Oxygen desaturation during oesophageal manometry

Eighteen generally fit clinical patients were monitored with pulse oximetry. Mean oxygen saturation levels were lower (P<0.05) during oesophageal manometry (97.7-97.3%) than before it (98.3%). Fourteen out of seventeen (successful) traces had short 4-8% desaturation episodes, and in worst cases there were 8-9 episodes. It seems, therefore, that even patients with no predisposing factors than perhaps smoking and mild bronchial asthma are vulnerable to some oxygen desaturation in oesophageal manometry.     

Pressure-flow dynamics of the oral phase of swallowing

In 5 healthy volunteers, we studied the pressure-flow kinetics of the oral phase of swallowing. The regional profile within the oral cavity during swallowing was recorded, at the tongue tip (T₁), dorsum of the tongue (T₂), 3 cm from the tongue tip, oral floor, buccal cavity, and between the lips during swallows of water (0–20 ml) and 5 ml of mashed potato. Two strain gauge (SG) probes, each with two transducer recording sites 3 cm apart, were used for recording pressure. Supralingual and sublingual pressure were recorded concurrently. The relationship between transit of a barium bolus and deglutitive oral pressure phenomena was determined by concurrent videoradiography and manometry. Lingual pressure with the SG facing the tongue showed the most consistent recording and highest pressure: 193±16 (SE) mmHg at T₁ and 214±18 mmHg at T₂ for dry swallows. Pressures were similar for water swallows. However, mashed potato swallows produced a pressure of 383±30 mmHg at T₁ and 485±52 mmHg at T₂ that were greater than for water swallows (p<0.01). Pressure recorded with the transducers facing the hard palate and, to a lesser extent, laterally, was low and inconsistent. Oral-floor pressure was greatest with the transducers oriented upwards and averaged 64±2.9 mmHg proximally and 173±36 mmHg distally. At all sites the pressure waves propagated sequentially, toward the pharynx. Minimal pressure increases occurred in the buccal cavity. Lip squeeze varied from 0 to 90 mmHg. We can draw the following conclusions. The oral phase of swallowing includes contraction of the oral floor, which provides a platform for tongue movement. Oral pressure waves propagate toward the pharynx so that a swallowed bolus is propelled ahead of the point of lingual-palatal closure. Lingual peristalsis exhibits a wide range of pressures, with lower pressure for dry and liquid boluses than for a semisolid bolus. Buccal and lip contractions act as stabilizing forces, but do not contribute to bolus propulsion. Significant differences exist in the radial pressure profile of lingual peristalsis, with maximal pressure oriented toward the tongue.     

Effectiveness of anorectal biofeedback therapy for faecal incontinence: medium-term results

The medium-term effectiveness of biofeedback training for faecal incontinence was studied. Seventy-eight patients with minor incontinence underwent 4 supervised biofeedback sessions, and were followed for a minimum of 2 years. Results were correlated to aetiology, severity, anorectal physiological and endoanal ultrasound measurements. Four weeks following completion of the sessions, 59 patients (76%) improved significantly, 13 (17%) did improved slightly and 6 (8%) not change. At latest follow-up (mean, 26.3 months), only 10 (13%) had regressed, but they recovered after repeat biofeedback. Incontinence associated with previous colonic and rectal resection or perianal surgery responded significantly better to the training than patients with primary neurogenic incontinence (p=0.001). Patients with endoanal ultrasound sphincter defects also did better than those with primary neurogenic incontinence (p=0.02). In conclusion, biofeedback training is an efficient therapy in the majority of patients with minor faecal incontinence. Received: 19 January 2001 / Accepted in revised form: 15 May 2001     

Influence of everyday bolus consistencies in different body positions on high‐resolution esophageal pressure topography (HREPT) parameters

The standard protocol for esophageal manometry involves placing the patient in the supine position with head turned to left (supine head left [SHL]) while evaluating liquid bolus swallows. Routinely, semisolid or solid boluses are not evaluated. Currently, the daily American diet includes up to 40% solid or semisolid texture. Thus far, the data on the effect of different bolus on high‐resolution esophageal pressure topography (HREPT) parameters are scarce. This study aims to evaluate the effect of every day bolus consistencies in different body positions on HREPT variables. HREPT was performed on healthy volunteers with a modified protocol including liquid swallows in the SHL position followed by applesauce (semisolid), cracker (solid), and marshmallow (soft solid) in three different positions (SHL, sitting, and standing). A total of 38 healthy adult subjects (22 males and 16 females, median age = 27, and mean body mass index = 25) were evaluated. The resting upper esophageal sphincter pressure was significantly different while subjects swallowed crackers, applesauce, and marshmallows in most positions compared with liquid SHL (P < 0.05). The lower esophageal sphincter, contractile front velocity, and distal contractile integral pressures did not differ in all different consistencies compared with SHL. The integrated relaxation period was significantly higher with solid bolus compared with liquid bolus only in SHL position. The intrabolus pressure was significantly different with solid and soft solid boluses in all postures compared to liquid SHL. The American diet consistency affects upper esophageal sphincter pressure and partially integrated relaxation period and intrabolus pressure in various positions. Semisolid bolus swallows do not cause substantial pressure changes and are safe for evaluation and maintaining adequate caloric intake in patients with dysphagia who cannot tolerate solids.     

Greatly increased prevalence of esophageal dysmotility observed in persons with spinal cord injury

The effects of spinal cord injury (SCI) on esophageal motility are largely unknown. Furthermore, due to the complete or partial loss of sensory innervation to the upper gastrointestinal tract, a symptom‐based diagnosis of esophageal dysmotility is problematic in the SCI population. To determine the prevalence and characterize the type of motility disorders observed in persons with chronic SCI compared with that of able‐bodied (AB) controls based on esophageal pressure topography isometrics acquired by high‐resolution manometry and categorized by application of the Chicago Classification. High‐resolution manometry of the esophagus was performed in 39 individuals: 14 AB, 12 with paraplegia (level of injury between T4–T12) and 13 with tetraplegia (level of injury between C5–C7). A catheter containing multiple pressure sensors arranged at 360° was introduced into the esophagi of subjects at a distance that allowed visualization of both the upper esophageal sphincters (UES) and lower esophageal sphincters (LES). After a period to acquire pressures at baseline, subjects were asked to perform 10 wet swallows with 5‐mL boluses of isotonic saline while esophageal pressure and impedance were being recorded. No significant differences were noted for gender, age, or body mass index between AB and SCI groups. Twenty‐one of 25 (84%) subjects with SCI had at least one motility abnormality: 12% with Type II achalasia, 4% with Type III achalasia, 20% with esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction, 4% with the hypercontractile esophagus, and 48% with peristaltic abnormalities (weak peristalsis with small or large defects or frequent failed peristalsis). In contrast, only 7% (1 out of 14) of the AB subjects had any type of esophageal motility disorder. Despite the lack of subjective complaints and clinical awareness, esophageal dysmotility appears to be a highly prevalent condition in persons with SCI. The use of new and improved techniques, as well as a more stringent classification system, permitted the identification of the presence of nonspecific motility disorders in almost all SCI subjects, including four individuals who were previously undiagnosed with achalasia. Future work in persons with SCI is required to clarify the clinical impact of this observation and to study potential associations between esophageal dysmotility, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and pulmonary function. An increased awareness of esophageal dysfunction in the SCI population may lead to the development of new clinical guidelines for the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of these largely unrecognized disorders.     

Clinical,Endoscopic, and Radiologic Features of Three Subtypes of Achalasia,Classified Using High-Resolution Manometry

Background/Aims:

High-resolution manometry (HRM) has improved the accuracy of manometry in detecting achalasia and determining its subtypes. However, the correlation of achalasia subtypes with clinical, endoscopic, and radiologic findings has not been assessed. We aimed to evaluate and compare the clinical, endoscopic, and fluoroscopy findings associated with three subtypes of achalasia using HRM.

Patients and Methods:

The retrospective clinical data, HRM, endoscopy, and radiologic findings were obtained from the medical records of untreated achalasia patients.

Results:

From 2011 to 2013, 374 patients underwent HRM. Fifty-two patients (14%) were diagnosed with achalasia, but only 32 (8.5%) of these patients had not received treatment and were therefore included in this study. The endoscopy results were normal in 28% of the patients, and a barium swallow was inconclusive in 31% of the achalasia patients. Ten patients (31%) were classified as having type I achalasia, 17 (53%) were classified as type II, and 5 (16%) were classified as type III. Among the three subtypes, type I patients were on average the youngest and had the longest history of dysphagia, mildest chest pain, most significant weight loss, and most dilated esophagus with residual food. Chest pain was most common in type III patients, and frequently had normal fluoroscopic and endoscopic results.

Conclusion:

The clinical, radiologic, and endoscopic findings were not significantly different between patients with type I and type II untreated achalasia. Type III patients had the most severe symptoms and were the most difficult to diagnose based on varied clinical, radiologic, and endoscopic findings.