Uninterrupted anticoagulation with non‐vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: Lessons learned from randomized trials

Catheter ablation has been established as a rhythm control strategy in selected patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who have failed or wish to avoid anti‐arrhythmic drugs. Uninterrupted oral anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) peri‐ablation is associated with a lower risk of thromboembolic and bleeding complications as compared to interrupted oral anticoagulation and bridging heparin. However, a substantial portion of patients with AF are treated with non‐vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs). Herein, we perform an in‐depth review and comparison of three recent randomized trials of uninterrupted oral anticoagulation with NOACs vs VKAs in patients undergoing AF catheter ablation. Furthermore, we report pooled results of these randomized trials. The pooled incidence of major bleeding was significantly lower with NOACs as compared to VKAs (2% vs 4.9%, respectively; odds ratio [OR] 0.40; 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.16‐0.99). Similarly, cardiac tamponade was also reduced in the NOAC group (0.4% vs 1.5%; OR 0.27; 95% CI 0.07‐0.97). Thromboembolic complications were not significantly different between groups. Overall, these findings support the 2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement's class I recommendation for uninterrupted NOAC use in patients undergoing AF catheter ablation.     

Idarucizumab for Intravenous Thrombolysis and Endovascular Thrombectomy in Acute Stroke: A Case Report

BackgroundNon–vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs), such as dabigatran, are widely used to prevent ischemic stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Nonetheless, stroke occurs in 1–2% of patients, and the use of NOACs may increase the bleeding risk for patients who are receiving acute treatment of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) or endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). Idarucizumab, a monoclonal antibody developed to bind dabigatran, has been proven safe and effective for patients with uncontrolled bleeding or for patients planning to receive emergent procedures. It is now accepted that patients taking dabigatran with recurrent stroke may benefit from IVT after idarucizumab. However, there are limited data regarding idarucizumab use in patients planning to have EVT.Case ReportWe present the case of a male patient taking dabigatran who had a stroke and who was treated with idarucizumab followed by combined IVT and EVT. The patient had immediate recanalization of the occluded vessel and near total recovery of function after 3 months.Why Should an Emergency Physician be Aware of This?Our case report supports the evidence that patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) despite being under dabigatran therapy should be evaluated for reversal by idarucizumab which can contribute to the eligibility for IVT as well as EVT. It has also been proved to provide better outcomes for patients with AIS. The availabilities of specific reversal agents for NOACs will probably alter the current management of patients with AIS.     

Carboxylesterase-2 plays a critical role in dabigatran etexilate active metabolite formation

Dabigatran etexilate (DABE), an oral anticoagulant prodrug, is nearly completely metabolized to the dabigatran (DAB) active metabolite by carboxylesterase-1 (CES1) and carboxylesterase-2 (CES2). The high interpatient variation in DAB plasma concentrations, coupled with its low therapeutic index, emphasizes the need to understand how CES1 and CES2 impact active metabolite formation. Previous work focused on CES1 enzyme activity but the contributions of CES2 remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine how CES2 activity influences DAB active metabolite formation. We compared the efficiency of DAB formation from DABE when exposed sequentially to human intestinal and then human hepatic microsomes (mimicking the normal metabolic sequence) with the reverse metabolic sequence in which DABE is exposed to hepatic and then intestinal microsomes. The poor efficiency of DAB formation with reverse sequential hydrolysis indicates that CES2 activity is crucial for active metabolite formation. Thus, the decrease in DAB formation with normal sequential hydrolysis was more sensitive to CES2 inhibition by verapamil (CES2 IC50 = 3.4 μM) than CES1 inhibition by diltiazem (CES2 IC50 = 9.1 μM). These results show CES2 activity plays a crucial role in DAB formation and that variability in its activity is an important determinant of therapeutic response.     

In vitro and in vivo evaluation of drug–drug interaction between dabigatran and proton pump inhibitors

To quantify the drug–drug interactions between dabigatran etexilate (DE) and proton pump inhibitors (PPI) and in particular the role of P‐gp activity modulation. In the first part of the study, efflux ratios of DE were evaluated using the caco‐2 cell line in the presence of pantoprazole, omeprazole, rabeprazole, lansoprazole and ciclosporin A (positive control). The two PPI that reduced the efflux ratio of dabigatran to the greatest and least extent, respectively, were used during the second part of the study, comprising a single‐centre, randomised, open‐label study with an incomplete Latin square design. Nine healthy volunteers received DE (150 mg) alone, DE (150 mg) with the first PPI and DE (150 mg) with the second PPI in randomised sequence. Dabigatran plasma concentration and thrombin time were measured in blood samples withdrawn at 11 time points after each treatment. Models were built using a nonlinear mixed‐effect modelling approach. Omeprazole and rabeprazole were the two PPI that reduced the efflux ratio of DE least and most, respectively. The PK model was based on an inverse Gaussian absorption process with one compartment. The relationship between dabigatran concentration and thrombin time was considered linear. Some PK profiles had dramatically low concentration values due to poor absorption. These profiles were clustered using a between subject model mixture with interoccasion variability. The concomitant administration of PPI did not significantly change dabigatran pharmacokinetics. DE is subject to high absorption variability, precluding evaluation of the effect of PPI on its pharmacokinetics.     

Direct oral anticoagulants and cardiovascular prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation

Introduction: Patients with atrial fibrillation have an increased risk for stroke, systemic embolism and cardiovascular events, including myocardial infarction and cardiovascular death. However, the majority of studies that have analyzed the efficacy of anticoagulants have been focused only on their effects on the risk of stroke.

Areas covered: The available evidence about the association between atrial fibrillation and cardiovascular disease as well as the effects of oral anticoagulation on cardiovascular death and myocardial infarction, with a particular focus on direct oral anticoagulants, was updated in this review.

Expert opinion: The management of patients with atrial fibrillation should not be limited to the prevention of stroke, but should also include the prevention of cardiovascular events. Despite treatment with vitamin K antagonists, many patients with atrial fibrillation still develop cardiovascular complications, particularly individuals whose anticoagulation is difficult to control. Direct oral anticoagulants overcome the majority of limitations of vitamin K antagonists and compared with warfarin, they lead to a greater reduction in the risk of stroke or systemic embolism, all-cause mortality, and intracranial hemorrhage. Although these drugs can only be compared indirectly, it seems that not all direct oral anticoagulants are equal with regard to the prevention of myocardial infarction.