Phase I Study of Afatinib and Selumetinib in Patients with KRAS-Mutated Colorectal,Non-Small Cell Lung,and Pancreatic Cancer

Lessons Learned

• Afatinib and selumetinib can be combined in continuous and intermittent dosing schedules, albeit at lower doses than approved for monotherapy.
• Maximum tolerated dose for continuous and intermittent schedules is afatinib 20 mg once daily and selumetinib 25 mg b.i.d.
• Because the anticancer activity was limited, further development of this combination is not recommended until better biomarkers for response and resistance are defined.

BackgroundAntitumor effects of MEK inhibitors are limited in KRAS‐mutated tumors because of feedback activation of upstream epidermal growth factor receptors, which reactivates the MAPK and the phosphoinositide 3‐kinase–AKT pathway. Therefore, this phase I trial was initiated with the pan‐HER inhibitor afatinib plus the MEK inhibitor selumetinib in patients with KRAS mutant, PIK3CA wild‐type tumors.MethodsAfatinib and selumetinib were administered according to a 3+3 design in continuous and intermittent schedules. The primary objective was safety, and the secondary objective was clinical efficacy.ResultsTwenty‐six patients were enrolled with colorectal cancer (n = 19), non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (n = 6), and pancreatic cancer (n = 1). Dose‐limiting toxicities occurred in six patients, including grade 3 diarrhea, dehydration, decreased appetite, nausea, vomiting, and mucositis. The recommended phase II dose (RP2D) was 20 mg afatinib once daily (QD) and 25 mg selumetinib b.i.d. (21 days on/7 days off) for continuous afatinib dosing and for intermittent dosing with both drugs 5 days on/2 days off. Efficacy was limited with disease stabilization for 221 days in a patient with NSCLC as best response.ConclusionAfatinib and selumetinib can be combined in continuous and intermittent schedules in patients with KRAS mutant tumors. Although target engagement was observed, the clinical efficacy was limited.     

KRAS as a druggable target in NSCLC: Rising like a phoenix after decades of development failures

Cancers of nearly all lineages harbor alterations that deregulate mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling, a crucial signaling pathway for tumor formation and maintenance. Of these, KRAS mutations are the most frequent gain-of-function alterations found in patients with cancer. In particular they represents the most common molecular alteration detected in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounting for up to 25% of all oncogenic mutations. They were identified decades ago and prior efforts to target these proteins have been unsuccessful. KRAS mutation profiles (i.e. frequency of specific codon substitutions) in smokers and never-smokers are distinct and not all KRAS alterations are driver mutations. KRAS has evolved from a mutation with possible predictive value to a therapeutic target with great promise. Here, we will discuss the biology of KRAS in lung cancer and its clinical implications in oncology today and in the foreseeable future.     

The KRAS/Lin28B axis maintains stemness of pancreatic cancer cells via the let‐7i/TET3 pathway

Increasing evidence demonstrates that Lin28B plays critical roles in numerous biological processes including cell proliferation and stemness maintenance. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying Lin28B nuclear translocation remain poorly understood. Here, we found for the first time that KRAS promoted Lin28B nuclear translocation through PKCβ, which directly bound to and phosphorylated Lin28B at S243. Firstly, we observed that Lin28B was upregulated in pancreatic cancer, contributing to cellular migration and proliferation. Furthermore, nuclear Lin28B upregulated TET3 messenger RNA and protein levels by blocking the production of mature let‐7i. Subsequently, increased TET3 expression could also promote the expression of Lin28B, thereby forming a Lin28B/let‐7i/TET3 feedback loop. Our results suggest that the KRAS/Lin28B axis drives the let‐7i/TET3 pathway to maintain the stemness of pancreatic cancer cells. These findings illuminate the distinct mechanism of Lin28B nuclear translocation and its important roles in KRAS‐driven pancreatic cancer, and have important implications for development of novel therapeutic strategies for this cancer.

Abbreviations

CCK‐8

cell counting kit‐8

CSC

cancer stem cells

IP

immunoprecipitation

MUT

mutant type

NLS

nuclear localization signal

PC

pancreatic cancer

PCSC

pancreatic cancer stem cells

PKC

protein kinase C

WT

wild‐type

     

Next generation sequencing in synovial sarcoma reveals novel gene mutations

Over 95% of all synovial sarcomas (SS) share a unique translocation, t(X;18), however, they show heterogeneous clinical behavior. We analyzed multiple SS to reveal additional genetic alterations besides the translocation. Twenty-six SS from 22 patients were sequenced for 409 cancer-related genes using the Comprehensive Cancer Panel (Life Technologies, USA) on an Ion Torrent platform. The detected variants were verified by Sanger sequencing and compared to matched normal DNAs. Copy number variation was assessed in six tumors using the Oncoscan array (Affymetrix, USA). In total, eight somatic mutations were detected in eight samples. These mutations have not been reported previously in SS. Two of these, in KRAS and CCND1, represent known oncogenic mutations in other malignancies. Additional mutations were detected in RNF213, SEPT9, KDR, CSMD3, MLH1 and ERBB4. DNA alterations occurred more often in adult tumors. A distinctive loss of 6q was found in a metastatic lesion progressing under pazopanib, but not in the responding lesion. Our results emphasize t(X;18) as a single initiating event in SS and as the main oncogenic driver. Our results also show the occurrence of additional genetic events, mutations or chromosomal aberrations, occurring more frequently in SS with an onset in adults.     

Does KRAS mutation status impact the risk of local recurrence after R1 vascular resection for colorectal liver metastasis? An observational cohort study

IntroductionR0 margin is the standard in the surgical treatment of colorectal liver metastases (CLM). Recently R1 surgery, at least that enabling CLM vessel-detachment (R1vasc), seems comparable to R0. As a possible background of that biologic factors could play some role. Among them, KRAS has been investigated in the present study.MethodsPatients who underwent curative surgery for CLM between 2008 and 2016 were identified. R0, R1vasc and parenchymal R1 (R1par; tumor exposure once dissected from the parenchyma) resections with known KRAS status were analyzed.ResultsOf 1000 resection areas in 340 patients, 654 (65%) R0, 98 (10%) R1vasc and 248 (25%) R1par. In mutated KRAS (mKRAS), local recurrence (LR) was similar between R0 and R1vasc (per-patient 4,8% vs. 2%, p = 0.628; per-area 2,1% vs. 1,9%, p = 0.940), while higher in R1par (per-patient 25,4% and per-area 19,5%; p < 0.001 for both). In wild-type KRAS (wtKRAS), R0 had less LR compared to R1vasc (per-patient 7,6% vs 14,6%, p = 0.335; per-area 3,1% vs 13,3%, p = 0.012) and R1par (per-patient 18,3%, p = 0.060; per-area 9,9%, p = 0.013). KRAS did not impact LR in R0 (per-patient 7,6% vs. 4,8%, p = 0.491; per-area 3,1% vs. 2,1%, p = 0.555), while wtKRAS R1par had less LR compared to mKRAS R1par (per-patient 18,3% vs 25,4%, p = 0.404; per-area 9,9% vs 19,5%, p = 0.048). Inversely, LR was increased in wtKRAS R1vasc compared to mKRAS R1vasc (per-patient 14,6% vs 2%, p = 0.043; per-area 13,3% vs 1,9%, p = 0.046).ConclusionKRAS status does not impact LR risk in R0 resection. Inversely, R1vasc vs R1par LR risk is reduced in mKRAS, and increased in wtKRAS. If confirmed these results are of note.     

Therapeutic potential of trametinib to inhibit the mutagenesis by inactivating the protein kinase pathway in non-small cell lung cancer

Introduction:Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway is known to be involved in the tumorigenesis of cancer cells including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and kinases involved in this pathway are frequently mutated. The development of new targeted therapies in cancer has led to the evaluation of MEK-inhibitors.

Areas covered: This article reviews different studies using trametinib alone, in combination with other targeted therapies or associated with other non-targeted therapies in NSCLC, with a focus on KRAS mutant and BRAF mutant NSCLC.

Expert commentary: Trametinib demonstrated activity in association with a BRAF inhibitor when BRAF was mutated. The combination of trametinib and dabrafenib has been approved for this population of BRAF mutant NSCLC patients. For KRAS mutant NSCLC, the combination of trametinib with chemotherapy has showed promising results and should be further assessed. Several clinical trials are ongoing, assessing trametinib in combination with other targeted therapies. In addition, preclinical studies suggest a synergistic effect of trametinib in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors and such combinations should be studied in clinical trials.     

Inhalation delivery dramatically improves the efficacy of topotecan for the treatment of local and distant lung cancer

Topotecan is potent anti-cancer drug approved for various malignancies but hematopoietic toxicities undermine its wider application and use of its most effective dose. This study aims to improve these limitations through inhalation-delivery. The pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and toxicity of 2–5 times lower inhalation doses of topotecan dry-powder were compared with the standard intravenous (IV) delivery once/twice-a-week. Human-derived EGFR-mutant (H1975), KRAS-mutant (A549), and EGFR/KRAS wild-type (H358) orthotopic and distant lung tumors were evaluated in murine models. Inhalation of 1 mg/kg topotecan significantly improved the half-life and drug exposure (area under the curve, AUC) compared to 5 mg/kg via IV-delivery. AUCs (h*ng/mL) for inhaled/IV topotecan in plasma, lung, liver, and brain were, 831/888, 60,000/1080, 8380/4000, and 297/15, respectively; while the half-life was also greatly increased in these tissues. The average lung tumor burden of H358-derived tumors was reduced from 15.0 g to 8.4 g (44%) in rats treated once-a-week with 2 mg/kg IV and 1.8 g (88%) with 1 mg/kg inhaled topotecan, corroborating previous findings using A549- and H1975-derived orthotopic lung tumors. Importantly, inhaled topotecan showed superior efficacy in suppressing lung tumors at distant sites. The growth of H1975- and H358-derived subcutaneous xenografts were completely arrested and A549-derived tumors were significantly reduced in mice treated twice-a-week with 1 mg/kg inhaled topotecan compared to a minor (H1975 and H358) or no reduction (A549) with twice-a-week 5 mg/kg IV topotecan.     

Metformin Enhances Cisplatin-Induced Apoptosis and Prevents Resistance to Cisplatin in Co-mutated KRAS/LKB1 NSCLC

Introduction

We hypothesized that activating KRAS mutations and inactivation of the liver kinase B1 (LKB1) oncosuppressor can cooperate to sustain NSCLC aggressiveness. We also hypothesized that the growth advantage of KRAS/LKB1 co-mutated tumors could be balanced by higher sensitivity to metabolic stress conditions, such as metformin treatment, thus revealing new strategies to target this aggressive NSCLC subtype.

Cetuximab Combined With Induction Oxaliplatin and Capecitabine,Followed by Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: SWOG 0713

Background

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NCRT) is standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer. Pathologic complete response (pCR) has associated with improved survival. In modern phase III trials of NCRT, pCR ranges from 10% to 20%. Cetuximab improves response in KRAS (KRAS proto-oncogene) wild type (wt) metastatic colorectal cancer. S0713 was designed to assess improvement in pCR with additional use of cetuximab with induction chemotherapy and NCRT for locally advanced, KRAS-wt rectal cancer.