的脱落、纤维素酶活性与乙烯之间的相互关系,及2,4—D的调控作用。并认为采用外植体的方法不失为研究脱落问题的有效手段。     

Distribution of 2-naphthol sulphotransferase and its endogenous substrate adenosine 3′-phosphate 5′-phosphosulphate in human tissues

The activity of sulphotransferase towards 2-naphthol and the concentration of its endogenous substrate, adenosine 3'-phosphate 5'-phosphosulphate (PAPS), have been measured in five specimens of human liver, lung, and kidney, and the mucosa from the ileum and the ascending, descending and sigmoid colon. The activity of 2-naphthol sulphotransferase (mean nmol.min-1.mg-1 protein) was 1.82 (liver); 0.034 (kidney); 0.19 (lung); 0.64 (ileum); 0.47 (ascending colon); 0.50 (descending colon); 0.40 (sigmoid colon). The concentration of PAPS (mean nmol.g-1 wet tissue) was 22.6 (liver); 4.8 (kidney); 4.3 (lung); 12.8 (ileum); 8.1 (ascending colon); 7.5 (descending colon); 6.2 (sigmoid colon). The concentration of PAPS and the activity of 2-naphthol sulphotransferase were higher in the liver than in the extrahepatic tissues. There was significant difference between ileum and ascending colon, both the activity of sulphotransferase and the concentration of PAPS being higher in the former. 2-Naphthol sulphotransferase activity and the concentration of PAPS have consistent distribution patterns. Differences between the tissues studied were more marked for sulphotransferase than for its endogenous substrate.     

Evidence for monoaminergic involvement in triadimefon-induced hyperactivity

Triadimefon is a triazole fungicide that produces hyperactivity in both mice and rats similar to that seen following administration of compounds with catecholaminergic activity (e.g., d-amphetamine). To determine whether the triadimefon-induced hyperactivity is due to an action on CNS catecholaminergic systems, we evaluated the effects of combined treatment of triadimefon with either the tyrosine hydroxlase inhibitor d,l--methyl-p-tyrosine methyl ester HCl (MPT) or the amine depletor reserpine. Adult male Long-Evans hooded rats, approximately 70 days of age were used. Dosage-effect functions were determined for MPT (0–200 mg/kg IP), reserpine (0–2.5 mg/kg IP), d-amphetamine (0–3 mg/kg IP), and methylphenidate (0–40 mg/kg IP). Motor activity was measured as photocell interruptions in figure-eight mazes. The interaction between triadimefon and MPT was determined with the following groups: 1) vehicle control; 2) 200 mg/kg triadimefon PO; 3) 100 mg/kg MPT; and 4) both MPT and triadimefon. A similar design was used to determine the interaction between triadimefon and reserpine (0.62 mg/kg), MPT and d-amphetamine (1.5 mg/kg), and reserpine and methylphenidate (5.0 mg/kg). In the first experiment MPT did not block the increased motor activity produced by triadimefon (i.e., both triadimefon alone and MPT in combination with triadimefon produced significant increases in motor activity). MPT did, however, block d-amphetamine-induced hyperactivity. Since MPT did not antagonize the effect of triadimefon, these data suggest that increased motor activity produced by triadimefon is not mediated through release of newly synthesized catecholamines. In contrast, pretreatment with reserpine blocked the hyperactivity induced by both triadimefon and methylphenidate, which suggests that triadimefon-induced hyperactivity may be due to an interaction with CNS catecholamines stored in reserpine-sensitive pools.The research described in this article has been reviewed by the Health Effects Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, and approved for publication. Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Agency nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. Presented in part at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Neuroscience, New Orleans, LA, November, 1987     

The effects of clonidine and yohimbine on human information processing

The effects of clonidine and yohimbine on human information processing were tested in six normal volunteers ages 18–30 years. Subjects were tested in a pre-post design with sessions conducted at weekly intervals. Three drug conditions were: Placebo (lactose), 0.2 mg clonidine, and 30 mg yohimbine. Two choice reaction time (RT) tasks were used. One was a stimulus evaluation-response selection task (SERS) that has been shown to be sensitive tod-amphetamine, methylphenidate and scopolamine. The other task was to assess stimulus pre-processing and used spatial frequency as a discriminative stimulus. The principle finding was that clonidine slowed RT; this effect was significant for both tasks. In contrast, yohimbine tended to speed RT, but the effects were significant only for the spatial frequency task on some analyses while not for others. RTs to high spatial frequency stimuli were speeded more than for low spatial frequency. The effects of these two NE drugs were compared with findings withd-amphetamine and scopolamine and interpreted within the framework of a serial information processing model proposed by Callaway (1983). Specifically, it is suggested that yohimbine and clonidine affect an early pre-processing stage.     

Effects of D2 dopamine receptor blockade with raclopride on intracranial self-stimulation and food-reinforced operant behaviour

To examine the involvement of D2 dopamine receptors in the neural mechanism of reinforcement, raclopride tartrate, a D2 specific dopamine antagonist with a relatively fast central action, was injected into 32 rats. The D2 antagonist reduced bar-pressing responses reinforced with electrical stimulation of the ventral tegmental area (ED₅₀=0.079 mol/kg) and those reinforced with food (ED₅₀=0.58 mol/kg) in 18–30 min after IP injection. The reduction in response rates could not be attributed to an interference with motor functions. An increase in the frequency of brain-stimulation pulses and a change in the schedule of food reinforcement, which respectively increased the baseline rate of responding, did not alter the effectiveness of raclopride. SCH 23390, a D1-specific dopamine antagonist, was sensitive to similar manipulation of reinforcement. These results seem to suggest that D1 and D2 antagonists may be acting at different locations in the neural mechanism underlying the reinforcement of operant behaviour.     

Drug Binding to α1-Acid Glycoprotein Studied by Circular Dichroism

The interactions of acidic and basic drugs with ₁-acid glycoprotein (₁-AGP) were investigated using circular dichroism (CD) measurements. Extrinsic Cotton effects were generated by the binding of drugs to ₁-AGP. The CD data suggested the presence of a single binding site on the ₁-AGP molecule. The induced ellipticities of the acidic drug–₁-AGP system decreased with increasing pH, while the ellipticities for the basic drugs increased with pH. The ellipticities for all drugs were reduced by the addition of fatty acids. Furthermore, the induced ellipticities decreased in the presence of cesium chloride for basic drugs bound to ₁-AGP. The extrinsic Cotton effects therefore appear to result from hydrophobic interaction with ₁-AGP for the acidic drugs and from hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions for the basic drugs.