Epicardial Versus Endocardial Pacemakers in the Pediatric Population: A Comparative Inquiry

Background: Most children in need of cardiac pacemakers remain dependent on the function of the permanent from childhood to adulthood. We sought to evaluate and compare the function between epicardial and endocardial pacemakers in pediatric groups with different conditions. Methods: Between 2012 and 2018, this single-canter study evaluated 44 pediatric patients with indications for epicardial or endocardial pacemakers. Results: The 2 groups, at a median age of 5 (0.1–16) years, were compared concerning the characteristics of the leads used (n = 80: bipolar, unipolar, steroid-eluting, and non–steroid-eluting), survival data, and complications. The reason for pacemaker implantation was congenital complete heart block in 11 (25%) cases and postoperative heart block in 33 (75%) cases. The commonest congenital heart disease accompanied by postoperative block was the ventricular septal defect. In the endocardial lead group, the mean ventricular pacing threshold immediately after the implantation and during the follow-up was less than that in the epicardial lead group (0.75 vs. 0.81 V; P = 0.01 and 0.8 vs. 2.4 V; P = 0.001). During the follow-up, the mean battery longevity was better in the endocardial group (last visit: 6.7 endocardial vs. 3.3 years epicardial). Lead failure was commoner in the epicardial pacemaker, and chronic high-pacing threshold pattern was seen in 14 patients in this group. After 3 years, freedom from lead failure was 94% and 63% in the endocardial and epicardial leads. Conclusions: Pacemakers with endocardial bipolar steroid-eluting leads showed better lead characteristics regarding survival and battery longevity than epicardial pacemakers without these lead characteristics. An appropriate pacemaker type should be selected based on the patient’s condition.     

Termination of desynchronization rhythm and restoration of cardiac resynchronization by left‐sided ventricular premature complexes

Cardiac resynchronization devices that sense left ventricular (LV) activity and can detect interruptions of resynchronization therapy are able to record all forms of desynchronization rhythms, which are triggered by misalignment of LV timing cycles. We report five cases of this desynchronization rhythm that were terminated by isolated left‐sided ventricular premature complexes (LVPC) undetected by the right ventricular (RV) channel and unaccompanied by changes in the duration of the RV pacing cycles. In three cases, the devices did not even sense the LVPCs responsible for desynchronization termination. The restoration of resynchronization in our cases is in contrast to the traditional termination mode that is invariably associated with changes in the duration of the RV cycles.     

Guidewire pacing during transcatheter aortic valve implantation in a patient with complex congenital heart disease

We present a case of temporary guidewire pacing in a patient with Fontan anatomy during transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Temporary pacing was successfully achieved utilizing this method without complications. There is an increasing population of patients with complex congenital heart disease and expanding variety of transcatheter interventions. Due to limitations in vascular access and surgical anatomies, guidewire pacing may have a wide array of potential applications in pediatrics and the congenital heart disease population.     

Effect of Bachmann's bundle pacing on atrial fibrillation: electrophysiologic assessment

BACKGROUND: It has recently been reported that simultaneous multisite atrial pacing, Bachmann's bundle (BB) pacing, and coronary sinus (CS) pacing are useful for preventing the induction of atrial fibrillation (AF). HYPOTHESIS: We investigated whether a simple pacing approach via BB could reduce the induction of AF by extrastimuli (S2) from the right atrial appendage (RAA). METHODS: Programmed electrical stimulation was performed from the RAA and the area of BB at the superior aspect of the atrial septum, and bipolar recordings were obtained from the RAA, BB, and CS in 14 patients. RESULTS: In five patients, AF was induced with critically timed RAA-S2 delivered during RAA pacing. However, AF was not induced in any patient when RAA-S2 was delivered during BB pacing. The duration of the P wave during BB pacing was significantly shorter than that during RAA pacing and sinus rhythm (BB 80 +/- 16 ms vs. RAA 106 +/- 36 ms vs. sinus rhythm 100 +/- 24 ms, p < 0.05). The intra-atrial conduction time to the distal coronary sinus (CSd) caused by early S2 at the RAA was significantly reduced by BB pacing (BB 114 +/- 22 ms vs. RAA 157 +/- 35 ms, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Bachmann's bundle pacing reduces atrial conduction time caused by RAA-S2 and may be useful for preventing the induction of AF.     

Serial electrophysiologic studies after single chamber atrial pacemaker implantation in patients with symptomatic sinus node dysfunction

After single chamber atrial pacemaker implantation, serial electrophysiologicstudies were performed noninvasively at intervals of 3 monthsover a total period of 3 years in 24 patients with symptomaticsinus node dysfunction. All patients underwent invasive electrophysiologicstudies before pacemaker implantation and demonstrated intactanterograde AV conduction. Patients were divided into 2 groupsgroup I did not require antiarrhythmic drugs during follow-upwhereas group 2 received antiarrhythmic drugs. In group 1(11 patients) the atrial paced heart rate producingAV Wenckebach phenomenon (AVWHR) remained stable during a meanfollow-up of 22±10 months, with a variability not exceeding10 beats min^–1 with respect to the initial AVWHR obtainedduring preoperative electrophysiologic study. In group 2 (13patients) with a mean follow-up of 15±8 months a meandecrease of AVWHR of 19.2±17.5 beats min^–1 waspresent between AVWHR before and 3 months after initiation oforal antiarrhythmic drugs (P<0.01) During chronic (>3months) antiarrhythmic drug therapy the variability of the AVWHRnever exceeded 10 beats min^–1 with respect to the AVWHRobtained 3 months after the initiation of oral drug therapy. Deterioration of anterograde AV conduction during long-termfollow-up of patients with symptomatic sinus node dysfunctionand intact anterograde AV conduction at the time of pacemakerimplantation is a consequence of orally taken antiarrhythmicdrugs, rather than a consequence of degeneration of the AV conductingsystem.