Can Tweets Predict Citations? Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact

Background

Citations in peer-reviewed articles and the impact factor are generally accepted measures of scientific impact. Web 2.0 tools such as Twitter, blogs or social bookmarking tools provide the possibility to construct innovative article-level or journal-level metrics to gauge impact and influence. However, the relationship of the these new metrics to traditional metrics such as citations is not known.

Objective

(1) To explore the feasibility of measuring social impact of and public attention to scholarly articles by analyzing buzz in social media, (2) to explore the dynamics, content, and timing of tweets relative to the publication of a scholarly article, and (3) to explore whether these metrics are sensitive and specific enough to predict highly cited articles.

Methods

Between July 2008 and November 2011, all tweets containing links to articles in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR) were mined. For a subset of 1573 tweets about 55 articles published between issues 3/2009 and 2/2010, different metrics of social media impact were calculated and compared against subsequent citation data from Scopus and Google Scholar 17 to 29 months later. A heuristic to predict the top-cited articles in each issue through tweet metrics was validated.

Results

A total of 4208 tweets cited 286 distinct JMIR articles. The distribution of tweets over the first 30 days after article publication followed a power law (Zipf, Bradford, or Pareto distribution), with most tweets sent on the day when an article was published (1458/3318, 43.94% of all tweets in a 60-day period) or on the following day (528/3318, 15.9%), followed by a rapid decay. The Pearson correlations between tweetations and citations were moderate and statistically significant, with correlation coefficients ranging from .42 to .72 for the log-transformed Google Scholar citations, but were less clear for Scopus citations and rank correlations. A linear multivariate model with time and tweets as significant predictors (P < .001) could explain 27% of the variation of citations. Highly tweeted articles were 11 times more likely to be highly cited than less-tweeted articles (9/12 or 75% of highly tweeted article were highly cited, while only 3/43 or 7% of less-tweeted articles were highly cited; rate ratio 0.75/0.07 = 10.75, 95% confidence interval, 3.4–33.6). Top-cited articles can be predicted from top-tweeted articles with 93% specificity and 75% sensitivity.

Conclusions

Tweets can predict highly cited articles within the first 3 days of article publication. Social media activity either increases citations or reflects the underlying qualities of the article that also predict citations, but the true use of these metrics is to measure the distinct concept of social impact. Social impact measures based on tweets are proposed to complement traditional citation metrics. The proposed twimpact factor may be a useful and timely metric to measure uptake of research findings and to filter research findings resonating with the public in real time.     

浅析朱仁康治疗脂溢性皮炎用药经验

[目的]基于数据挖掘分析朱仁康老中医治疗脂溢性皮炎(seborrheic dermatitis,SD)的用药经验.[方法]采用中国中医科学院中医药信息研究所研发的"古今医案云平台V1.4",基于书稿及2019年7月30日前发表的文献,筛选朱老治疗SD的医案,归纳用药频次、核心方药,通过药物性味归经分析、关联规则分析、聚...     

建设世界一流期刊背景下军队医学期刊的特色化发展之路——以《解放军医学杂志》为例

【目的】 探索建设世界一流期刊背景下军队医学期刊的特色化发展之路,为同类期刊提供借鉴。【方法】 以《解放军医学杂志》(以下简称《解医》)的具体实践为例,通过客观分析目前军队医学期刊面临的困境以及《解医》内外部环境,结合自身定位、学科特点以及办刊优势等因素,提出《解医》在发挥学术引领作用基础之上的特色化发展策略。【结果】 在建设世界一流期刊的大背景下,确立“学术引领,特色为王”的“三个核心出版”建设模式,即围绕内容创新,倡导以专家为核心的领航栏目建设、以社会效益为核心的应急出版建设以及以学术质量为核心的军事医学主题出版建设。通过充分发挥期刊学术引领作用、打造品牌特色和寻求差异化发展之路,《解医》影响力获得稳步提升。【结论】 军队医学期刊应找准定位,扬长避短,走差异化特色化办刊之路,实现可持续发展,进一步实现建设世界一流期刊的目标。