Cannabinoid receptor and N-acyl phosphatidylethanolamine phospholipase D--evidence for altered expression in multiple sclerosis

Cannabinoids have been shown to have a beneficial effect in both animal models of multiple sclerosis (MS) and human disease, although the mechanisms of action are unclear. We examined expression of the major cannabinoid receptors [(CBRs) cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1) and cannabinoid receptor 2 (CB2)] and a key enzyme involved in synthesis of the endocannabinoid anandamide [N-acyl phosphatidylethanolamine phospholipase D (NAPE-PLD)] in autopsy brain samples from patients with MS. CB1 was expressed in neurons, injured axons, oligodendrocytes, macrophages/microglia, some astrocytes, endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells and pericytes. CB2 and NAPE-PLD were localized to cerebral endothelial cells, pericytes, smooth muscle cells, astrocytes and macrophages/microglia. NAPE-PLD immunoreactivity was also seen in neurons. Endothelial CB2 expression was greatest in chronic inactive plaques, and in areas was seen in segments of endothelium where the endothelial expression of adhesion molecules (VCAM-1 and ICAM-1) was focally undetectable, and was often expressed in areas of blood-brain barrier damage. Vascular density was increased in chronic active plaques and normal-appearing white matter compared with controls. These data support findings from animal models which suggest a role for the endocannabinoid system in the MS, particularly in the regulation of endothelial leukocyte adhesion and the cellular response to injury.     

Beneficial effects of cannabinoids (CB) in a murine model of allergen-induced airway inflammation: role of CB1/CB2 receptors

The endocannabinoid system (ECS) consists of two cannabinoid (CB) receptors, namely CB₁ and CB₂ receptor, and their endogenous (endocannabinoids) and exogenous (cannabinoids, e.g. delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)) ligands which bind to these receptors. Based on studies suggesting a role of THC and the ECS in inflammation, the objective of this study was to examine their involvement in type I hypersensitivity using a murine model of allergic airway inflammation. THC treatment of C57BL/6 wildtype mice dramatically reduced airway inflammation as determined by significantly reduced total cell counts in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL). These effects were greatest when mice were treated during both, the sensitization and the challenge phase. Furthermore, systemic immune responses were significantly suppressed in mice which received THC during sensitization phase. To investigate a role of CB_1/2 receptors in this setting, we used pharmacological blockade of CB₁ and/or CB₂ receptors by the selective antagonists and moreover CB₁/CB₂ receptor double-knockout mice (CB₁^−/−/CB₂^−/−) and found neither significant changes in the cell patterns in BAL nor in immunoglobulin levels as compared to wildtype mice. Our results indicate that the activation of the ECS by applying the agonist THC is involved in the development of type I allergies. However, CB₁/CB₂ receptor-independent signalling seems likely in the observed results.     

CRIP1a switches cannabinoid receptor agonist/antagonist-mediated protection from glutamate excitotoxicity

A shared pathology among many neurological and neurodegenerative disorders is neuronal loss. Cannabinoids have been shown to be neuroprotective in multiple systems. However, both agonists and antagonists of the CB₁ cannabinoid receptor are neuroprotective, but the mechanisms responsible for these actions remain unclear. Recently a CB₁ receptor interacting protein, CRIP1a, was identified and found to alter CB₁ activity. Here we show that in an assay of glutamate neurotoxicity in primary neuronal cortical cultures CRIP1a disrupts agonist-induced neuroprotection and confers antagonist-induced neuroprotection.     

Stress-induced analgesia

For over 30 years, scientists have been investigating the phenomenon of pain suppression upon exposure to unconditioned or conditioned stressful stimuli, commonly known as stress-induced analgesia. These studies have revealed that individual sensitivity to stress-induced analgesia can vary greatly and that this sensitivity is coupled to many different phenotypes including the degree of opioid sensitivity and startle response. Furthermore, stress-induced analgesia is influenced by age, gender, and prior experience to stressful, painful, or other environmental stimuli. Stress-induced analgesia is mediated by activation of the descending inhibitory pain pathway. Pharmacological and neurochemical studies have demonstrated involvement of a large number of neurotransmitters and neuropeptides. In particular, there are key roles for the endogenous opioid, monoamine, cannabinoid, γ-aminobutyric acid and glutamate systems. The study of stress-induced analgesia has enhanced our understanding of the fundamental physiology of pain and stress and can be a useful approach for uncovering new therapeutic targets for the treatment of pain and stress-related disorders.     

Endogenous cannabinoids improve myocardial resistance to arrhythmogenic effects of coronary occlusion and reperfusion: a possible mechanism

Stimulation of cannabinoid receptors with endogenous cannabinoid anandamide and its enzyme-resistant analogue R-(+)-methanandamide improved cardiac resistance to arrhythmias induced by coronary occlusion and reperfusion. This antiarrhythmic effect was not associated with activation of NO synthase, since pretreatment with NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester had no effect on the incidence of ischemia/reperfusion-induced arrhythmias. Blockade of ATP-dependent K+ channels with glybenclamide did not abolish the antiarrhythmic effect of R-(+)-methanandamide. Antiarrhythmic activity of endogenous cannabinoids is probably associated with their direct effects on the myocardium.     

IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL DISTRIBUTION OF CANNABINOID CB 1 RECEPTOR IN THE RAT CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM

IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL DISTRIBUTION OF CANNABINOID CB 1 RECEPTOR IN THE RAT CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM@邹冈     

The CB1 cannabinoid receptor mediates glutamatergic synaptic suppression in the hippocampus

Cannabinoids have profound effects on synaptic function and behavior. Of the two cloned cannabinoid receptors, cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1) is widely distributed in the CNS and accounts for most of the neurological effects of cannabinoids, while cannabinoid receptor 2 (CB2) expression in the CNS is very limited. The presence of additional receptors [i.e. cannabinoid receptor 3 (CB3)] is suggested by growing evidence of cannabinoid effects that are not mediated by CB1 or CB2. The most direct functional evidence for a CB3 comes from a study in hippocampus where deletion of CB1 was shown to have no effect on cannabinoid-mediated suppression of the excitatory synapse between Schaffer collateral/commissural fibers and CA1 pyramidal cells [Novel cannabinoid-sensitive receptor mediates inhibition of glutamatergic synaptic transmission in the hippocampus. Neuroscience 106:1-4]. In contrast, we report here that in extracellular field recordings, the cannabinoid agonist WIN 55,212-2 (5 microM) had no effect on Schaffer collateral/commissural fiber-CA1 pyramidal cell (Sch-CA1) synaptic transmission in slices from two independently made cannabinoid receptor 1-/- lines [Zimmer et al 1999 and Ledent et al 1999] while strongly suppressing Sch-CA1 synaptic transmission in CB1+/+ mice of the background strains. Also, we observed robust cannabinoid-mediated suppression of the Sch-CA1 synapse in pure C57BL/6 mice, contradicting a recent report that cannabinoid suppression of this synapse is absent in this strain [Hoffman AF, Macgill AM, Smith D, Oz M, Lupica CR (2005) Species and strain differences in the expression of a novel glutamate-modulating cannabinoid receptor in the rodent hippocampus. Eur J Neurosci 22:2387-2391]. Our results strongly suggest that cannabinoid-induced suppression of the Sch-CA1 synapse is mediated by CB1. Non-canonical cannabinoid receptors do not seem to play a major role in inhibiting transmitter release at this synapse.     

The cannabinoid receptor agonist, WIN 55,212-2, inhibits cool-specific lamina I medullary dorsal horn neurons

Cannabinoid receptor agonists have been demonstrated to inhibit medullary and spinal cord dorsal horn nociceptive neurons. The effect of cannabinoids on thermoreceptive specific neurons in the spinal or medullary dorsal horn remains unknown. In the present study, single-unit recordings from the rat medullary dorsal horn were performed to examine the effect of a cannabinoid receptor agonists on cold-specific lamina I spinothalamic tract neurons. The cannabinoid CB1/CB2 receptor agonist, WIN 55,212-2 (WIN-2), was locally applied to the medullary dorsal horn and the neuronal activity evoked by cooling the receptive field was recorded. WIN-2 (1 microg/microl and 2 microg/microl) significantly attenuated cold-evoked activity. Co-administration of the CB1 receptor antagonist SR 141716 with WIN-2 did not affect cold-evoked activity. These results demonstrate a potential mechanism by which cannabinoids produce hypothermia, and also suggest that cannabinoids may affect non-noxious thermal discrimination.     

The optimal distance between two electrode tips during recording of compound nerve action potentials in the rat median nerve简

The distance between the two electrode tips can greatly influence the parameters used for record- ing compound nerve action potentials. To investigate the optimal parameters for these recordings in the rat median nerve, we dissociated the nerve using different methods and compound nerve action potentials were orthodromically or antidromically recorded with different electrode spac- ings. Compound nerve action potentials could be consistently recorded using a method in which the middle part of the median nerve was intact, with both ends dissociated from the surrounding fascia and a ground wire inserted into the muscle close to the intact part. When the distance be- tween two stimulating electrode tips was increased, the threshold and supramaximal stimulating intensity of compound nerve action potentials were gradually decreased, but the amplitude was not changed significantly. When the distance between two recording electrode tips was increased, the amplitude was gradually increased, but the threshold and supramaximal stimulating intensity exhibited no significant change. Different distances between recording and stimulating sites did not produce significant effects on the aforementioned parameters. A distance of 5 mm between recording and stimulating electrodes and a distance of 10 mm between recording and stimulating sites were found to be optimal for compound nerve action potential recording in the rat median nerve. In addition, the orthodromic compound action potential, with a biphasic waveform that was more stable and displayed less interference （however also required a higher threshold and higher supramaximal stimulus）, was found to be superior to the antidromic compound action potential.