PET analysis of human dopamine receptor subtypes using 11C-SCH 23390 and 11C-raclopride

Tracer doses of ¹¹C-SCH 23390 and ¹¹C-raclopride, selective D1-dopamine and D2-dopamine receptor antagonists, respectively, were injected intravenously into three healthy male volunteers and two drug-treated schizophrenic patients. Regional radioactivity in brain and plasma was followed during 1 h by positron emission tomography (PET). After injection of both ligands a high accumulation of radioactivity was observed in the dopamine-rich caudate putamen. Experiments with ¹¹C-SCH 23390, but not ¹¹C-raclopride, showed a conspicuous accumulation of radioactivity also in the neocortex. None of the ligands accumulated in the dopamine-poor cerebellum. Specific binding of ¹¹C-raclopride in the putamen was reduced by more than 80% in schizophrenic patients treated with antipsychotic doses of sulpiride or cis(Z)-flupentixol decanoate. ¹¹C-SCH 23390 binding was slightly reduced in both the cortex and the putamen after treatment with cis(Z)-flupentixol decanoate but not after sulpiride. The results indicate that clinical antipsychotic drug treatment with sulpiride and cis(Z)-flupentixol decanoate causes a substantial blockade of D2-dopamine receptors in the basal ganglia but has only a minor effect on D1-dopamine receptors.     

Development of behavioral sensitization to the cocaine-like fungicide triadimefon is prevented by AMPA, NMDa, DA D1 but not DA D2 receptor antagonists.

Triadimefon (TDF) is a triazole fungicide that blocks the reuptake of dopamine (DA) and leads to increased locomotor activity levels in mice and rats, effects similar to those of indirect DA agonists such as cocaine. We recently found in mice that intermittent TDF administration led to robust locomotor sensitization, a phenomenon reflecting neuronal plasticity, following challenge with the same TDF dose after a 2-week withdrawal period. The current study sought to determine whether antagonists to DA D1-like receptors (SCH 23390; SCH), DA D2-like receptors (remoxipride; Rem), ionotropic glutamate n-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors (CPP), or ionotropic glutamate alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptors (NBQX) could prevent the development of TDF behavioral sensitization, therefore indicating their mechanistic involvement in TDF sensitization. Mice were treated with either vehicle, SCH (0.015 mg/kg), remoxipride (Rem, 0.3 mg/kg), CPP (2.5 mg/kg) or NBQX (10.0 mg/kg), followed 30 min later by vehicle or 75 mg/kg TDF (TDF), twice a week for 7 weeks, with locomotor activity measured post-dosing once a week. After a 2-week withdrawal period, mice were challenged with 75 mg/kg TDF or vehicle, to test for the presence of behavioral sensitization. Pretreatment with SCH, CPP, or NBQX, but not Rem, blocked the development of behavioral sensitization to TDF specifically for vertical activity. Antagonists that blocked TDF vertical sensitization also attenuated the increase in extracellular DA turnover (homovanillic acid [HVA]/DA) normally associated with this behavioral response. Therefore, DA D1, NMDA and AMPA receptors appear to be necessary for the development of behavioral sensitization to TDF. As such, TDF may be considered an environmental risk factor for behavioral dysfunctions linked to glutamatergic and dopaminergic systems.     

Co-activation of glutamate and dopamine receptors within the nucleus accumbens is required for spatial memory consolidation in mice

Rationale The nucleus accumbens receives glutamatergic and dopaminergic inputs converging onto common dendrites. Recent behavioral data demonstrated that intra-accumbens administrations of either glutamate or dopamine (DA) antagonist impair spatial memory consolidation. Thus, also based on the biochemical and molecular findings demonstrating interactions among the different receptors subtypes for glutamate and dopamine, it is conceivable that memory consolidation within this structure might be modulated by glutamate–dopamine receptor interactions.Objectives The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of intra-accumbens co-administrations of glutamate and DA antagonists on the consolidation of spatial information.Methods On day 1, CD1 male mice were placed in an open field containing five different objects and immediately after three sessions of habituation the animals were injected intra-accumbens with either vehicle or low doses of the N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA; AP-5 50 ng/side), the alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid (AMPA; DNQX 5 ng/side), the D1 (SCH23390 12.5 ng/side) and the D2 (sulpiride 25 ng/side) antagonists that were ineffective alone in disrupting object displacement. Separate groups were then focally injected with a combination of one of the glutamate antagonists with one of the dopamine antagonists. Twenty-four hours later, the ability of mice to discriminate object displacement was assessed.Results Controls and mice injected with ineffective doses of the NMDA, the AMPA, the D1 or the D2 antagonists were always able to react to the object displacement. On the contrary, the groups administered with the different combinations (AP-5 and SCH23390, AP-5 and sulpiride, DNQX and SCH23390, DNQX and sulpiride) of glutamate and dopamine antagonists did not discriminate the spatial change.Conclusions These results demonstrate that glutamate–dopamine receptor interactions within the accumbens are essential for the consolidation process of spatial information.     

Blockade or stimulation of D1 dopamine receptors attenuates cue reinstatement of extinguished cocaine-seeking behavior in rats

RATIONALE: D(1) dopamine receptor antagonists and agonists attenuate cocaine reinstatement of cocaine-seeking behavior (i.e., responding in the absence of cocaine reinforcement). OBJECTIVES: The present study investigated the effects of a D(1) antagonist (SCH-23390), partial agonist (SKF-38393), and full agonist (SKF-81297) on reinstatement of cocaine-seeking behavior elicited by presentation of cocaine-paired cues. METHODS: Rats that had been trained to self-administer cocaine with a light/tone stimulus complex paired with each infusion underwent extinction across days. After responding diminished, rats were given response-contingent access to the cocaine-paired stimulus complex. The effects of SCH-23390 (0-10.0 microg/kg), SKF-38393 (0-3.0 mg/kg), and SKF-81297 (0-3.0 mg/kg) on cue reinstatement of cocaine-seeking behavior were examined. The ability of the two D(1) agonists to independently reinstate cocaine-seeking behavior and the effects of SKF-81297 on cocaine reinstatement were also examined. To investigate the possibility of behavioral interference, the effects of SKF-38393 and SKF-81297 on grooming and stereotypy were assessed. RESULTS: SCH-23390 and SKF-81297, but not SKF-38393, attenuated cue reinstatement. However, while SKF-81297 dose-dependently increased response latency, SCH-23390 did not. SKF-81297 also independently reinstated responding at the two lowest doses tested while SKF-38393 had no effect. Furthermore, SKF-81297 decreased cocaine reinstatement and increased response latency only at the highest dose. Finally, stereotypy was observed at all doses of SKF-81297 that also decreased responding, although the patterns of changes in these behaviors did not completely correspond. CONCLUSIONS: While the antagonist and full agonist produced similar effects on cocaine-seeking behavior, only the agonist increased response latency, suggesting that different processes mediate the effects of these drugs.     

Role of D1-like receptors in amphetamine-induced behavioral sensitization: a study using D1A receptor knockout mice

RATIONALE: The role played by D(1)-like receptors in amphetamine-induced behavioral sensitization has been examined using both the D(1)-like receptor antagonist, SCH 23390, and the D(1A) receptor knockout mouse (i.e. D(1A)-deficient mice). Studies using these two approaches have provided conflicting evidence about the importance of D(1)-like receptors for amphetamine-induced behavioral sensitization. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to determine: (a) whether D(1A)-deficient mice exhibit amphetamine-induced locomotor sensitization after 3 and 17 drug abstinence days, and (b) whether SCH 23390, which binds to both D(1A) and D(1B) receptor subtypes, blocks development of amphetamine sensitization in wild-type and D(1A)-deficient mice. METHODS: In the first experiment, adult wild-type and D(1A)-deficient mice were injected with amphetamine (0, 1, 2, 4, or 8 mg/kg, IP) for 7 consecutive days. In the second experiment, wild-type and D(1A)-deficient mice were pretreated with SCH 23390 (0, 0.15, or 0.5 mg/kg, IP) 30 min prior to being injected with amphetamine (0 or 8 mg/kg, IP). After each daily amphetamine injection, mice were placed in activity chambers where distance traveled (i.e. horizontal locomotor activity) was measured for 60 min. On the test days, which occurred after 3 or 17 drug abstinence days, mice were injected with 1 mg/kg amphetamine and locomotion was measured for 120 min. RESULTS: Both wild-type and D(1A)-deficient mice exhibited amphetamine-induced locomotor sensitization. Pretreatment with 0.5 mg/kg SCH 23390 blocked the development of locomotor sensitization in wild-type mice, but did not alter the sensitized responding of D(1A)-deficient mice. CONCLUSIONS: It appears that D(1)-like receptors are necessary for the development of amphetamine sensitization in wild-type mice, while neither the D(1A) nor D(1B) receptor subtypes are necessary for the amphetamine-induced locomotor sensitization of D(1A)-deficient mice. A possible explanation for these conflicting results is that D(1A)-deficient mice may have a compensatory mechanism (not involving D(1B) receptors) that allows them to exhibit amphetamine-induced behavioral sensitization in the absence of the D(1A) receptor.     

Evidence for dopamine D(1) receptor involvement in the stimulus selection task: overshadowing in the rat

RATIONALE: A number of lines of evidence suggest that dopamine might play a role in stimulus selection, the process whereby specific cues are selected to guide action. OBJECTIVES: In order further to define the potential role for dopamine in stimulus selection, the present series of studies examined whether dopaminergic drugs modulate overshadowing, a paradigm that involves stimulus selection in rats. Overshadowing is where preferential learning occurs to one (usually the more salient) element of a stimulus compound. METHODS: Overshadowing was measured in rats using a thirst motivated conditioned emotional response paradigm (CER). Two simultaneously presented stimuli (light and tone) were paired with an aversive unconditioned stimulus (mild footshock); overshadowing is observed when learning to the less salient stimulus is weaker than learning to the same stimulus when it is conditioned alone. RESULTS: d-Amphetamine sulphate (1 mg/kg, IP) was found selectively to disrupt overshadowing, without affecting the CER in control animals. The dopamine (DA) D(2) receptor antagonists, haloperidol (0.2 mg/kg, IP) or raclopride (0.5 mg/kg, IP), failed to reverse amphetamine-induced disruption of overshadowing. In contrast, the selective DA D(1) antagonist SCH 23390 (0.05 mg/kg, IP) reversed amphetamine-induced disruption of overshadowing. The partial DA D(1) agonist SKF 38393 (5 mg/kg, IP) was found to abolish overshadowing when given alone. CONCLUSION: These data indicate a modulatory role for the DA D(1) receptor in the expression of stimulus selection and suggest that the DA D(1) receptor might play a role in salience allocation aspects of learning.     

Recent developments in reversing glycopeptide-resistant pathogens

Recent studies addressing vancomycin-resistance phenomena are surveyed. Besides leading semi-synthetic glycopeptides: BI-397 and LY 333328, other new synthetic derivatives are also presented. Rational design based on the known mode of action is seen in recent research from both industrial and academic groups. Thus, Biosearch Italia SpA worked on new synthetic glycopeptides with a modified binding pocket in order to find drugs active against both vancomycin-sensitive and -resistant strains. Eli Lilly & Co. and research groups at Stanford, Cambridge and Harvard synthesised covalently linked dimers in order to copy the dimerisation and membrane anchoring effects. Both directions proved to be rewarding and some interesting compounds with potent in vitro activity against vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) were found from these investigations. A new mechanistic proposal that can account for the bioactivity of LY 333328 against VRE was summarised. Research on new agents with modes of action different to that of glycopeptide antibiotics have also been successful and recent investigations related to RP-59500, SCH-27899 and U-100766 are presented.     

Differential effects of dopamine antagonists infused to the medial preoptic area on the sexual behavior of female rats primed with estrogen and progesterone

Dopamine (DA) in the medial preoptic area (mPOA) is important for the control of appetitive aspects of sexual behavior in the female rat. Recently, following infusions of DA agonists to the mPOA of females primed with estradiol benzoate (EB) alone, we found that the ratio of D1R/D2R activity within the mPOA determines the expression of appetitive behaviors (Graham and Pfaus, 2010). To further the knowledge of this mechanism, the present experiments examined the effects of intra-mPOA infusions of selective DA receptor antagonists. Ovariectomized, sexually-experienced rats primed with EB and progesterone (P) were implanted bilaterally with cannulae aimed at the mPOA and infused with 4 doses (0, 0.25, 1.0 and 4.0 μg) of the nonselective D1R/D2R antagonist flupenthixol (FLU), and selective D1R or D2R antagonists, SCH 23390 (SCH) or raclopride (RAC), respectively, in a randomized order prior to tests of sexual behavior in bilevel chambers. The high dose of FLU significantly decreased solicitations, hops and darts, and pacing behavior. The high dose of SCH also significantly decreased solicitations. In contrast, the high dose of RAC produced an increase in pacing, and a trend toward an increase in solicitations but no other effect on sexual behavior. These results reinforce the idea that the ratio of D1R/D2R activity within the mPOA of female rats is critical for the expression of appetitive behaviors, and further that this ratio is altered by P which shifts the DA effect to a predominantly facilitative D1R activation.     

Dopaminergic system in CA1 modulates MK-801 induced anxiolytic-like responses

Rationale

Today, there is relatively no debate on the notion that NMDA receptor antagonist agents in the hippocampus induce anxiolytic-like effects through distinct mechanisms. There is also a bulk of studies showing the involvement of the dopaminergic system in NMDA induced behaviors. Thus, on the basis of the involvement of dopaminergic system in anxiety-related behaviors, the present study aimed to investigate the involvement of the dorsal hippocampal (CA1) dopaminergic system in anxiolytic-like responses induced by MK801 (NMDA receptor antagonist) in male Wistar rats.

Methods

We used the elevated plus maze to test anxiety. This apparatus has widely been employed to test parameters of anxiety-related behaviors including the open arm time percentage (%OAT), open arm entries percentage (%OAE), locomotor activity, grooming (the rat rubs its face), rearing (the rat maintains an erect posture) and defecation (the number of boli defection).

Results

The data showed that, intra-CA1 injection of MK801 (2 μg/rat) increases %OAT and %OAE but not other exploratory behaviors, indicating an anxiolytic-like effect. Moreover, sole intra-CA1 injection of SCH23390, dopamine D1 receptor antagonist, (0.25, 0.5 and 1 μg/rat) and sulpiride, dopamine D2 receptor antagonist, (0.25, 0.5 and 0.75 μg/rat) did not alter anxiety-like behaviors. Co-administration of subthreshold doses of SCH23390 (0.5 μg/rat) and MK801 (0.5 g/rat), induced anxiolytic-like behaviors. Furthermore, intra-CA1 administration of different doses of sulpiride (0.12, 0.5 and 0.75 μg/rat), 5 min before the injection of an effective dose of MK801 (2 μg/rat), decreased %OAT and %OAE, however did not alter other exploratory behaviors induced by MK801.

Conclusion

Our results suggested a modulatory effect of the CA1 dopaminergic system on the anxiolytic-like effects induced by MK801.     

Evidence for regulation of body temperature in rats by dopamine D2 receptor and possible influence of D1 but not D3 and D4 receptors

The dopamine D₃ receptor agonist PD 128907 decreased body temperature in the rat. The selective dopamine D₃ and D₄ receptor antagonists, A-437203 and L-745,870, respectively, did not prevent this effect. In contrast, PD 128907-induced hypothermia was antagonized by SCH 23390, a selective D₁ receptor antagonist, and by L-741,626, a selective D₂ receptor antagonist. Moreover, the selective D₂ receptor agonist trihydroxy-N-n-propylnoraporphine (TNPA) elicited a robust hypothermia which was prevented by pretreatment with L-741,626 but not by A-437203. In agreement with previous data obtained in D₃ knock-out mice, present results suggest that D₂ rather than D₃ receptors mediate dopamine receptor agonist-induced hypothermia in rats. In addition, it appears that both D₁ and D₂ receptors may be involved in a cooperative manner.