Objective: To examine patient safety culture in Dutch out-of-hours primary care using the safety attitudes questionnaire (SAQ) which includes five factors: teamwork climate, safety climate, job satisfaction, perceptions of management and communication openness.Design: Cross-sectional observational study using an anonymous web-survey. Setting Sixteen out-of-hours general practitioner (GP) cooperatives and two call centers in the Netherlands. Subjects Primary healthcare providers in out-of-hours services. Main outcome measures Mean scores on patient safety culture factors; association between patient safety culture and profession, gender, age, and working experience.Results: Overall response rate was 43%. A total of 784 respondents were included; mainly GPs (N?=?470) and triage nurses (N?=?189). The healthcare providers were most positive about teamwork climate and job satisfaction, and less about communication openness and safety climate. The largest variation between clinics was found on safety climate; the lowest on teamwork climate. Triage nurses scored significantly higher than GPs on each of the five patient safety factors. Older healthcare providers scored significantly higher than younger on safety climate and perceptions of management. More working experience was positively related to higher teamwork climate and communication openness. Gender was not associated with any of the patient safety factors.Conclusions: Our study showed that healthcare providers perceive patient safety culture in Dutch GP cooperatives positively, but there are differences related to the respondents’ profession, age and working experience. Recommendations for future studies are to examine reasons for these differences, to examine the effects of interventions to improve safety culture and to make international comparisons of safety culture.
Key Points
Creating a positive patient safety culture is assumed to be a prerequisite for quality and safety. We found that:
??healthcare providers in Dutch GP cooperatives perceive patient safety culture positively;
??triage nurses scored higher than GPs, and older and more experienced healthcare professionals scored higher than younger and less experienced professionals – on several patient safety culture factors; and
??within the GP cooperatives, safety climate and openness of communication had the largest potential for improvement.
Objective. Despite major trials showing the opposite, one of three small randomized trials conducted outside the US has raised questions about whether heparin alone is a viable antithrombotic strategy for primary percutaneous coronary interventions (PPCI). We determined the frequency and in-hospital outcomes of anticoagulation strategies in patients undergoing PPCI. Methods. We analyzed records from 2008 through 2013 in the Premier Research Database of patients hospitalized with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing PPCI. Patients were categorized into one of four anticoagulation strategies: bivalirudin alone, bivalirudin plus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPI), unfractionated or low-molecular-weight heparin alone or heparin plus GPI. In-hospital clinical outcomes were compared between treatment groups after propensity score matching. Results. Among 114,134 eligible STEMI patients, heparin alone was the least frequent anticoagulation strategy, used in 14.4% to 18.1% of cases per year. Bivalirudin alone nearly tripled during the study period, from 12.7% to 37.8% and surpassed that of heparin plus GPI by 2013. Bivalirudin alone performed better than heparin alone for mortality (4.7% vs 5.3%, p = 0.010), clinically apparent bleeding (5.7% vs 6.7%, p < 0.001), transfusion rates (4.1% vs 4.8%, p = 0.003) and mean length of stay (4.1 vs 4.2 days, p < 0.001). The in-hospital death rate was lower with heparin plus GPI than with heparin alone (4.9% vs 5.9%, p < 0.001), but clinically apparent bleeding was higher in heparin plus GPI than in heparin alone (9.4% vs 7.1%, p < 0.001). Conclusion: In patients hospitalized for STEMI undergoing PPCI, heparin alone is not commonly used and is inferior to bivalirudin for mortality, bleeding and length of stay outcomes. Heparin is also inferior to heparin plus GPI for ischemic protection but associated with less bleeding. 相似文献
AIM:To compare the dynamic changes of anterior segment parameters especially iris morphology induced by pharmacologic mydriasis between angle closure suspects and normal controls.METHODS:The study group comprised 19 eyes of 19 angle closure suspects and 19 eyes of 19 age- and sex-matched normal open-angle eyes. Pentacam and optical coherence tomography measurements before and 30min after instillation of compound tropicamide eye drop were performed and compared. Biometric evaluations of iris tomography and anterior chamber angle were estimated by a customized image-processing software.RESULTS:Baseline axial length, iris cross sectional area and volume did not differ significantly between angle closure suspects and normal controls. Angle closure suspects had smaller pupil size, narrower anterior segment dimension and axial length, thinner iris with greater curve in comparison with normal controls. Pharmacologic mydriasis led to significant increments in iris thickness at 750 μm, anterior chamber depth and volume, whereas significant decrements in iris curve, cross sectional area and volume in both groups. Angle opening distance at 500 μm was increased significantly in normal controls (from 0.465±0.115 mm to 0.539±0.167 mm, P=0.009), but not in angle closure suspects (from 0.125±0.100 mm to 0.145±0.131 mm, P=0.326). Iris volume change per millimeter of pupil dilation (△IV/△PD) decreased significantly less in angle closure suspects than normal controls (-2.47±1.33 mm2vs -3.63±1.58 mm2, P=0.019). Linear regression analysis showed that the change of angle opening distance at 500 μm was associated most with the change of central anterior chamber depth (β=0.841, P=0.002) and △IV/△PD (β=0.028, P=0.002), followed by gender (β=0.062, P=0.032).CONCLUSION:Smaller iris volume decrement per millimeter of pupil dilation is related significantly with the less anterior angle opening in angle closure suspects after pharmacologic mydriasis. Dynamic iris change may be as a prospective indicator of iris compressibility and angle closure glaucoma. 相似文献
Within the opioid family of receptors, δ (DOPrs) and μ opioid receptors (MOPrs) are typical GPCRs that activate canonical second-messenger signalling cascades to influence diverse cellular functions in neuronal and non-neuronal cell types. These receptors activate well-known pathways to influence ion channel function and pathways such as the map kinase cascade, AC and PI3K. In addition new information regarding opioid receptor-interacting proteins, downstream signalling pathways and resultant functional effects has recently come to light. In this review, we will examine these novel findings focusing on the DOPr and, in doing so, will contrast and compare DOPrs with MOPrs in terms of differences and similarities in function, signalling pathways, distribution and interactions. We will also discuss and clarify issues that have recently surfaced regarding the expression and function of DOPrs in different cell types and analgesia.