Superior efficacy of fesoterodine over tolterodine extended release with rapid onset: a prospective,head‐to‐head,placebo‐controlled trial

Study Type – Therapy (RCT)
Level of Evidence 1b What’s known on the subject? and What does the study add? A previous trial found greater efficacy with the maximum available dose of fesoterodine 8 mg compared with the maximum available dose of tolterodine ER 4 mg and placebo for improving overactive bladder symptoms, and patient‐reported outcomes were demonstrated by a recent placebo‐controlled, head‐to‐head trial. The results of this trial, the largest to date to compare antimuscarinic efficacy, confirms the superior efficacy of fesoterodine 8 mg over tolterodine ER 4 mg for the treatment of OAB symptoms, and further emphasize the clinical advantage of the availability of an additional 8‐mg dose over single‐dose tolterodine ER 4 mg.

OBJECTIVE

? To show the superior efficacy of fesoterodine over tolterodine extended release (ER) in a placebo‐controlled overactive bladder (OAB) trial with predefined treatment comparisons for both diary measures and patient‐reported outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

? In this 12‐week, double‐blind, double‐dummy trial, subjects reporting >1 urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) episode and ≥8 micturitions per 24 h at baseline were randomized to fesoterodine (4 mg for 1 week, 8 mg for 11 weeks), tolterodine ER 4 mg, or placebo. ? Subjects completed 3‐day bladder diaries, the Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) and the Urgency Perception Scale (UPS) at baseline and weeks 1, 4 and 12 and the OAB Questionnaire at baseline and week 12.

RESULTS

? A total of 2417 subjects were randomized. At week 12, fesoterodine 8 mg showed superiority over tolterodine ER 4 mg and placebo on UUI episodes (primary endpoint), micturitions, urgency and most other diary endpoints, and on the PPBC, UPS and all OAB Questionnaire scales and domains (all P < 0.05). ? Superiority of fesoterodine 8 mg over tolterodine ER 4 mg was seen as early as week 4 (3 weeks after escalation to fesoterodine 8 mg). At week 1, fesoterodine 4 mg was superior to placebo on most diary variables, the PPBC and the UPS (all P < 0.05). Dry mouth and constipation rates were 28% and 4% with fesoterodine, 13% and 3% with tolterodine ER, and 5% and 2% with placebo. ? Discontinuation rates as a result of adverse events were 5%, 3% and 2% for fesoterodine, tolterodine ER and placebo, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

? In this randomized study, which is the largest to compare antimuscarinic efficacy performed to date, fesoterodine 8 mg was superior to tolterodine ER 4 mg for UUI episodes, micturitions and urgency episodes, as well as for self‐reported patient assessments of bladder‐related problems, urgency, symptom bother and health‐related quality of life. ? The superiority of fesoterodine 8 mg over tolterodine ER 4 mg was observed as early as 3 weeks after escalation from fesoterodine 4 mg for most outcomes. These data may have important implications for the clinical management of OAB patients previously treated with tolterodine ER.     

Efficacy and tolerability of tolterodine extended-release in continent patients with overactive bladder and nocturia

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and tolerability of tolterodine extended-release (ER) in continent patients with overactive bladder (OAB) and nocturia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A post hoc analysis was conducted of data from a 12-week, double-blind study of 850 patients randomized to tolterodine ER (4 mg once daily) or placebo, taken within 4 h of going to bed. Patients with a mean of > or = 8 voids/24 h were enrolled, including a mean of > or = 2.5 voids/night. Patients completed 7-day voiding diaries, and for each void an urgency rating was assessed using a 5-point scale (1, none; 5, urgency incontinence); 24-h voids were categorized by urgency rating: total (1-5), non-OAB (1-2), OAB (3-4), and severe OAB (4-5) voids. All adverse events were recorded. RESULTS: The post hoc analysis included 513 patients (243 placebo; 270 tolterodine ER; 58% men) who were continent at baseline; 47% of 24-h voids were classed as non-OAB, and 12% as severe OAB. After 12 weeks of treatment, tolterodine ER significantly reduced mean urgency rating and 24-h OAB, severe OAB, and total voids vs placebo. Tolterodine ER did not affect normal, non-OAB voids, and there were no significant adverse events related to voiding. Other than dry mouth (tolterodine ER, 9% vs placebo, 2%), all the adverse events were reported in <3% of patients; <2% of patients receiving tolterodine ER withdrew because of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: In continent patients with OAB, tolterodine ER significantly improved urgency rating and reduced 24-h OAB, severe OAB, and total voids, suggesting that it is an effective and well-tolerated treatment option for this subpopulation. More studies are needed to better understand the clinical efficacy of tolterodine ER in this under evaluated group of OAB patients without incontinence.     

Efficacy and tolerability of tolterodine extended-release in men with overactive bladder and urgency urinary incontinence

A group of authors from the USA evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of tolterodine extended-release on objective and subjective endpoints in men with an overactive bladder. They found that it significantly reduced incontinent episodes and improved patient perception of treatment benefit in men with an overactive bladder OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of tolterodine extended-release (ER) on objective and subjective endpoints in men with overactive bladder (OAB) and urgency urinary incontinence (UI). PATIENTS AND METHODS This was a post hoc analysis of data collected from men with OAB enrolled in a 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of tolterodine ER (4 mg once daily; tolterodine ER registration trial) and included men with urinary frequency (> or =8 micturitions/24 h) and urgency UI (> or =5 episodes/week). UI episodes were assessed using 7-day bladder diaries. Patient perception of treatment benefit was evaluated after 12 weeks. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded throughout the study. RESULTS: In all, 163 men with OAB (placebo, 86; tolterodine ER, 77; mean age 65 years) were evaluated. Baseline demographics and clinical characteristics were similar for the two treatment groups. Compared with placebo, tolterodine ER significantly reduced weekly UI episodes (median % change, -71% vs - 40%, P < 0.05; mean numeric change, - 11.9 vs -5.9, P = 0.02). Men receiving tolterodine ER had fewer micturitions/24 h, but this was not a significant difference from placebo (median % change, -12% vs - 4%, P = 0.22). Significantly more men treated with tolterodine-ER (63%) than placebo-treated men (46%) reported a benefit of treatment after 12 weeks (P = 0.04). The most commonly reported AEs associated with tolterodine-ER vs placebo were dry mouth (16% vs 7%), constipation (4% vs 9%), dyspepsia (4% vs 1%), dizziness (5% vs 1%), and somnolence (3% vs 1%). One of the men receiving tolterodine ER had symptoms suggestive of urinary retention that led to his withdrawal from the study. None of the men had acute urinary retention requiring catheterization. CONCLUSION: In men with OAB and urgency UI, tolterodine ER was well tolerated and significantly reduced episodes of urgency UI, and improved patient perception of treatment benefit.     

生物反馈／电刺激联合托特罗定治疗女性膀胱过度活动症

目的：评价生物反馈／电刺激联合托特罗定治疗女性膀胱过度活动症（OAB）的疗效。方法：60例女性OAB患者采用生物反馈／电刺激（20天）联合口服托特罗定（4周）进行治疗,结束后3个月评价疗效并追踪观察。结果：60例女性OAB患者中,治愈32例（53．3％）,有效22例（36．7％）,无效6例（10．0％）,总有效率达90％。54例获6个月追踪观察,无复发。结论：生物反馈／电刺激联合托特罗定是治疗女性OAB的一种有效方法。     

Clinical efficacy and tolerability of extended-release tolterodine and immediate-release oxybutynin in Japanese and Korean patients with an overactive bladder: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: To compare extended-release (ER) tolterodine and immediate-release (IR) oxybutynin with placebo in Japanese and Korean patients with an overactive bladder (OAB). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Men and women aged >or= 20 years with symptoms of urinary urgency, urinary frequency (>or= 8 micturitions/24 h), urge incontinence (>or= 5 episodes/week) and symptoms of OAB for >or= 6 months were randomized to double-blind treatment with tolterodine ER 4 mg once daily, oxybutynin IR 3 mg three times daily or placebo for 12 weeks. Efficacy assessments included changes from baseline in numbers of incontinence episodes per week, voids/24 h and mean volume voided/void. Patient perceptions of bladder condition, urgency and treatment benefit were also assessed. RESULTS: In all, 608 patients were randomized to treatment with tolterodine (240), oxybutynin (246) or placebo (122). More patients prematurely withdrew on oxybutynin (23%) than with tolterodine (10.4%) or placebo (16.4%). After 12 weeks of treatment, the median number of incontinence episodes/week was reduced significantly more in the tolterodine (79%; P= 0.0027) and oxybutynin groups (76.5%; P= 0.0168) than on placebo (46.4%). There were also significantly greater improvements in the number of voids/24 h and volume voided/void with tolterodine and oxybutynin than with placebo. More patients in the tolterodine and oxybutynin than in the placebo groups reported improvements in perceived bladder condition, ability to hold urine and treatment benefit. Patients treated with oxybutynin reported more adverse events than those treated with tolterodine or placebo. Dry mouth was significantly more common with oxybutynin than with tolterodine (53.7% vs. 33.5%; P < 0.001), and occurred in 9.8% of placebo patients. CONCLUSION: Tolterodine ER has similar efficacy but is better tolerated than oxybutynin IR in Japanese and Korean patients with OAB.     

Persistence with antimuscarinic therapy in patients with overactive bladder

Overactive bladder (OAB) is a chronic condition, which impacts patients' health and quality of life. The primary symptoms of OAB are distressing and may interfere with work, psychosocial and sexual functioning. OAB also is associated with increased risk of urinary tract infections, fractures from falls, skin infections and depression. Patient's concerns about the effects of incontinence on lifestyle highlight the need to restore continence. The mainstay of treatment is antimuscarinic drug therapy, which may often produce only modest reductions in OAB symptoms and may be accompanied by bothersome adverse effects, leading to poor adherence to prescribed medications. Successful treatment of OAB depends on persistence with the prescribed medication, and efficacy and tolerability are key influencers of persistence. New antimuscarinic agents are now available for treating OAB that significantly improve symptoms of incontinence, urgency and frequency with few adverse effects. An improved efficacy and tolerability profile should result in greater patient satisfaction and persistence with therapy during long-term therapy.     

Clinical and urodynamic effects of tolterodine in women with an overactive bladder

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to compare the changes in urinary symptoms and urodynamic parameters after administration of tolterodine in women with an overactive bladder (OAB).Materials and MethodsThirty-eight women diagnosed with OAB and treated with tolterodine were reviewed. Urinalysis, pelvic examination, 3-day bladder diary, urodynamic study, and a personal interview to identify urinary symptoms prior to and 3 months after treatment were recorded and interpreted.ResultsMost of our patients were menopausal (76.3%; mean age 55.7 years) and multiparous (mean parity 3.3) women. Urinary symptoms such as urinary frequency, urgency, urge incontinence, and nocturia were decreased significantly (p < 0.05). All urodynamic parameters did not change significantly except for the maximum cystometric capacity (p < 0.05), showing a significant increase after 3 months of medication.ConclusionsTolterodine, at a recommended dose, improves the symptoms of OAB syndrome without causing urine retention, as proved by the changes of urodynamic parameters.