Potential impact of parental Tdap immunization on infant pertussis hospitalizations

We estimated the potential impact of parental Tdap immunization before delivery, at delivery and at the 2-week newborn visit on U.S. infant pertussis hospitalizations. We used published data for pertussis hospitalization rates among U.S. infants aged 0-4 months, the Tdap vaccine efficacy in adults, and the proportion of infants with pertussis <6 months of age in which either parent was the source (16-40% from mothers and 16-20% from fathers). Immunizing parents before pregnancy or ≥ 2 weeks prior to delivery should reduce pertussis hospitalizations among infants 0-4 months by 2694-9314 if both parents are vaccinated, and by 1347-6909 if only mothers are vaccinated. Greater reductions in pertussis hospitalizations would be achieved if parents are immunized ≥ 2 weeks prior to delivery than after delivery or the 2-week newborn visit. Although immunizing parents prior to pregnancy or delivery is best, immunizing parents in the postpartum period should provide protection to that newborn and to infants of subsequent pregnancies.     

At what sites are parents willing to have their 11 through 14-year-old adolescents immunized?

Introduction

Parental preferences of alternative immunization sites for adolescents must be evaluated to determine optimal delivery strategies.

Methods

Analyses were performed on data from middle-school parent questionnaires in low income areas.

Results

1838 questionnaires were returned; 86.5% of the participants were Hispanic, 65% spoke primarily Spanish at home. Among those with a medical home, 32% had the last immunization at an alternative location. When checking all that apply, 65% of parents selected the medical home as a desirable location for immunization; 41% selected a school-based program.

Conclusions

Despite lack of exposure to school-based immunization programs, school-based programs are a desirable immunization site among middle-school parents.     

The safety of immunizing with tetanus–diphtheria–acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap) less than 2 years following previous tetanus vaccination: Experience during a mass vaccination campaign of healthcare personnel during a respiratory illness outbreak

Background

Tdap is recommended for health care personnel (HCP) aged <65 years who received tetanus diphtheria or tetanus toxoid immunization (Td/TT) ≥2 years earlier. During a medical center Tdap vaccination campaign, we assessed the safety of use of a Td/TT to Tdap interval <2 years in HCP. We also describe reactogenicity in HCP who were aged ≥65 years or pregnant.

Methods

HCP vaccinated with Tdap were surveyed to assess time since last Td/TT (≥2 years vs. <2 years), age, pregnancy status, and injection site adverse events (AEs) during the 2 weeks after Tdap. AE rates were calculated and compared by non-inferiority analysis using a predetermined margin of 10%. We searched clinic logbooks to assess for clinically important adverse events during the 2 months after Tdap.

Results

Of the 4524 vaccinated HCP, 2221 (49.1%) completed a safety survey which met criteria for analysis. Non-inferiority analysis found that rates of moderate and/or severe injection site AEs were not significantly greater in those vaccinated <2 years than in those vaccinated ≥2 years after previous Td/TT. Three serious adverse events were reported during the 2 months after vaccination, none in persons who were ≥65 years, pregnant or received Td/TT <2 years before.

Conclusions

Our findings add to the body of evidence that a short interval between Td/TT and a single dose of Tdap is safe.     

Tdap booster to adolescents with juvenile idiopathic arthritis on and off anti-TNF agents is safe and immunogenic

Introduction: The response to vaccines in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients on and off anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents remains highly discussed. There are no published studies on the immune response following a Tdap booster dose in JIA patients so far.ObjectiveTo evaluate the immune response and safety after a Tdap booster in JIA patients and in healthy adolescents.MethodsNineteen adolescents with JIA according to the ILAR criteria on anti-TNF medication, 19 adolescents with JIA off anti-TNF medication, and 27 healthy adolescents (control group) were compared after a Tdap booster. Adverse events and disease activity were evaluated. Lymphocyte immunophenotyping was performed by flow cytometry. Tetanus, diphtheria and pertussis toxin antibodies were assessed by ELISA; whole blood was stimulated with whole-cell pertussis, and supernatants were assessed for cytokines by xMAP.ResultsThe three groups showed a similar frequency of adverse events. There was no disease reactivation after the Tdap booster. Tetanus, diphtheria and pertussis antibodies showed a significant response when D0 and D14 concentrations were compared in both JIA groups and controls. Over time, a different pattern of response to the Tdap booster was observed among the groups for tetanus antibodies (p = 0.005) but not for diphtheria and pertussis antibodies. In contrast to the protection attained for tetanus and diphtheria, in the three groups, not all individuals showed pertussis seroconversion at either D14 or D28. In addition, the seroconversion of three subjects with JIA on anti-TNF medication was not maintained at D28. JIA patients off anti-TNF showed a higher percentage of naive CD8 + T cells (p = 0.007) and central memory CD8 + cells (p = 0.003) and a lower percentage of effector CD8 + T cells (p = 0.003) and NK cell numbers (p = 0.018) than the control group. The JIA group off anti-TNF medication had fewer B lymphocytes than both the JIA group on anti-TNF medication and the control group (p = 0.016). Cellular immunity to Bordetella pertussis showed that IFNγ levels were significantly lower in both JIA groups than in the control group (p = 0.003), IL10 levels were higher in the JIA off anti-TNF group (p = 0.009), IL17A and IL5 levels were lower in the JIA on anti-TNF group than in the control group (p = 0.018 and p = 0.016, respectively); however, an increase in IFNγ (p = 0.008), IL17A (p = 0.030) and TNFα (p = 0.041) levels was observed at D14 in both patient groups. Both JIA groups showed higher levels of IL21 than the control group (p = 0.023).ConclusionWe conclude that individuals with JIA on or off anti-TNF agents showed a good response to a booster dose for the three antigens studied in the absence of major adverse events and without the reactivation of the disease.     

Dupilumab does not affect correlates of vaccine-induced immunity: A randomized,placebo-controlled trial in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis

1. Download high-res image (394KB)
2. Download full-size image

     

Measuring maternal Tdap and influenza vaccination rates: Comparison of two population-based methods

Pregnant women are routinely recommended to receive Tdap and influenza vaccines to prevent disease and complications among mothers and newborns. Monitoring population trends in maternal vaccination is important in order to evaluate the implementation of these recommendations and to identify pockets of need. We present two methods for measuring maternal vaccination among a state population and discuss the strengths and drawbacks of each method. First, we matched maternal information from records of Wisconsin births during 2013–2015 with maternal vaccination records in the Wisconsin Immunization Registry. Second, we used an all-payer health insurance claims database to identify Wisconsin women with deliveries during 2013–2015 and vaccinations received during pregnancy. Both methods produced similar trends and indicated a substantial increase in the percentage of women receiving Tdap during pregnancy, and lower vaccination rates among women who were Medicaid-insured. When available and timely, both methods are useful for monitoring maternal vaccination.     

Tdap vaccination during pregnancy interrupts a twenty-year increase in the incidence of pertussis

Pertussis incidence in developed countries, including Israel, has increased over the past two decades despite the addition of two booster doses in children. However, as pertussis is characterized by a multi-annual periodicity, and since clinical diagnosis can miss cases, determining disease trends at the population level is challenging. To bridge this gap, we developed a simple statistical model to capture the temporal patterns of pertussis incidence in Israel. Our model was calibrated and tested using laboratory-confirmed cases of pertussis for the Israeli population between 1998 and 2019. The model identifies a clear four-year periodicity of pertussis incidence over the past two decades that is identical to the one observed in the pre-vaccine era. Accounting for this periodicity, the model shows a 325% increase in pertussis incidence from 2002 to 2014. These multi-year trends were interrupted shortly after the introduction of routine immunization of Tdap vaccine in pregnancy in 2015, after which we found a 59.7% (95% CI: 57.7–61.6%) decline in pertussis incidence and a 49.5% (36.0–61.6%) decline in hospitalizations compared to the model’s projection. While this sharp decline cannot be fully attributed to the newly introduced vaccination policy, sharper reductions of 71.2% (65.6–76.1%) in incidence and 58.4% (39.6–72.7%) in hospitalizations, have been observed in infants of age two months and below - young infants that have yet to become vaccinated and are more likely to be protected by maternal vaccination. Our work suggests that Tdap vaccination during pregnancy is a promising policy for controlling pertussis. Furthermore, due to the stable periodicity of pertussis, public health decision-makers should invest continuous efforts in the implementation of this strategy with additional reinforcement in expected peak years.     

Reactogenicity and immunogenicity of tetanus toxoid,reduced diphtheria toxoid,and acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap) in pregnant and nonpregnant women

ObjectiveTetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertusiss (Tdap) vaccine is recommended during each pregnancy, regardless of prior receipt. Data on reactogenicity and immunogenicity, particularly after repeated Tdap, are limited. We compared local injection-site and systemic reactions and serologic response following Tdap in (1) pregnant and nonpregnant women and (2) pregnant women by self-reported prior Tdap receipt.Study designPregnant women (gestational age 20–34 weeks) and nonpregnant women receiving Tdap were enrolled in this observational study. Injection-site and systemic reactions were assessed for one week post-vaccination. Pertussis toxin, filamentous hemagglutinin, pertactin, fimbriae, tetanus and diphtheria specific IgG antibody titers were determined by standardized enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay at baseline and 28 days post-vaccination. Reactogenicity and serologic responses were compared by pregnancy status, and within pregnant women by self-reported prior Tdap receipt.Results374 pregnant and 225 nonpregnant women were vaccinated. Severe local or systemic reactions or “any” fever were uncommon (≤3% for both groups). Moderate/severe injection-site pain was significantly higher in pregnant (17.9%) versus nonpregnant (11.1%) women, but did not prompt a healthcare visit. Proportions of other moderate/severe or any severe reactions were not significantly higher in pregnant compared to nonpregnant women. Moderate/severe (including pain) and severe reactions were not significantly higher in pregnant women receiving repeat versus first-time Tdap. Antibody titers increased from baseline to post-vaccination for all vaccine antigens in pregnant and nonpregnant women; post-vaccination titers against pertussis toxin and filamentous hemagglutinin were significantly higher in nonpregnant versus pregnant women (p < 0.01).ConclusionTdap was well-tolerated in pregnant and nonpregnant women. Pregnant women were more likely to report moderate/severe pain at the Tdap injection-site compared with nonpregnant women, but did not necessitate medical visits. Prior Tdap receipt did not increase occurrence of moderate/severe local or systemic reactions in pregnant women. Serologic responses to all vaccine antigens were robust.Clinical Trial Registration@ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT02209623.https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02209623.