The differential behavioural effects of benzazepine D1 dopamine agonists with varying efficacies,co-administered with quinpirole in primate and rodent models of Parkinson's disease

The effects of co-administration of quinpirole with benzazepine D₁ dopamine (DA) agonists possessing full/supramaximal (SKF 80723 and SKF 82958), partial (SKF 38393 and SKF 75670) and no efficacies (SKF 83959) in stimulating adenylate cyclase (AC) were investigated in rodent and primate models of Parkinson's disease (PD). In rats with a unilateral 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) lesion of the medial forebrain bundle, co-administration of SKF 38393 (7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine), SKF 75670 (3-CH₃ analogue), SKF 80723 (6-Br analogue), SKF 83959 (6-Cl, 3-CH₃, 3-CH₃ analogue) and SKF 82958 (6-Cl, 3-C₃H₅ analogue) strongly potentiated the contralateral circling induced by quinpirole. In MPTP (1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine) treated common marmosets, administration of quinpirole alone increased locomotor activity and reversed motor deficits. Grooming and oral activity were unaltered. Co-administration of SKF 38393 and SKF 75670 inhibited the quinpirole-induced changes in locomotor activity and motor disability. The combined treatment of SKF 80723 or SKF 82958 with quinpirole had no overall effect on locomotor activity or motor disability. In contrast, SKF 83959 extended the duration of the quinpirole-induced increase in locomotor activity with corresponding decreases in motor disability. Co-administration of high doses of SKF 82958 and more especially SKF 83959 and SKF 80723, with quinpirole induced hyperexcitability and seizures. Oral activity and grooming were unaltered following the co-administration of benzazepine derivatives with quinpirole. The ability of some benzazepine D₁ DA agonists to prolong the antiparkinsonian effects of quinpirole in the MPTP-treated marmoset may indicate a role for certain D₁ DA agonists in the clinical treatment of PD. In general, the behavioural responses to the combined administration of benzazepines with quinpirole in the 6-OHDA lesioned rat and more especially the MPTP-treated marmoset failed to correlate with their ability to stimulate AC. These observations further implicate a behavioural role for D₁ DA receptors not linked to AC.     

The MCH1 receptor antagonist SNAP 94847 induces sensitivity to dopamine D2/D3 receptor agonists in rats and mice

Antidepressant treatment of two or more weeks in rats has been shown to enhance the locomotor-stimulating effects of dopamine D₂/D₃ receptor agonists. This action has been attributed to an increased sensitivity of postsynaptic dopamine receptors in the nucleus accumbens, thought to represent an essential mechanism by which antidepressants act therapeutically to enhance reward and motivation. We tested whether the melanin-concentrating hormone receptor₁ (MCH₁) antagonist SNAP 94847, reported to have antidepressant-like activity in several preclinical behavioral models, mimics this key feature of established antidepressants. Locomotor responses to the dopamine D₂/D₃ agonist quinpirole following acute or chronic administration of fluoxetine (18 mg/kg/day) or SNAP 94847 (20 mg/kg/day) were assessed in habituated Sprague-Dawley rats, as well as BALB/c and CD-1 mice. Rats showed a significant increase in quinpirole-induced locomotor activity following chronic (2 weeks), but not acute (1 h) fluoxetine or SNAP 94847 administration. BALB/c mice treated for 21 days with fluoxetine or SNAP 94847 showed marked increases in quinpirole-induced locomotor activity, with the onset of hyper-locomotion appearing earlier in the time course after SNAP 94847 compared to fluoxetine. Administration of either compound for 7 days was also sufficient to augment the quinpirole response in BALB/c mice. Fluoxetine and SNAP 94847 (21 days) failed to modify quinpirole responses in CD-1 mice, and the compounds were ineffective after acute administration in both mouse strains. This report demonstrates in two rodent species that chronic treatment with an MCH₁ receptor antagonist, as with clinically proven antidepressants, produces sensitization to the locomotor effects of dopamine D₂/D₃ agonists.     

Sensitization of amphetamine-induced stereotyped behaviors during the acute response: role of D1 and D2 dopamine receptors

During the response to an injection of amphetamine, rapid changes occur in the ability of the drug to induce stereotyped behaviors. This enhanced responsivity does not involve changes in the caudate–putamen or nucleus accumbens extracellular dopamine response, but appears to require activation of dopamine receptors. In the present studies we examined the role that D₁ and D₂ dopamine receptors might play in the development and expression of the enhanced stereotypy response. In one series of experiments we used the dopamine agonists, SKF 82958 and quinpirole as relatively selective probes at D₁ and D₂ dopamine receptors, respectively, to test for changes in dopamine receptor sensitivity following a pretreatment (‘priming') with 4.0 mg/kg amphetamine. Doses of both SKF 82958 and quinpirole which were sub-threshold to induce perseverative behaviors in control animals, promoted stereotyped behaviors in amphetamine-primed animals, suggesting an enhanced sensitivity of both D₁ and D₂ receptors. In a second series of experiments, we sought to determine whether priming with these relatively selective dopamine receptor agonists, as well as the mixed D₁/D₂ agonist, apomorphine, would result in an enhanced stereotypy response to the subsequent administration of non-stereotypy producing doses of amphetamine (0.5–1.5 mg/kg). Priming with the dopamine receptor agonists each resulted in an enhanced amphetamine-induced stereotypy response. These results indicate that both D₁ and D₂ dopamine receptors contribute to both the development and the expression of the altered stereotypy responsivity, though several dose- and time-related observations suggest that other mechanisms likely contribute as well. Because these changes are apparent during the amphetamine response, they may have important implications for the evolving behavioral alterations which result when stimulants are administered in a binge pattern of drug abuse.     

Effects of daily SKF 38393, quinpirole,and SCH 23390 treatments on locomotor activity and subsequent sensitivity to apomorphine

In three experiments, male Wistar rats (250–350 g) were injected (SC) daily with the D₁-type dopamine receptor agonist, SKF 38393 (0.0, 4.0, 8.0, or 16.0 mg/kg), the D₂-type dopamine receptor agonist, quinpirole (0.0, 0.3, or 3.0 mg/kg), and/or the D₁-type dopamine receptor antagonist, SCH 23390 (0.0 or 0.5 mg/kg) for 8–10 days. After each daily injection, the rats were tested for locomotor activity in photocell arenas for 20 min. Following this subchronic pretreatment, all rats were challenged with the mixed dopamine receptor agonist apomorphine (1.0 mg/kg, SC) and tested for locomotor activity. SKF 38393 treatments produced a dose-dependent decrease in locomotor activity which did not significantly change across days. Quinpirole also depressed locomotor activity when first injected, but this quinpirole-induced inhibition of activity progressively decreased across days. When subsequently challenged with apomorphine, rats in both the SKF 38393 and the quinpirole pretreatment groups displayed greater locomotor activity than rats pretreated with only vehicle. Although SCH 23390 pretreatments did not affect subsequent sensitivity to apomorphine, SCH 23390 completely blocked the effect of quinpirole. These results suggest that although repeated D₁ receptor stimulation may be sufficient to induce behavioral sensitization to apomorphine, D₂ receptor stimulation also contributes to the effect.Portions of this paper were presented at the 1991 Society for Neuroscience meetings, New Orleans, La, USA.     

Effect of quinpirole on timing behaviour in the free-operant psychophysical procedure: evidence for the involvement of D<Subscript>2</Subscript> dopamine receptors

RATIONALE: Operant timing behaviour is sensitive to dopaminergic manipulations. It has been proposed that this effect is mediated principally by D(2)-like dopamine receptors. However, we recently found that the effect of d-amphetamine on timing in the free-operant psychophysical procedure was mediated by D(1)-like dopamine receptors. It has not been established whether stimulation of D(2)-like receptors affects timing in this schedule. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of a D(2)-like receptor agonist quinpirole on second-range timing and the ability of dopamine receptor antagonists to reverse quinpirole's effects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Rats responded on two levers (A and B) under a free-operant psychophysical schedule in which reinforcement was provided intermittently for responding on A during the first half, and B during the second half, of 50-s trials. Logistic functions were fitted to the relative response rates [percent responding on B (%B) vs time (t)] under each treatment; quantitative timing indices [T (50) (value of t when %B = 50) and Weber fraction] were compared among treatments. RESULTS: Quinpirole (0.04, 0.08 mg kg(-1)) reduced T (50). This effect was attenuated by D(2)-like receptor antagonists haloperidol (0.05, 0.1 mg kg(-1)), eticlopride (0.04, 0.08 mg kg(-1)) and sulpiride (30, 60 mg kg(-1)), but not by the D(3) receptor-preferring antagonist nafadotride (0.5, 1 mg kg(-1)), the D(4) receptor antagonist L-745870 (1, 3 mg kg(-1)) or the D(1)-like receptor antagonist SKF-83566 (0.015 mg kg(-1)). CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that quinpirole reduced T (50) via an action at D(2) receptors. D(1)-like and D(2)-like receptors may mediate behaviourally similar but pharmacologically distinct effects on timing behaviour.     

Neonatal exposure to epidermal growth factor induces dopamine D<Subscript>2</Subscript>-like receptor supersensitivity in adult sensorimotor gating

Rational Abnormality in the neurotrophic factor for dopamine neurons, epidermal growth factor (EGF), is associated with schizophrenia. Thus, rats treated with EGF as neonates are used as a putative animal model for schizophrenia showing impaired prepulse inhibition (PPI) and other cognitive deficits in the adult stage. Objectives To elucidate the abnormal behavioral traits of this animal model, the EGF effects on the dopaminergic system were analyzed pharmacologically and biochemically at the adult stage. Results We examined the effects of subthreshold doses of dopamine agonists on PPI in this model. A non-selective dopamine agonist, apomorphine (0.1 mg/kg), decreased PPI in EGF-treated rats, but not in controls. Further, a D₂-like receptor agonist, quinpirole (0.01 and 0.03 mg/kg), similarly decreased PPI in EGF-treated rats but had no effect in the control animals. In contrast, a D₁-like receptor agonist, SKF38393 (3 and 10 mg/kg), had no effect on PPI in both groups. To explore the molecular mechanism underlying the change in sensorimotor gating, we assessed D₁ and D₂ receptors expression in the prefrontal cortex, striatum and hippocampus and their downstream signaling. Although there were no significant differences in basal receptor levels, quinpirole administration significantly enhanced phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and cAMP response element binding protein (CREB) in the striatum of EGF-treated rats. Conclusion These results suggest that circulating EGF in the early development substantially influences D₂ receptor-dependent regulation of sensorimotor gating.     

Fluoxetine does not alter the ability of dopamine D1- and D2-like agonists to substitute for cocaine in squirrel monkeys

Fluoxetine has been shown to enhance several behavioral effects of cocaine, including its discriminative-stimulus effects. An interaction between increased serotonergic and dopaminergic actions produced by blockade of serotonin and dopamine reuptake, is one possible mechanism for the enhancement. The present study investigated the effects of fluoxetine on the cocaine-like discriminative-stimulus effects of the D₂-like agonists quinpirole and (−)-NPA, and the D₁-like agonist SKF 82958 in squirrel monkeys trained to discriminate cocaine. The direct dopaminergic agonists, injected 5 min before testing, produced maximal levels of cocaine-appropriate responding of 50% (0.3 mg/kg, SKF 82958), 67% (0.003 mg/kg, (−)-NPA), and 77% (0.1 mg/kg, quinpirole) with ED₅₀ values of 0.43, 0.003, and 0.06 mg/kg, respectively. Fluoxetine at doses up to 10 mg/kg (also 5 min before testing) did not alter the effectiveness or the potency of any of the dopamine agonists in substituting for cocaine. The present failure of fluoxetine to alter the cocaine-like discriminative effects of the dopamine agonists is consistent with the notion that the mechanism underlying the enhancement of the effects of cocaine by fluoxetine is not simply an interaction between enhanced serotonergic and dopaminergic activation as it is not obtained with direct-acting dopamine receptor agonists.     

D1 priming enhances both D1- and D2-mediated rotational behavior and striatal Fos expression in 6-hydroxydopamine lesioned rats

Rats with unilateral 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) lesions exhibit behavioral sensitization upon repeated treatment with dopamine agonists, a phenomenon called ‘priming’. We examined the effectiveness of priming with D1 or D2 agonists on rotational behavior and striatal Fos expression following challenge with D1 or D2 agonists. Twenty-one days post-lesion, rats received three priming injections, spaced 3-6 days apart, with water, D1 agonist SKF38393 (10 mg/kg) or D2 agonist quinpirole (1 mg/kg). One week later, 6-OHDA rats were challenged with water, SKF38393 (1 or 10 mg/kg) or quinpirole (0.25 mg/kg). 6-OHDA rats challenged with SKF38393 (1 mg/kg) showed no contralateral rotational behavior, but robust striatal Fos expression in D1-primed animals. Challenge with SKF38393 (10 mg/kg) led to pronounced contralateral rotational behavior and striatal Fos expression in all priming groups — with the largest behavioral response in D1- and D2-primed rats. Quinpirole challenge (0.25 mg/kg) led to robust contralateral rotational behavior and striatal Fos expression in D1-primed animals, but only mild rotational behavior and baseline levels of striatal Fos expression in D2-primed animals. These data suggest that D1- or D2-priming enhances rotational behavior following challenge with D1 or D2 agonist, but only D1-priming enhances D1- and D2-mediated striatal Fos expression in 6-OHDA rats.     

Obsessive-compulsive disorder: Insights from animal models

Research with animal models of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) shows the following: (1) Optogenetic studies in mice provide evidence for a plausible cause-effect relation between increased activity in cortico-basal ganglia-thalamo-cortical (CBGTC) circuits and OCD by demonstrating the induction of compulsive behavior with the experimental manipulation of the CBGTC circuit. (2) Parallel use of several animal models is a fruitful paradigm to examine the mechanisms of treatment effects of deep brain stimulation in distinct OCD endophenotypes. (3) Features of spontaneous behavior in deer mice constitute a rich platform to investigate the neurobiology of OCD, social ramifications of a compulsive phenotype, and test novel drugs. (4) Studies in animal models for psychiatric disorders comorbid with OCD suggest comorbidity may involve shared neural circuits controlling expression of compulsive behavior. (5) Analysis of compulsive behavior into its constitutive components provides evidence from an animal model for a motivational perspective on OCD. (6) Methods of behavioral analysis in an animal model translate to dissection of compulsive rituals in OCD patients, leading to diagnostic tests.     

D1 dopamine receptor stimulation enables the postsynaptic, but not autoreceptor, effects of D2 dopamine agonists in nigrostriatal and mesoaccumbens dopamine systems

Possible functional interactions between D1 and D2 dopamine (DA) receptors were examined using extracellular single-cell recording with microiontophoretic application of selective D1 and D2 receptor agonists both postsynaptically, in the rat nucleus accumbens (NAc) and caudate-putamen (CPu), and presynaptically, at impulse-regulating somatodendritic DA autoreceptors in the ventral tegmental area (A10) and substantia nigra pars compacta (A9). In addition, synthesis-modulating nerve terminal DA autoreceptors were studied in both the CPu and NAc using the gamma-butyrolactone (GBL) neurochemical model of isolated nerve terminal autoreceptor function in vivo. In both the NAc and CPu, the inhibition of neurons produced by iontophoresis of the D2 receptor agonists quinpirole or RU-24213 was attenuated by acute DA depletion via the tyrosine hydroxylase inhibitor alpha-methyl-p-tyrosine (AMPT). However, during iontophoresis of the selective D1 DA receptor agonist SKF 38393, the inhibitory effects of the D2 agonists were again evident, suggesting that the attenuation of D2 agonist-induced inhibition was due to decreased D1 receptor activation. In contrast, the inhibitory effects produced by the non-selective D1/D2 agonist apomorphine or by SKF 38393 were unaffected by AMPT pretreatment. Thus, D1 receptor activation appears necessary for D2 receptor-mediated inhibition of NAc and CPu neurons, whereas D2 receptor activation is not required for the inhibition produced by D1 receptor stimulation. In contrast to postsynaptic D2 receptors, the ability of DA agonists to stimulate D2 DA autoreceptors was not altered by manipulations of D1 receptor occupation. Enhancing D1 receptor stimulation with SKF 38393 or reducing D1 receptor occupation with either the selective D1 receptor antagonist SCH 23390 or AMPT failed to alter the rate-inhibitory effect of i.v. quinpirole on A9 or A10 DA neurons. Similarly, iontophoresis of SKF 38393 failed to alter the inhibitory effects of iontophoretic quinpirole. SKF 38393 also failed to affect the inhibition of GBL-induced increases in DOPA accumulation (tyrosine hydroxylase activity) produced by quinpirole in either the NAc or CPu. Furthermore, reversal of GBL-induced increases in DOPA accumulation by apomorphine or quinpirole was unaffected by pretreatment with SCH 23390. Therefore, D1 receptor occupation appears to be necessary for the expression of the functional effects of postsynaptic D2 receptor stimulation but not presynaptic D2 DA autoreceptor stimulation.