胺碘酮和索他洛尔在心律失常治疗中的疗效及安全性比较

目的 比较临床常用的Ⅲ类抗心律失常药物胺碘酮和索他洛尔在心律失常治疗中的疗效及安全性,为临床用药提供依据.方法 选取我院2011年1月至2012年1月诊治的92例心律失常患者为研究对象,采用随机数字表法将其分为2个研究组,每组46例.两组分别使用口服胺碘酮与索他洛尔进行治疗.对所有研究对象进行心电图监测,并分别于治疗3个月、6个月、9个月、12个月、15个月及18个月对两组研究对象的转复率、转复时间及不良发应发生率进行比较及统计学分析.结果 胺碘酮组的转复率略高于索他洛尔组,但差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）;胺碘酮组的转复时间长于索他洛尔组,且差异具有统计学意义（P＜0.05）;胺碘酮组的不良反应发生率为19.6％,低于索他洛尔组的28.3％,差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）.结论 相对于索他洛尔,胺碘酮在心律失常的治疗中具有疗效显著、安全性更高等优势,且适用范围广泛,具有重要的临床价值,适于推广使用.     

Effect of catheter ablation on progression of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

Ablation and Progression of Atrial Fibrillation. Objective: The objective was to determine the effect of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFA) on progression of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). Background: Progression to persistent AF may occur in up to 50% of patients with paroxysmal AF receiving pharmacological therapy. Hypertension, age, prior transient ischemic event, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and heart failure (HATCH score) have been identified as independent risk factors for progression of AF. Methods: RFA was performed in 504 patients (mean age: 58 ± 10 years) to eliminate paroxysmal AF. A repeat RFA procedure was performed in 193 patients (38%). Clinical variables predictive of outcome and their relation to progression of AF after RFA were assessed using multivariate analysis. Results: At a mean follow‐up of 27 ± 12 months after RFA, 434/504 patients (86%) were in sinus rhythm; 49/504 patients (9.5%) continued to have paroxysmal AF; and 14 (3%) were in atrial flutter. Among the 504 patients, 7 (1.5%) progressed to persistent AF. In patients with recurrent AF after RFA, paroxysmal AF progressed to persistent AF in 7/56 (13%, P < 0.001). The progression rate of AF was 0.6% per year after RFA (P < 0.001 compared to 9% per year reported in pharmacologically treated patients). Age >75 years, duration of AF >10 years and diabetes were independent predictors of progression to persistent AF. The HATCH score was not significantly different between patients with paroxysmal AF who did and did not progress to persistent AF (0.7 ± 0.8 vs 1.0 ± 0.5, P = 0.3). Conclusions: Compared to a historical control group of pharmacologically treated patients with paroxysmal AF, RFA appears to reduce the rate of progression of paroxysmal AF to persistent AF. Age, duration of AF, and diabetes are independent risk factors for progression to persistent AF after RFA. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 23, pp. 9‐14, January 2012)     

Serial electrophysiologic studies after single chamber atrial pacemaker implantation in patients with symptomatic sinus node dysfunction

After single chamber atrial pacemaker implantation, serial electrophysiologicstudies were performed noninvasively at intervals of 3 monthsover a total period of 3 years in 24 patients with symptomaticsinus node dysfunction. All patients underwent invasive electrophysiologicstudies before pacemaker implantation and demonstrated intactanterograde AV conduction. Patients were divided into 2 groupsgroup I did not require antiarrhythmic drugs during follow-upwhereas group 2 received antiarrhythmic drugs. In group 1(11 patients) the atrial paced heart rate producingAV Wenckebach phenomenon (AVWHR) remained stable during a meanfollow-up of 22±10 months, with a variability not exceeding10 beats min^–1 with respect to the initial AVWHR obtainedduring preoperative electrophysiologic study. In group 2 (13patients) with a mean follow-up of 15±8 months a meandecrease of AVWHR of 19.2±17.5 beats min^–1 waspresent between AVWHR before and 3 months after initiation oforal antiarrhythmic drugs (P<0.01) During chronic (>3months) antiarrhythmic drug therapy the variability of the AVWHRnever exceeded 10 beats min^–1 with respect to the AVWHRobtained 3 months after the initiation of oral drug therapy. Deterioration of anterograde AV conduction during long-termfollow-up of patients with symptomatic sinus node dysfunctionand intact anterograde AV conduction at the time of pacemakerimplantation is a consequence of orally taken antiarrhythmicdrugs, rather than a consequence of degeneration of the AV conductingsystem.     

Effectiveness of intravenous propafenone for conversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation: A placebo-controlled study

To evaluate the efficacy of propafenone in converting recent-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) lasting <7 days, 182 patients were treated intravenously with propafenone (Group 1, n = 98) and with placebo 0.9% saline solution (Group 2, n = 84) in a double blind study. The treatment was continued until sinus rhythm (SR) was restored, but for no more than 24 h. Eighty-nine patients treated with propafenone (90.8%) and 27 patients treated with placebo (32.1%) responded to the treatment and SR was restored (p < 0.0005). The mean time for SR restoration was 2.51± 2.77 h in Group 1, and 17.15± 7.8 h in Group 2 (p < 0.0005). In both groups the patients in whom SR was not restored (nonresponders) had larger left atrial size and longer duration of AF than responders at the onset of the arrhythmia. Nonresponders in Group 1 showed a decrease in mean ventricular rate (MVR) from 143± 16 to 101± 18 (p < 0.0005), while in the nonresponders in Group 2 no reduction of MVR was observed. Two patients whose SR was restored with propafenone had sinus standstill lasting 3.4 and 3.8 s, respectively. Propafenone used intravenously is an effective, quick, and safe drug for treating AF. Moreover, it significantly reduces MVR in nonresponders.     

Rhythm Versus Rate Control after Ablation and Pacing for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Clinical Implications of the PAF 2 Trial

Four recent randomized controlled studies that compared rhythm control versus rate control therapy demonstrated that rate control therapy is an acceptable alternative to rhythm control therapy. The control of heart rate achievable with pharmacologic therapy is imperfect and, in many patients, difficult to obtain. Ablation and pacing therapy offers better control of heart rate than drug therapy.The aim of the PAF 2 trial was to evaluate the effect of antiarrhythmic drug therapy on long-term maintenance of normal sinus rhythm after ablation and pacing therapy and to evaluate the effect of maintenance of normal sinus rhythm on major clinical events, quality of life and cardiac performance and, therefore, to evaluate whether antiarrhythmic drug strategy yields any additional benefit to ablation and pacing therapy. In this multicenter randomized controlled trial, 68 patients with severely symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation were assigned, after successful atrioventricular junction ablation and pacing treatment, to antiarrhythmic drug therapy with amiodarone, propafenone, flecainide or sotalol and were compared with 69 patients assigned, after successful AV junction ablation and pacing treatment, to no antiarrhythmic drug therapy. Although patients in the antiarrhythmic drug arm had a reduction in the risk of developing chronic atrial fibrillation, there was no clinical benefit beyond that obtained with ablation and pacing alone. On the contrary, antiarrhythmic therapy was associated with more serious adverse clinical events, i.e. episodes of heart failure and hospitalization. This suggests that the control of ventricular rhythm by ablation and pacing has a greater beneficial effect on short-term clinical outcome than the preservation of atrial contraction. Therefore, the results of PAF2 study are consistent with the drug trials comparing rhythm and rate control.     

Efficacy and safety of intravenous amiodarone in acute refractory arrhythmias

Few data are available on intravenous amiodarone therapy in refractory arrhythmias. This retrospective study in 50 patients (14 with supraventricular and 36 with ventricular tachyarrhythmias) revealed a favorable effect of intravenous amiodarone in the treatment of life-threatening arrhythmias with an overall success rate of 76%. In the subgroup of patients with ventricular fibrillation and concomitant severe congestive heart failure success rate was low (25%, 2/8), whereas effectiveness in patients with ventricular tachycardias was high (greater than 90%) and proved to be independent of left ventricular function. If patients with recurrent ventricular fibrillation were excluded from the analysis, successful treatment with intravenous amiodarone was achieved in 90%, even in those patients with severely compromised myocardium.     

心血管系统常用药物对新型冠状病毒肺炎感染风险及不良预后的影响

心血管疾病是新型冠状病毒肺炎(新冠肺炎)最为常见的合并症,在新冠肺炎大流行期间降压、降脂、抗血小板、抗凝、降糖及抗心律失常等心血管系统常用药物的安全性和有效性尚未形成统一明确的认识,相关指南也有待进一步完善。随着全球新冠肺炎病例数量的增加和第二波感染的发生,更好地了解这些药物对新冠肺炎患者的影响是当务之急。本文旨在总结心血管系统常用药物对新冠肺炎感染风险以及不良预后的关联,并对合并心血管疾病的新冠肺炎患者用药提出建议。