《中华整形外科杂志》2001-2005年论文被引分析

目的从文献引证角度透视《中华整形外科杂志》的办刊水平和期刊的编辑特点。方法依据CNKI《中国引文数据库》,采用文献计量学方法对《中华整形外科杂志》2001至2005年载文被CNKI源数据库文献引用情况进行统计分析和评价。结果2001至2005年《中华整形外科杂志》共载文1045篇,被CNKI引用530篇,占载文的50.72%;这些论文被引用1598频次,单篇平均被引3.02次。引用该刊的有289种期刊,他引率为92.43%,自引率为7.57%。被引论文作者群遍布国内25个省及直辖市,北京、上海、陕西和广东,在整形外科学研究领域居于前列。结论《中华整形外科杂志》所载文献质量较高,发表的论文能够反映整形外科学的发展和最新研究动态。该刊不仅是国内整形外科学研究领域最重要的信息源之一,也是国内医学领域的主要核心期刊之一。     

2004-2006年《中华护理杂志》载文分析

目的分析《中华护理杂志》2004～2006年的载文特点，了解该刊的编辑质量和期刊论文的学术水平，为进一步办好刊物提供依据。方法依据《中国期刊网全文期刊数据库》（CNKI）与手工检索，统计2004～2006年出版的《中华护理杂志》所载论文的多项文献定量指标。结果《中华护理杂志》3年总载文量为1514篇，期均篇数为42．05篇，篇均页数为2．05页。在栏目中，临床护理研究发文数量最多，占总发文量的30．38％。在引文统计中，平均引文率为90．75％，英文引文条数平均占40．09％。在发文时滞统计中，最长为630d，最短为60d，平均为287．2d。在作者职称和学位统计中，作者的级别越来越高。在作者分布统计中，北京作者人数最多，有325名，占21．47%。结论《中华护理杂志》所载文献质量较高。该刊不仅是中国护理学研究领域最重要的信息源之一，也是中国医学领域的主要核心期刊。     

《上海精神医学》2003～2006年载文分析

目的分析《上海精神医学》2003～2006年刊载的文章及其引文,探讨该刊刊载特征。方法统计该刊4年刊载的477篇文章类型、作者、作者单位分布、280篇论著引文的引文量、引文语种、引文类型、引文时间分布。结果（1）在477篇文章中,排名前10位的作者单位共发表文章256篇（53．7％）,在356名第1作者中,24名发表≥3篇的作者。载文类型有16种。（2）280篇论著中论文合著率为97．1％,平均合作度为4．7。280篇论著的引文率为100％,总引文量2335条,平均每篇论著引文8．34条,其中外语语种（以英文为主）占61．07％;中文占38．67％;引文以期刊为主,期刊自引率为5．18％;普莱斯指数为50．45％;被引文献的文献峰值（0．109）为论文发表后第5年。结论《上海精神医学》载文类型多,论著引文语种主要为英文,文献引用具有新颖性。     

实用皮肤病医学期刊论文关键词的标引探析

期刊论文关键词是一种直接取自文献主题中有实质意义的词,利用关键词法实行计算机编制索引,方法简便,速度加快,最能体现出论文的思想和方法的内容,准确的标引可以影响到检索效果。该文重点对《实用皮肤病学杂志》关键词的标引原则及几种内容较为复杂的医学论文关键词标引方法进行分析和阐述。     

Helping general practitioners to keep up with the literature: evaluation of an RCGP initiative

The recent Report of The Medical Information Review Panel suggested that locally-produced abstracting bulletins are likely to be of great value in promoting continuing education; most notably by helping GPs to 'keep up with the literature'. The Report identified Current Medical Abstracts for Practitioners (CMAP) , a publication produced by the S.E. Scotland Faculty of the Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP), as an example of the kind of bulletin it had in mind. It further suggested that the role and effectiveness of this publication should be investigated.
A survey of the readership of CMAP was therefore carried out. It was found that CMAP is regularly read by only 28% of those to whom it is sent (free of charge). More particularly, CMAP is read predominantly by those GPs who are already conscientious users of medical literature: they use the bulletin as a complement and supplement to their other professional reading. Those GPs who devote little time to journal reading, in general, tend to ignore CMAP. They do not seek to use it as a substitute for more extensive reading of medical journals.
It therefore appears that CMAP does little to overcome the problem of GPs who do not keep up with the literature, and it is unlikely that similar publications will be initiated in other areas. Indeed, publication of CMAP may be ceased, at least in its present form.     

Introducing students to the medical literature

It is extremely difficult to determine if it really makes a difference to provide a medical journal to medical students. Does it alter their reading habits? Does it indeed form the basis for learning? In 1976 84% of the third year class and in 1972 69% (n= 97 ), personally subscribed to a Journal designated. In the fourth year class, 75% (n= 149 ) subscribed in 1976 and 58% (n = 82 ) in 1972. The conclusion is that the New England Journal of Medicine Project can be viewed as an endeavour which meets the need of students.     

Statement on Publication Ethics for Editors and Publishers

The digitization and related developments in journal editing and publishing necessitate increasing the awareness of all stakeholders of science communication in the emerging global problems and possible solutions. Journal editors and publishers are frequently encountered with the fast-growing problems of authorship, conflicts of interest, peer review, research misconduct, unethical citations, and inappropriate journal impact metrics. While the number of erroneous and unethical research papers and wasteful, or ''predatory'', journals is increasing exponentially, responsible editors are urged to ''clean'' the literature by correcting or retracting related articles. Indexers are advised to implement measures for accepting truly influential and ethical journals and delisting sources with predatory publishing practices. Updating knowledge and skills of authors, editors and publishers, developing and endorsing recommendations of global editorial associations, and (re)drafting journal instructions can be viewed as potential tools for improving ethics of academic journals. The aim of this Statement is to increase awareness of all stakeholders of science communication of the emerging ethical issues in journal editing and publishing and initiate a campaign of upgrading and enforcing related journal instructions.     

《中国临床心理学杂志》心理咨询与治疗文章(1993-2007)内容分析

目的:分析<中国临床心理学杂志>从1993年创刊到2007年刊载的心理咨询与治疗领域的文章,作为了解该领域学者们研究视角、关注热点及其发展变化趋势的参考. 方法:对筛选出的心理治疗与咨询204篇相关文章进行内容分析,并对文章的研究者及其所属机构、研究.方法、被试群体均进行统计. 结果:心理治疗与咨询类文章约占该刊所发表文章的十分之一,按内容被划分为七类,疗效研究所占比例最高.实证研究多于非实证研究.被试群体以成人为主,大学生次之.在心理咨询和治疗领域中发表论文最多的机构和个人均为医学背景. 结论:做为核心期刊.<中国临床心理学杂志>15年间所发表的心理咨询与治疗的文章反应了这一领域在中国的发展变化,是心理咨询与治疗研究者与实践者的重要参考刊物.