Does obesity put your brain at risk?

Background and aimsThe negative impact of obesity on the brain is an issue of increasing clinical interest. Hence, this review summarized evidence linking obesity with brain morphology (gray and white matter volume), brain function (functional activation and connectivity), and cognitive function.MethodsA criticals review of the relevant published English articles between 2008 and 2022, using PubMed, Google Scholar and Science Direct. Studies were included if (1) an experimental/intervention study was conducted (2) the experiment/intervention included both high fat diet or body weight, whether it could counteract the negative effect brain morphological or functional change. Critical analysis for a supporting study was also carried out.ResultsBrain dysfunction can be recognized as result from neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, change in gut-brain hormonal functionality decrease regional blood flow or diminished hippocampal size and change in gut-brain hormonal functionality; which collectively translate into a cycle of deranged metabolic control and cognitive deficits, often obesity referred as changes in brain biochemistry and brain function. Recently, a few changes in brain structure and functions could be traced back even to obese children or adult. Evidence here suggested that obesity elicits early neuroinflammation effects, which likely disrupt the normal metabolism in hypothalamus, and hippocampus result from brain insulin resistance. The mechanisms of these robust effects are discussed herein.ConclusionBrain disease is inseparable from obesity itself and requires a better recognition to allow future therapeutic targeting for treatment of obesity. Additional research is needed to identify the best treatment targets and to identify if these changes reversible.     

Can I Ski Doc?: Return to Skiing Following Total Joint Arthroplasty

BackgroundCurrently, there are little data on performance, safety, or return to downhill skiing after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). This leaves surgeons with little information for patient counseling regarding skiing.MethodsAn online survey was sent to 4360 patients who had undergone at least 1 primary TJA at a single academic center over the past 10 years (4 surgeons). The survey asked patients about their prior and current skiing activity including ability level, limitations, and reoperations. Demographics, patient-reported outcomes, and reoperations were also captured through chart review. Chi-squared, analysis of variance, and t-tests were used to compare demographics and outcomes. Paired t-tests were used to compare preoperative and postoperative skiing levels.ResultsOf the 763 survey respondents, the average follow-up was 4.4 years (range 0.5-10.3). In total, 35.6% had never skied, 26.5% had not skied in the 5 years prior to surgery (remote), and 37.9% had skied in the 5 years prior to surgery (recent). Seventy percent of recent skiers returned to skiing after surgery, compared to 11.9% of remote skiers. The majority of skiers, mostly advanced, returned to their prior level. There was no difference in return rates in those with a single total hip arthroplasty vs total knee arthroplasty vs multiple TJAs. Rates of reoperation were not significantly different between patients who did and did not return to skiing.ConclusionThe majority of recent skiers were able to return to skiing after TJA at their same level without an increase in reoperation rate. Further studies are needed to determine long-term consequences of skiing after TJA.     

Midterm Outcomes of the Dissected Aorta Repair Through Stent Implantation Trial

1. Download : Download high-res image (134KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image