eRFA: Excision Followed by RFA—a New Technique to Improve Local Control in Breast Cancer

Introduction Excision followed by RFA (eRFA) may allow improved cosmesis while ensuring negative margins in patients with breast cancer. This technique utilizes heat to create an additional tumor-free zone around the lumpectomy cavity. We hypothesized that eRFA will decrease the need for re-excision of inadequate margins.Methods Between July 2002 and January 2005, we conducted a multiphase trial of RFA of prophylactic mastectomy specimens and of women desiring lumpectomy. In both models, a lumpectomy was performed, the RFA probe was deployed 1 cm circumferentially into the walls of the lumpectomy cavity and maintained at 100°C for 15 min. Whole mount slides were used to measure the zone of ablation for ex vivo specimens. Hematoxylin and eosin staining of in vivo lumpectomy margins <3 mm was considered inadequate.Results Nineteen prophylactic mastectomy ablations revealed a consistent perimeter of ablation. Forty-one patients (mean age 63 ± 14 years) had an average tumor size of 1.6 ± 1.5 cm underwent in vivo eRFA, and 25% had inadequate margins: one focally positive, one <2 mm, eight <1 mm and one grossly positive. Only the grossly positive margin was re-excised. Overall complication rate of in vivo ablations was 7.5%. Twenty-four of 41 patients did not have post-eRFA XRT. No in-site local recurrences have occurred during a median follow-up of 24 months (12–45 months). Two patients have occurred elsewhere.Conclusions The ex vivo ablation model reliably created a 5–10 mm perimeter of ablation. In vivo, this zone reduced the need for re-excision for inadequate margins by 91% (10/11). Short-term follow-up suggests that eRFA could reduce re-excision surgery and local recurrence.     

Is the future magnetic? Magseed localisation for non palpable breast cancer. A multi-centre non randomised control study

IntroductionMagseed is an alternative method of localising non-palpable breast lesions that has addressed many of the limitations of wire guided localisation (WGL). It consists of a paramagnetic seed that can be visualised on mammography and ultrasound. Intraoperative localisation of the seed is achieved with the use of the Sentimag probe. The aim of this study was to prospectively compare localisation in patients undergoing wide local excision (WLE) for non-palpable lesions between Magseed and WGL.MethodsWe prospectively collected data on all patients undergoing image-guided WLE between October 2017 and September 2018 in two academic breast units with a planned accrual of 100 consecutive patients undergoing Magseed localisation. Data was also collected on a cohort of 100 consecutive patients undergoing WGL in the same time period.ResultsDemographic and disease characteristics were well balanced between the two groups. 4/104 patients were converted preoperatively from Magseed to WGL (2 misplaced Magseeds; 2 undetected Magseeds). Intraoperative identification and excision of the localised lesion was successful in all patients as confirmed with specimen radiography. Overall no significant differences were observed in the proportion of patients requiring re-excision between the two groups (Magseed 16% vs. WGL 14% p = 0.692). Specimens size by weight and volume was similar for both groups (Magseed 39.6 g vs. WGL 44.5 g p = 0.206 and 90.1 cm³ for Magseed vs. 95.6 cm³ for WGL p = 0.579).ConclusionsIn our series Magseed localisation proved to be as reliable and effective as WGL in terms of lesion identification, excision with tumour free margins and specimen weight.     

Management of positive margins after initial lumpectomy in elderly women with breast cancer

Introduction

It is unknown whether the treatment disparity observed between young and elderly women extends to the management of positive margins after initial lumpectomy. The primary aim was to evaluate the management of positive margins after initial lumpectomy in elderly women.

Is the systematic circumferential tumor cavity shaving a representative sample for the remaining mammary gland? About 75 cases

IntroductionThe conservative surgery is more and more indicated for breast cancer. However, we still fear local recurrence which is mostly due to residual tumors?. Several techniques have been used to minimize theses residual tumors; one of them is the systematic circumferential tumor cavity shaving (SCTCS).MethodsWe sampled 75 female patients who had conservative surgery with positive shaved margins in the anatomopathology examination and to whom a complementary treatment with mastectomy have been decided.ResultsThe median age was 48 years old. The median tumor size was 23 mm. In the histological examination of the tumors, 93% were invasive ductal carcinoma associated in 50% of the cases to the presence of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) where all the lumpectomies had clear margin. For the SCTCS, 62,2% were DCIS and in 17,6% of the cases were invasive ductal carcinoma. A complementary treatment with mastectomy was indicated to all the patients. A residual tumor was detected in the remaining mammary gland in 47,7% of the cases out of which 50% were DCIS. Local recurrence happened in three patients (4,6%) after a median of follow up of 36 months. The overall survival and the disease free survival at five years were respectively 83,6% and 75,5%.ConclusionStandardized lumpectomy cavity shaving provides a backup to lumpectomy margins in conservative breast surgery but it can also be used as a sample for the remaining breast, helping to detect the residual tumor, and decreasing the rates of local recurrence after BCT.     

Subtle Differences in Quality of Life After Breast Cancer Surgery

Background: Lumpectomy with axillary dissection (LAD) has taken its place alongside mastectomy (M) as the treatment of choice for stage I and II breast cancer. Its appeal is based on lessening disfigurement and thus improving quality of life.Methods: We used the SF-36 Health Survey modified with ten questions relevant to breast cancer surgery to evaluate whether quality of life with LAD was better than with mastectomy in women with stage I and II disease. The additional questions addressed satisfaction with intimate relationships and sexuality, and explored impact on the way women dress, use bathing suits, hug people, are comfortable with nudity, and rate their sexual drive and sexual responsiveness.Results: LAD was not associated with statistically significant better quality-of-life scores on any SF-36 questions, except vitality (P = .02). No differences were noted in the areas of intimacy and sexual satisfaction. LAD patients reported significant differences in matters of dress, use of bathing suits, hugging, comfort with nudity, and sexual drive compared to patients undergoing mastectomy.Conclusions: The SF-36 health survey detected few differences in quality of life measures between patients with LAD and those with mastectomy. However, LAD impacts favorably on the way women dress, on comfort with nudity, and on sexual drive.Presented in part at the Surgical Forum of the American College of Surgeons, 82nd Annual Clinical Congress, San Francisco, CA, October 9, 1996.     

Systematic cavity shaving: Modifications of breast cancer management and long-term local recurrence,a multicentre study

Background

The status of the surgical margins of lumpectomy is one of the most important determinants of local recurrence in breast cancer. Systematically practicing cavity margin resection is debated but may avoid surgical re-excision and allow the diagnosis of multifocality.

Methods

This multicentric retrospective study included 294 patients who underwent conservative management of breast cancer with 2–4 systematic cavity shavings. Clinico-biological characteristics of the patients were collected in order to establish whether surgical management was modified by systematic cavity shaving. Local recurrence rate with a long-term follow up of minimum 4 years was evaluated.

Results

Cavity shaving avoided the need for re-excision in 25% of cases and helped in the diagnosis of multifocality in 8% of cases. Resection volume was not associated with usefulness of the cavity shaving. No predictive factor of positive cavity shaving was found. The rate of local recurrence was 3.7% and appeared in a median time of 3 years and 8 month. Only one quarter of the patients with local recurrence had initially positive lumpectomy margins but negative cavity shaving.

Discussion

Systematic cavity shaving can change surgical management of conservative treatment. No specific target population for useful cavity shaving was found, such that we recommend utilising it systematically.     

Use of Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Women Diagnosed With Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia at Core Needle Biopsy Helps Select Women for Surgical Excision

Purpose

The study sought to investigate the role of breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients diagnosed with atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) at core needle biopsy (CNB).

Comparison of FDG-PET/CT and CT for delineation of lumpectomy cavity for partial breast irradiation

PURPOSE: The success of partial breast irradiation critically depends on proper target localization. We examined the use of fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET)/computed tomography (CT) for improved lumpectomy cavity (LC) delineation and treatment planning. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twelve breast cancer patients underwent FDG-PET/CT on a GE Discovery scanner with a median time from surgery to PET/CT of 49 days. The LC was contoured on the CT scan by a radiation oncologist and, together with a nuclear medicine physician, on the PET/CT scan. The volumes were calculated and compared in each patient. Treatment planning target volumes (PTVs) were calculated by expanding the margin 2 cm beyond the LC, maintaining a 5-mm margin from the skin and chest wall, and the treatment plans were evaluated. In addition, a study with a patient-like phantom was conducted to evaluate the effect that the window/level settings might have on contouring. RESULTS: The margin of the LC was well visualized on all FDG-PET images. The phantom results indicated that the difference between the known volume and the FDG-PET-delineated volume was <10%, regardless of the window/level settings. The PET/CT volumes were larger than the CT volumes in all cases (median volume ratio, 1.68; range, 1.24-2.45; p = 0.004). The PET/CT-based PTVs were also larger than the CT-based PTV (median volume ratio, 1.16; range, 1.08-1.64; p = 0.006). In 9 of 12 patients, a CT-based treatment plan did not provide adequate coverage of the PET/CT-based PTV (99% of the PTV received <95% of the prescribed dose), resulting in substantial cold spots in some plans. In these cases, treatment plans were generated which were specifically designed to cover the larger PET/CT-based PTV. Although these plans showed an increased dose to the normal tissues, the increases were modest: the non-target breast volume receiving > or =50 Gy, lung volume receiving > or =30 Gy, and heart volume receiving > or =5 Gy increased by 5.7%, 0.8%, and 0.2%, respectively. The normal tissue dose-volume objectives were still met with these plans. CONCLUSION: The results of our study have shown that FDG-PET/CT can be used to define the LC volume. The increased FDG uptake was likely a result of postoperative inflammation in the LC. The targets defined using PET/CT were significantly larger than those defined with CT alone. Our results have shown that treatment plans can be generated to cover these larger PET/CT target volumes with only a modest increase in irradiated tissue volume compared with CT-determined PTVs.