莫达非尼联合BiPAP呼吸机治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病合并睡眠呼吸暂停综合征的临床疗效

目的:评价莫达非尼联合双水平气道正压通气(BiPAP)在治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)合并睡眠呼吸暂停综合征(OSAS)的临床疗效。方法:选取在医院接受治疗的93例COPD合并OSAS患者,根据治疗方案的不同将其分为对照组(41例)和观察组(52例),对照组采用常规药物联合BiPAP治疗;观察组在对照组的基础上口服莫达非尼。记录两组正压通气时间及不良反应情况,比较两组治疗前后血氧分压(PaO₂)、血二氧化碳分压(PaCO₂)、用力肺活量(FVC)、第1秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)、FEV1与FVC的比值(FEV1/FVC)、呼吸暂停指数(AHI)、总睡眠时间、最低氧饱和度和Epworth睡眠量表(ESS)评分的改善情况。结果:对照组和观察组患者治疗后的AHI、总睡眠时间、最低氧饱和度及ESS评分均较治疗前有显著改善,差异有统计学意义(t_对照组=21.187,t=6.155,t=7.648,t=29.947;t_观察组=22.380,t=7.931,t=8.168,t=37.593;P<0.05),观察组患者总睡眠时间及ESS评分均显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t=2.315,t=14.232;P<0.05)。对照组和观察组患者治疗后1周和4周与治疗前相比,PaO₂有显著升高,Pa CO₂则有明显降低,差异有统计学意义(F对照组=29.947,F=36.147;F_观察组=27.533,F=34.580;P<0.05),而两组比较差异无统计学意义。对照组和观察组患者治疗后1周和4周的FVC、FEV1及FEV1/FVC通气指标均较治疗前有显著改善(F对照组=16.506,F=40.570,F=59.220;F_观察组=19.680,F=43.962,F=61.728;P<0.05),而两组比较差异无统计学意义。观察组和对照组不良反应发生率分别为19.2%(10/52)和7.3%(3/41),而两组比较差异无统计学意义。结论:对于COPD合并OSAS患者,呼吸机BiPAP模式可显著改善肺功能及肺通气相关指标,莫达非尼能提升睡眠质量,减轻白天的嗜睡症状,且未出现明显不良反应。     

应用综合干预措施提高临床微生物标本送检质量

 目的 应用综合干预措施,提高临床微生物标本送检质量。方法 调查2018年9月—2020年8月某院治疗性使用抗菌药物的住院患者,2019年9月开始实施综合干预措施。综合干预措施包括签订责任书、工作质量考核与反馈、知识培训、信息系统控制等,比较干预前（2018年9月—2019年8月）与干预后（2019年9月—2020年8月）住院患者抗菌药物治疗前微生物标本、无菌性标本、呼吸道标本及血培养标本送检情况。结果 共调查治疗性使用抗菌药物的住院患者40 335例,干预前21 441例,干预后18 894例。干预后抗菌药物、限制级抗菌药物、特殊级抗菌药物治疗前微生物标本送检率分别为65.20%、67.36%、99.02%,高于干预前的63.64%、64.68%、91.27%,差异均有统计学意义（均P<0.05）。无菌性标本送检率由干预前的13.81%提高至干预后的15.85%,呼吸道标本送检率由干预前的37.63%下降至干预后的35.68%,差异均有统计学意义（均P<0.001）。无菌性标本占比由干预前的30.43%提高至干预后的34.84%,呼吸道标本占比由干预前的45.74%下降至干预后的40.09%。两套及以上血培养标本占比由干预前的18.63%上升至干预后的21.95%,差异具有统计学意义（P<0.001）。结论 应用综合干预措施可同时提高临床微生物标本送检率与送检质量。     

早期股骨头缺血坏死介入治疗的探讨（附15例报告）

目的：探索早期股骨头缺血性坏死的介入治疗方法及效果。方法：采用seldinger穿刺方法超选择插管至患侧旋股内,外动脉,注入治疗药物（溶栓,扩血管,改善微循环等）。介入前后分别血管造影,以观察血管数及近期疗效。结果：介入治疗后患髋股头颈区血管数较治疗前增多（P＜0．001）,髋关节疼痛缓解,功能改善。结论：对早期股骨头缺血性坏死实施介入治疗,能够改善患髋的血液循环,减轻临床症状,改善关节功能,是一种微创安全有效的新方法,对远期疗效和治疗机理尚有待进一步观察和研究。     

普罗布考治疗高胆固醇血症的近期临床疗效观察

目的：评价普罗布考片（Probucol)应用于高胆固醇血症患者的有效性和安全性。方法：80例高胆固醇血症患者入选本研究（其中33例患者同时有高甘油三酯血症）,连续服用普罗布考片4周,每天2次,每次500mg,用药后4周测定血清总胆固醇（TC）,高密度脂蛋白（HDL－C）,甘油三酯（TG）及低密度脂蛋白（LDL－C）,结果：服用普罗布考片4周后,患者TC下降25．3％（P＜0．001）,LDL－C下降30．8％（P＜0．001）,HDL－C下降13．2％（P＜0．05）。伴有高甘油三酯血症患者的TG下降7．4％（P＞0．05）,在本研究中,除有2例患者因为腹泻而退出研究,没有发现其他严重的副作用,结论：普罗布考片可以安全,有效的降低高胆固醇患者的TC,LDL－C和HDL－C。     

雷尼替丁与复方丹参联合治疗急性胰腺炎35例疗效分析

目的：观察雷尼替丁与复方丹参联合治疗急性胰腺炎的疗效。方法：对确诊急性胰腺炎65例随机分成治疗组35例,对照组30例,分别用常规治疗,常规治疗加雷尼替丁与复方丹参静滴,连用4－7天,评价其疗效。结果：治疗组与对照组显效率分别为85.71%、43.3%,两组差异显著,P＜0.05。结论：两药联合应用不仅可减轻本病的炎症病变,且可改善心肌细胞营养状况。     

日本血吸虫成虫67kDa分子抗原的纯化及其对血吸虫病的诊断和疗效考核

目的 为检测日本血吸虫成虫67kDa分子抗原(SjAWA67)对血吸虫病的诊断及疗效考核价值。方法 通过SDS-PAGE和电渗方法,从日本血吸虫成虫抗原中分离纯化出67kDa分子抗原,并用该抗原包被酶标反应板微孔,进行ELISA检测。结果 SjAWA67的纯度已达到电泳纯和免疫纯,对急、慢性血吸虫病患血清的捡出率分别为100％和95％,与正常人血清、肝吸虫病和肺吸虫病患血清均未出现明显的交叉反应,44例血吸虫病患治疗后3、6和12个月后的阴转率分别达45．5％、75．0％和90,9％。结论 SjAWA67分子抗原具有较好的疗效考核价值和现场应用前景。     

日本血吸虫多价DNA疫苗pBK-Sj26(Sj32)-Sj23免疫效果的观察

为了观察血吸虫病多价DNA疫苗的保护力,将小鼠分成5组空白对照组、空质粒对照组、单价抗原DNA疫苗pBK-CMV-Sj23组、多价抗原DNA疫苗pBK-CMV-Sj26-Sj23和pBK-CMV-Sj32-Sj23组.大量提取各组质粒DNA后,各组于0、3、5周在BALB/c小鼠股四头肌注射相应质粒DNA,9周用血吸虫尾蚴攻击感染,15周剖杀小鼠计算减虫率及减卵率.结果显示与对照组比较,实验组小鼠减虫率及减卵率有极显著性差异(P<0.01);与单价pBK-CMV-Sj23组比较,多价DNA疫苗组的减虫率及减卵率有显著性差异.提示血吸虫多价DNA疫苗诱导小鼠对血吸虫的保护力优于单价DNA疫苗.     

A European consensus statement on the use of four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate for cardiac and non-cardiac surgical patients

Modern four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate was designed originally for rapid targeted replacement of the coagulation factors II, VII, IX and X. Dosing strategies for the approved indication of vitamin K antagonist-related bleeding vary greatly. They include INR and bodyweight-related protocols as well as fixed dose regimens. Particularly in the massively bleeding trauma and cardiac surgery patient, four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate is used increasingly for haemostatic resuscitation. Members of the Transfusion and Haemostasis Subcommittee of the European Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesiology performed a systematic literature review on four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate. The available evidence has been summarised for dosing, efficacy, drug safety and monitoring strategies in different scenarios. Whereas there is evidence for the efficacy of four-factor prothrombin concentrate for a variety of bleeding scenarios, convincing safety data are clearly missing. In the massively bleeding patient with coagulopathy, our group recommends the administration of an initial bolus of 25 IU.kg^-1. This applies for: the acute reversal of vitamin K antagonist therapy; haemostatic resuscitation, particularly in trauma; and the reversal of direct oral anticoagulants when no specific antidote is available. In patients with a high risk for thromboembolic complications, e.g. cardiac surgery, the administration of an initial half-dose bolus (12.5 IU.kg^-1) should be considered. A second bolus may be indicated if coagulopathy and microvascular bleeding persists and other reasons for bleeding are largely ruled out. Tissue-factor-activated, factor VII-dependent and heparin insensitive point-of-care tests may be used for peri-operative monitoring and guiding of prothrombin complex concentrate therapy.     

The use of intravenous lidocaine for postoperative pain and recovery: international consensus statement on efficacy and safety

Intravenous lidocaine is used widely for its effect on postoperative pain and recovery but it can be, and has been, fatal when used inappropriately and incorrectly. The risk-benefit ratio of i.v. lidocaine varies with type of surgery and with patient factors such as comorbidity (including pre-existing chronic pain). This consensus statement aims to address three questions. First, does i.v. lidocaine effectively reduce postoperative pain and facilitate recovery? Second, is i.v. lidocaine safe? Third, does the fact that i.v. lidocaine is not licensed for this indication affect its use? We suggest that i.v. lidocaine should be regarded as a ‘high-risk’ medicine. Individual anaesthetists may feel that, in selected patients, i.v. lidocaine may be beneficial as part of a multimodal peri-operative pain management strategy. This approach should be approved by hospital medication governance systems, and the individual clinical decision should be made with properly informed consent from the patient concerned. If i.v. lidocaine is used, we recommend an initial dose of no more than 1.5 mg.kg^-1, calculated using the patient’s ideal body weight and given as an infusion over 10 min. Thereafter, an infusion of no more than 1.5 mg.kg^-1.h^-1 for no longer than 24 h is recommended, subject to review and re-assessment. Intravenous lidocaine should not be used at the same time as, or within the period of action of, other local anaesthetic interventions. This includes not starting i.v. lidocaine within 4 h after any nerve block, and not performing any nerve block until 4 h after discontinuing an i.v. lidocaine infusion.     

中药配伍减毒增效的现代研究及思考

中药配伍是中医药临床应用的精华之一,合理配伍是保障中药临床用药有效性和安全性的重要措施。配伍后减毒增效机制的研究是诠释中药配伍合理性的关键内容。中药配伍机制研究正处于从体外到体内、成分到靶标、单一技术到多学科融合研究技术的转变历程,因此提出以“体外成分、体内过程、直接靶标”研究为基础,“中药配伍药理机制研究”为目的,从不同角度和不同层面探索中药配伍后作用机制的研究策略。