A meta-analysis of the pros and cons of partial superficial parotidectomy versus superficial parotidectomy for the treatment of benign parotid neoplasms

ObjectivesSalivary gland tumors are predominantly benign and frequently localized in the parotid gland (P). The treatment consists primarily of surgical removal; however, the appropriate extent remains a subject of debate. In suitable tumors, superficial parotidectomy (SP) may be substituted for less invasive partial superficial parotidectomy (PSP) (I C). This systematic review analyzed the available literature, comparing PSP and SP with regards to several postoperative outcome parameters (O).Materials and methodsEstablished medical databanks were screened for articles evaluating outcomes of PSP compared with SP, published between 1955 and 2019. These data were assessed by pooled risk and odds ratios via meta-analysis.Results11 studies with 1272 patients were included. There was no significant difference in tumor recurrence between PSP and SP (primary outcome). Furthermore, no differences in the occurrence of permanent facial nerve paralysis (FNP), salivary fistula, great auricular nerve analgesia, or hematoma were observed between the groups. However, PSP displayed significantly reduced rates of transient FNP, Frey's syndrome, scar deformity, and xerostomia, as well as shorter surgical time, compared with SP (secondary outcomes).ConclusionBased on these data, PSP can be recommended as a surgical technique for the treatment of superficially located, small, benign parotid tumors.     

Fitting the Balding–Nichols model to forensic databases

Large forensic databases provide an opportunity to compare observed empirical rates of genotype matching with those expected under forensic genetic models. A number of researchers have taken advantage of this opportunity to validate some forensic genetic approaches, particularly to ensure that estimated rates of genotype matching between unrelated individuals are indeed slight overestimates of those observed. However, these studies have also revealed systematic error trends in genotype probability estimates. In this analysis, we investigate these error trends and show how they result from inappropriate implementation of the Balding–Nichols model in the context of database-wide matching. Specifically, we show that in addition to accounting for increased allelic matching between individuals with recent shared ancestry, studies must account for relatively decreased allelic matching between individuals with more ancient shared ancestry.     

Anatomical basis for the intrahepatic glissonian approach during hepatectomies

Background

Anatomical liver resections are based on some basic technical principles such as vascular control, ischemic area delineation to be resected and maximum parenchymal preservation. These aspects are achieved by the intrahepatic glissonian approach, which consists in accessing the pedicles of hepatic segments within the hepatic parenchyma. Small incisions on well-defined anatomical landmarks are performed to approach the pedicles, making dissection of the hilar plate unnecessary.

Aim

Analyze parameters in liver anatomy related to intrahepatic surgical technique to glissonians pedicles, to set the normal anatomy related to the procedure and thereby facilitate the attainment of this technique.

Methods

Anatomical parameters related to the intrahepatic glissonian approach were studied in 37 cadavers. Measurements were performed with precision instruments. Data were expressed as mean±standard deviation. The subjects were divided into groups according to gender and liver weight and groups were compared statistically.

Results

Twenty-five cadavers were male and 12 female. No statistically significant difference was observed in virtually all parameters when groups were compared. This demonstrates the consistency of the anatomical parameters related to the intrahepatic glissonian approach.

Conclusion

The results obtained in this study made possible major technical advances in the realization of open and laparoscopic hepatectomies with intrahepatic glissonian approach, and can help surgeons to perform liver resections by this method.     

The Feasibility of Hepatic Resections Using a Bipolar Radiofrequency Device (Habib?)

The bipolar radiofrequency device (Habib®) has been recently introduced in order to reduce intraoperative bleeding for a safe hepatic resection as an alternative to the conventional tools. However, indications, perioperative findings, and outcome of the device for hepatic resections remain and deserve to be analyzed. The current study aims to analyze the feasibility of the bipolar radiofrequency device (Habib®) for hepatic resections. Information of the patients that underwent hepatic resection using with the Habib® device between 2007 and 2011 was abstracted. Patient, disease, and operation-related findings and perioperative data were investigated. A total of 71 cases (38 [53.5 %] males, mean age was 56.8 ± 11.9) were analyzed. Metastatic disease (n = 55; 77.5 %) was the leading indication followed by primary liver and biliary malignancies (n = 7; 9.9 %), hemangioma (n = 5; 7 %), hydatid disease (n = 3; 2.8 %), and hepatic gunshot trauma (n = 1; 1.4 %). Metastasectomy was the most commonly performed procedure (n = 31; 56.3 %), but in 24 (77.4 %) cases, it was performed in addition to extended resections. Other procedures in the study patients include segmentectomy in 17, bisegmentectomy in 19, trisegmentectomy in 17, right or left hepatectomy in 8, and extended right/left hepatectomy in 3. The mean (±SD) operation time was 241.7 ± 78.2 min. The median amount of bleeding was 300 cc (range 25–2500), and 23 (32.4 %) cases required perioperative transfusion. The median hospitalization period was 5 days (range 1–47). Lengthened drainage (n = 9, 12.7 %) and intraabdominal abscess (n = 8, 11.23 %) were the most common problems. Hepatic resections using the Habib® device seem to be feasible in cases with primary and metastatic hepatic lesions and benign liver masses and even those with hepatic trauma. It may lessen the amount of intraoperative hemorrhage, although lengthened drainage and intraabdominal abscess were the major postoperative problems in these cases.     

Five-Years Trigger Finger Due to Partial Flexor Tendon Laceration in a Child

Trigger finger (TF) is a condition that affects quality of life and one of the most common causes of hand pain and disability. TF is characterized by catching, snapping or locking of the involved finger flexor tendon, associated with pain. TF in the children occurs rarely than in adults and partial tendon laceration is an uncommon cause of TF in the children. Thus, our aim in this study to define TF due to partial flexor tendon laceration in a child.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s12593-015-0180-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.     

胆汁酸在梗阻性黄疸小鼠肝部分切除术后肝再生中作用的研究

目的：探讨胆汁酸（CA）在梗阻性黄疸（OJ）小鼠肝部分切除术后肝再生中的作用及机制。 方法：180只健康雄性小鼠随机均分为6组,分别行假手术（对照组）、胆总管结扎（OJ组）、胆总管结扎并于7 d加行外引流（ED组）、胆总管结扎+0.2%CA灌胃并7 d后加行外引流（ED+0.2%CA组）、胆总管结扎+1%CA灌胃并于7 d后加行外引流（ED+1%CA组）、胆总管结扎并于7 d后加行内引流（ID组）,各组分别于实验第14天行70%肝切除,且各外引流组改行内引流。检测各组肝切除术后不同时间点肝再生率与肝组织增殖细胞核抗原Ki-67表达、叉状头盒M1b基因（Foxm1b）mRNA相对表达、成纤维细胞生长因子受体4（FGFR4）蛋白表达,并观察部分组肝细胞原位凋亡情况。 结果：除对照组外,肝再生率、肝组织Ki-67阳性表达率、Foxm1b mRNA及FGFR4蛋白表达在其余各组均由高到低依次为：ID组>ED+0.2%CA组>ED组>OJ组>ED+1%CA组,组间差异均有统计学意义（均P<0.05）;ID组与对照组间各指标差异均无统计学意义（均P>0.05）;肝细胞凋亡率由高到低依次为：ED+1%C组>ED组>ED+0.2%CA组>对照组,组间差异均有统计学意义（均P<0.05）。 结论：内引流通过减少内源性CA的丢失有利于肝切除后肝再生;外源性低浓度CA可以恢复外引流引起的肝再生障碍,可能与其上调Foxm1b与FGFR4的表达从而促进肝再生有关。     

The Safety and Efficacy of Approaches to Liver Resection: A Meta-Analysis

Background:The aim of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of conventional laparotomy with those of robotic and laparoscopic approaches to hepatectomy.Database:Independent reviewers conducted a systematic review of publications in PubMed and Embase, with searches limited to comparative articles of laparoscopic hepatectomy with either conventional or robotic liver approaches. Outcomes included total operative time, estimated blood loss, length of hospitalization, resection margins, postoperative complications, perioperative mortality rates, and cost measures. Outcome comparisons were calculated using random-effects models to pool estimates of mean net differences or of the relative risk between group outcomes. Forty-nine articles, representing 3702 patients, comprise this analysis: 1901 (51.35%) underwent a laparoscopic approach, 1741 (47.03%) underwent an open approach, and 60 (1.62%) underwent a robotic approach. There was no difference in total operative times, surgical margins, or perioperative mortality rates among groups. Across all outcome measures, laparoscopic and robotic approaches showed no difference. As compared with the minimally invasive groups, patients undergoing laparotomy had a greater estimated blood loss (pooled mean net change, 152.0 mL; 95% confidence interval, 103.3–200.8 mL), a longer length of hospital stay (pooled mean difference, 2.22 days; 95% confidence interval, 1.78–2.66 days), and a higher total complication rate (odds ratio, 0.5; 95% confidence interval, 0.42–0.57).Conclusion:Minimally invasive approaches to liver resection are as safe as conventional laparotomy, affording less estimated blood loss, shorter lengths of hospitalization, lower perioperative complication rates, and equitable oncologic integrity and postoperative mortality rates. There was no proven advantage of robotic approaches compared with laparoscopic approaches.     

自体肝移植治疗终末期肝泡型包虫病一例

@@