Vertebroplasty and Kyphoplasty in Spinal Trauma

Abstract Kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty have become recognized procedures for the treatment of vertebral fractures, especially in patients with osteoporosis. In most cases of osteoporotic spinal vertebral fracture in elderly patients, polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cement is used to fill the defect and stabilize the vertebral body. The techniques of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty differ in the possibility of realignment and reconstruction of the vertebral body and spinal column. Long-term results in terms of integration of the cement and bioreactivity of the vertebral body are still lacking; so, these procedures are still no options in the treatment of younger patients. Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty show different success in the management of fresh traumatic spine fractures. The acute traumatic vertebral fracture has to be classified sensitively, to find the right indication for cement augmentation. Mild acute compression fractures can be treated by vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty, severe compression and burst fractures by combination of internal fixation and kyphoplasty. The indications for use of biological or osteoinductive cement in spinal fracture management must still be regarded as restricted owing to the lack of basic biomechanical research data. Such cement should not be used except in clinical studies.     

颈动脉加压注射复方维脑路通合剂治疗脑梗死180例临床分析

本科自 2 0 0 0年 6月以来 ,采用颈动脉加压注射复方维脑路通合剂治疗脑梗死 180例 ,并与静脉给药组相比较 ,现总结如下。1　资料与方法1.1　临床资料　治疗组 180例 ,男 117例 ,女 6 3例 ,年龄 37岁～ 76岁 ,平均年龄 5 7.2 0岁。均为颈内动脉系统脑梗死。其中大面积脑梗死 4例 ,脑梗死 85例 ,腔隙性脑梗死 91例。大面积脑梗死组 4例 ,其梗死灶涉及 2个脑叶或以上 ,均无意识障碍及脑疝者 ,在发病 10d后即脑水肿高峰期后开始颈动脉加压注射。治疗组病例选择除下列禁忌 :①严重高血压病(血压≥ 2 6 .6 / 16kPa) ;②脑出血、出血性梗死 ;③严…     

医院档案综合管理的意义及对策

对我国医院目前档案管理的现状,档案信息资源在医院现代化建设中的作用以及实行医院档案综合管理的重要意义及对策进行了全面系统地分析,强调了实现医院档案规范化、科学化和现代化管理的重要性和紧迫性。     

医疗设备管理帐目、资产卡组合的Excel实现

对医疗设备管理帐目、资产卡基本管理模式进行分析和Excel功能比较优选，运用Excel组合功能满足业务流程需要，解决帐、卡分立的现象，达到及时、全面、直观地掌握医疗设备信息的目的。     

医院信息系统变更的主要原因及对策

目的本文以医院信息系统（hispitalinformation system，HIS）系统实施的一般规律为例，讨论了HIS系统实施的一般规律，深入探讨了范围变更产生的原因、接受依据以及管理技术，对于HIS系统实施中最常发生的范围变更管理提出了对策，以使医院业务与HIS软件系统有机会结合在一起，真正实现医院业务信息化的目标。方法文章认为，系统范围变更管理应贯穿于系统实施过程的始终，每一项需求变更都应分析其产生的原因、对医院业务的影响和对系统实施的影响，以确定是否接受范围变更。结果当决定接受或拒绝范围变更申请时，信息科都应与提供产品公司的实施工程师沟通。结论在范围变更管理中，要充分使用好文档模板，并制定出规范的范围变更管理流程，以提高范围变更管理效率。     

合并心律失常的心力衰竭56例治疗评价

目的探讨心力衰竭并发心律失常的发病规律及治疗方法。方法回顾性分析了93例慢性心力衰竭病人的临床资料，包括临床特点、诊断治疗方法以及预后。结果心律失常发生率为60．2％，以室性早搏发生率最高32．1％，其次是房性早搏26．8％，心房纤颤21．4％，其他19．7％，经治疗有效71例，总有效率76．3％。结论纠正心功能不全是治疗的关键，应根据具体情况选择性地应用抗心律失常药。     

规范临床新技术、新项目管理的做法与体会

探讨安徽省立医院规范临床新技术、新项目管理的做法:一是明确新技术、新项目的管理范畴和管理部门;二是抓好申报与管理的三个环节;三是管理与激励并重,实现两个效益稳步增长.并结合三年来的实践谈自身体会.     

Effects of self-management training in Type 2 diabetes: a randomized, prospective trial.

AIMS: The efficacy of three education programmes for Type 2 diabetic patients was tested in a randomized trial. A didactic-oriented training programme (treatment A) was compared with a self-management-oriented programme delivered in group sessions (treatment B). The latter programme was compared with a more individualized approach (treatment C). METHODS: One hundred and eighty-one Type 2 diabetic patients (age 55.6 +/- 6.3 years, diabetes duration 6.6 +/- 6.2 years, HbA(1c) 7.8 +/- 1.6%, female 49.7%) took part. Efficacy was assessed 3 months (t1) after baseline (t0) and at a follow-up 15 months (t2) after baseline. RESULTS: The fall in HbA(1c) in treatment B at t1 was sustained at t2 (t0 8.1 +/- 1.8%, t1 7.3 +/- 1.7%, t2 7.4 +/- 1.9%). In treatment A, HbA(1c) was unchanged throughout (t0 7.6 +/- 1.5%, t1 7.5 +/- 1.3%, t2 7.7 +/- 1.7%; treatment A vs. treatment B; P < 0.05). With the more individualized approach of treatment C, there was a fall in HbA(1c) at t1, but this was not sustained at t2 (t0 7.8 +/- 1.6%, t1 7.1 +/- 1.3%, t2 7.6 +/- 1.6%; treatment B vs. treatment C; P = 0.73). There were also significant benefits in treatment B subjects compared with treatment A in further medical (body mass index and fasting blood glucose), psychological (control, irritability and hunger dependency of eating behaviour, and trait anxiety) and behavioural (exercise) variables. There were no significant benefits of the more individualized treatment C compared with group treatment B. No significant differences were found regarding triglyceride levels, high-density lipoprotein, diabetes-related knowledge, negative well-being, urine or blood glucose levels or foot care. CONCLUSION: Self-management training had a significantly higher medium-term efficacy than didactic diabetes education. The group sessions were more effective than a more individualized approach.