Should harm minimization as an approach to adolescent substance use be embraced by junior and senior high schools?: Empirical evidence from An integrated school- and community-based demonstration intervention addressing drug use among adolescents

The objective of this demonstration project was to determine if school-based harm minimization drug education was potentially acceptable and effective for junior and senior high school students in Nova Scotia. We conducted a four-year quasi-experimental intervention using mixed quantitative and qualitative methodologies. The intervention was a co-operative participatory research project with various activities determined by the participants. The project involved a partnership of four schools, two school boards, two regional addiction services, the provincial department of health, and a university. The outcomes evaluation was based on a sample of 1117 and 849 students in the intervention schools, compared with 3755 and 4247 students in the rest of the province, in 1998 and 2002, respectively. The evaluation of acceptability was based on an analysis of 491 documents generated from 1998 to 2002. The outcomes of effectiveness were specific risks and harmful consequences associated with substance use. We found that harm minimization was an acceptable approach to drug education targeting the senior high school population, and there was also some evidence of effectiveness in that age group in that the prevalence of several risks and negative consequences of substance use decreased significantly in the intervention schools relative to the rest of the province. In junior high school, harm minimization was found to not be an acceptable approach to drug education. This demonstration project provides evidence that school-based harm minimization may be acceptable and effective in senior high schools but may not be acceptable in junior high schools.     

教育研究中的问题及评价

教育科学研究是探索和揭示教育过程中未被认识或未被完全认识的现象、本质和规律的一种活动。而问题研究又是教育科学研究的关键,能否选择一个真问题进行研究将直接决定教育科学研究的质量与成败。本文从问题的概念分析入手,从传统认识论中真理论的观点出发并综合多位学者的观点探讨了什么是真问题,最后粗浅地分析了教育课题研究中的真问题。     

Recall of medication during pregnancy: Validity and accuracy of an adjusted questionnaire

Objective — To study the validity and accuracy of an adjusted questionnaire on medical drug use during pregnancy eight years after the pregnancy. Methods — The ability of a questionnaire on medication during pregnancy to detect actual use (= sensitivity) was tested against information collected 8 years previously (in 1983–1984) from 473 women with high-risk pregnancies who delivered at the University Hospital Nijmegen, the Netherlands. Results — For separate drug groups, the sensitivity varied between 5% and 91%. The timing of use was recalled moderately well. Although specific questions on drug groups did improve the sensitivity as compared to an earlier questionnaire, the improvement was not enough to make the questionnaire valid. High maternal education, low birth weight, low gestational age and a low 5-min Apgar score were related to better recall. The sensitivity of the questionnaire depended on the behavioural score of the child, implying recall bias. Conclusion — Questionnaire data on drug use during pregnancy obtained eight years after delivery are not a valid source of information.     

Getting to Dissemination

The combination of a stage model of psychotherapy and treatment manualization has been a major step forward in treatment development and efficacy testing, but not in dissemination. I argue that the technological model of treatment development makes research on the practical application of these technologies difficult. If we continue on our present course, research on dissemination will be uncommon, expensive, and largely irrelevant to the practical issues that need to be faced. It makes more sense to proceed directly to dissemination research. Alternative methods, including manipulated training designs, will permit this, but these fundamentally challenge the implicit assumptions of the stage model.     

The Dodo Bird: Less a Verdict Than an Opportunity

I contend that although the Luborsky et al. findings on the Dodo bird verdict are noteworthy, the methodology on which they are based is significantly delimited. Amplifying Luborsky et al.'s moderate recognition of that delimitation, I propose a qualitative complement to the extant research. I call this complement "amalgamated" qualitative research and propose that it will deepen, clarify, and contextualize Luborsky et al.'s enigmatic findings. Until this amalgam is implemented, therapy research will be relegated to impressions rather than fine-grained illuminations.     

中医脊柱手法与西医手法的对比研究

东西方在脊柱手法方面都有很多研究，近年来研究进展迅速，取得了一些进步，为临床治疗因脊柱原因引起的痛症提供了一种新的有效方法。在西方手法医学的基础上，认真研究短杠杆微调手法，对颈椎、腰椎手法进行改进，通过临床实践，手法实用效果良好。     

牡蛎形态学的研究与比较

目的 对中国药典规定的三种杜蛎的外形进行研究比较。方法 照相机拍片及用控磁共振扫描。结果 发现长牡蛎的长度及宽度均比药莫规定的高50cm要长10cm左右．宽度亦较药典规定的15cm宽得多，大连湾牡蛎与近江牡蛎与药典收载的品种描述亦均有不同程度的改变。结论 建设2005年版药典及其起草单位应进行修订。     

BP神经网络及其在药学研究中的应用

BP神经网络是目前应用最广泛的人工神经网络模型，本文详细阐述了BP神经网络的原理和特点，并论述了其在药学研究中的应用。