Preferences for hospital quality in Zambia: results from a discrete choice experiment

This study reports on the results of a discrete choice experiment undertaken in Zambia to assess the factors influencing the demand for hospital care in Zambia, in particular the role of (perceived) quality and trade-offs between price and quality. Valuations of quality were evaluated for the treatment of two acute medical conditions, cerebral malaria in adults and acute pneumonia in children. Marginal utilities and willingness-to-pay for attributes of quality of hospital care were estimated, together with the influence of socioeconomic characteristics on these valuations and the extent of non-linearities in valuations of time and money. We find the technical quality of care, as represented by the thoroughness of examination, to be the most important quality attribute, followed by staff attitudes and drug availability. Valuations of examination thoroughness increase with increasing socioeconomic status. The disutility of cost was found to decrease with higher socioeconomic status, as was the value of drug availability. The implications of the findings for Zambian hospital sector reforms are discussed.     

Preferences of patients for emergency services available during usual GP surgery hours: a discrete choice experiment

OBJECTIVE: A study was undertaken to investigate patients' strength of preferences for attributes or characteristics associated with delivery of emergency primary care services available during usual GP surgery hours and to investigate the trade-offs between attributes. METHODS: A discrete choice experiment was used to quantify patients' strength of preferences for several key attributes of usual-hours emergency primary care. The attributes were chosen to reflect the findings of previous research, current policy initiatives and discussions with local key stakeholders. A self-complete questionnaire was administered to NHS Direct callers and adult attenders at Accident and Emergency, GP services and the NHS Walk-in Centre in the locality. Regression analysis was used to estimate the relative importance to patients of the different attributes. RESULTS: An overall response of 71% (n=432) was achieved. All but one of the attributes was a statistically significant predictor of preference. The attribute 'being kept informed about waiting time' was the most important. This was followed by 'quality of the consultation', 'having a consultation with a nurse', 'having a consultation with a doctor' and 'contacting the service in person'. Respondents were prepared to wait an extra 68 min to have a consultation with a doctor, but an extra 2 h 9 min for information about expected waiting time. There were no measurable preference differences between patients surveyed at different NHS entry points. Respondents younger than 45 years held strong preferences with respect to how they wanted to make contact with the system, whereas older respondents appeared not to hold strong preferences, seemingly indifferent between the alternatives. There was weak evidence which showed the younger group more strongly preferred accessing services via an integrated telephone system than making contact in person. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that local solutions for reforming emergency primary care during hours when the GP surgery is open should take account of the strength of patient preferences. The discrete choice method was acceptable, and the results directly informed the development of a local service framework for such care.     

A brief private group practice rotation changes junior medical students' perception of the surgical lifestyle

BACKGROUND: Surgical practice is often perceived by students as a stressful and demanding lifestyle in which personal and family issues take low priority. For students to receive a more balanced view of surgical practice, we instituted a private practice preceptorship during the last week of our junior surgery clerkship in 2001. We hypothesized that a 4-day preceptorship with surgeons in private practice would improve student perception of surgery as a valid career choice without compromising student educational performance. METHODS: From January to December 2002, 107 junior medical students were assigned to a brief preceptorship with volunteer private practice surgeons during the surgery clerkship (group 1), while 28 students did not participate in the preceptorship (group 2). We assessed student satisfaction via questionnaire and compared student grade performance between groups. RESULTS: One hundred two questionnaires (95%) were returned. Overall, the preceptor experience was rated positively (9.0+/-0.1) based on a 10-point Likert scale. All students commented on the educational or enjoyment value of the preceptorship, with 44% specifically stating that the lifestyle in private surgical practice appeared pleasant. Interestingly, 9% of students volunteered that the experience had swayed them to consider surgery as a career. Twenty-four percent of questionnaires contained negative comments, mainly concerning not enough "hands-on" participation. Grades for the clerkship did not decrease in group 1 when compared with group 2 or with historic controls (n=113). CONCLUSIONS: A 4-day private practice preceptorship at the end of the junior surgery clerkship favorably alters student perceptions of a surgical career without diminishing student grade performance.     

Ophthalmological examination of the infant. Developmental aspects

In recent years, the ophthalmic examination of infants has been of increasing interest to both clinicians and vision researchers. Clinicians have documented a greater risk of retinopathy, strabismus and amblyopia in premature infants, especially those of low birthweight. In addition to the external and retinal examination of the infant eye, a number of clinical tests can help the ophthalmologist to detect visual dysfunction through the evaluation of pupillary responses and ocular motility. Recently, the development of objective techniques (optokinetic nystagmus, forced choice preferential looking, and visually evoked potentials) have not only aided in the detection of ophthalmic disorders in infants; they have contributed to useful definitions of “normal” vision at various ages and to the understanding of factors that influence the pre- and post-gestational development of visual function.     

Gender assignment in female congenital adrenal hyperplasia: a difficult experience

OBJECTIVE: To report experience of gender (re)assignment in genotypic female (46XX) patients with congenital adrenal hyperplasia (f-CAH), a difficult and stressful experience if complicated with delayed presentation and inadvertent assignment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1983 and 2002, 70 patients with f-CAH were counselled for gender assignment. The age at diagnosis and operation, the degree of virilization, parental consanguinity, the gender preference of the families, and the factors governing the decision-making process were determined. RESULTS: Forty-one (59%) patients presented after the neonatal period. All parents had already assumed or were advised of a gender for their children, based on the suggestive appearance of the external genitalia. Consequently, 49 patients were reared as female and 21 as "male". Only nine of these "males" could be reassigned as females (mean age at presentation 7.87 months, sd 10.42). Twelve children had to be reared as "male"(mean age at presentation 55.8 months, sd 32.42) in compliance with the parents' and the study group's decision, and appropriate masculinizing reconstructive surgery was undertaken. The difference in the mean age of those reassigned as female and those who remained "male" was significant (P < 0.001). The parental consanguinity rate among the families was especially high in the 'male' patients. CONCLUSIONS It is extremely difficult to correct the gender of patients with f-CAH when they present at >2.5 years old. Furthermore, the delay in diagnosis and the male bias in choice of gender in our population might be a result of strong social pressures on families, influenced by cultural, traditional and economic factors.     

Discrete choice experiments in health economics

One method that is increasingly being used in health economics to elicit stated preferences concerning health matters is the discrete choice experiment (DCE). This editorial explores four sets of issues facing researchers who wish to employ DCE techniques: (a) normative issues about how data from DCE studies might be used to inform policy, (b) psychological issues concerning the meaningfulness of the data generated, (d) technical issues relating to how the data are generated and (d) issues relating to the generalisability of the data from DCE studies. Given current uncertainties surrounding these issues, it is our view that more caution and greater circumspection towards DCE is appropriate at this stage.     

Psycho-social influences on food choice in Southern France and Central England

This study used attitudinal scales to investigate the nature of attitudes to diet and health in a northern European country (Central England) and a southern European country (Mediterranean France). Cross-sectional studies were conducted using self-administered postal questionnaires that were distributed simultaneously in April 2001 in Montpellier, France and Nottingham, England. A stratified random sample of 1000 males and 1000 females aged 18-65 years was generated from the electoral roll in each country. The final sample comprised England: n = 826 (58% male and 42% female; mean age=44 years) and France: n = 766 (42% male and 58% female; mean age=42 years). This study has demonstrated that the pleasurable and social aspects of eating, certain food quality issues, as well as health as a value were regarded as priorities by French respondents. On the other hand, English respondents reported that organic and ethical issues and convenience were important factors influencing their food choices. In conclusion, the two populations can be differentiated overall in their attitudes and beliefs to food choice.     

Smoothing a discrete hazard function for the number of patients colonized with Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus in an intensive care unit

A new method for estimating the time to colonization of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) patients is developed in this paper. The time to colonization of MRSA is modelled using a Bayesian smoothing approach for the hazard function. There are two prior models discussed in this paper: the first difference prior and the second difference prior. The second difference prior model gives smoother estimates of the hazard functions and, when applied to data from an intensive care unit (ICU), clearly shows increasing hazard up to day 13, then a decreasing hazard. The results clearly demonstrate that the hazard is not constant and provide a useful quantification of the effect of length of stay on the risk of MRSA colonization which provides useful insight.