Monomethylarsonous acid inhibited endogenous cholesterol biosynthesis in human skin fibroblasts

Human exposure to arsenic in drinking water is a widespread public health concern, and such exposure is known to be associated with many human diseases. The detailed molecular mechanisms about how arsenic species contribute to the adverse human health effects, however, remain incompletely understood. Monomethylarsonous acid [MMA(III)] is a highly toxic and stable metabolite of inorganic arsenic. To exploit the mechanisms through which MMA(III) exerts its cytotoxic effect, we adopted a quantitative proteomic approach, by coupling stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture (SILAC) with LC-MS/MS analysis, to examine the variation in the entire proteome of GM00637 human skin fibroblasts following acute MMA(III) exposure. Among the ~ 6500 unique proteins quantified, ~ 300 displayed significant changes in expression after exposure with 2 μM MMA(III) for 24 h. Subsequent analysis revealed the perturbation of de novo cholesterol biosynthesis, selenoprotein synthesis and Nrf2 pathways evoked by MMA(III) exposure. Particularly, MMA(III) treatment resulted in considerable down-regulation of several enzymes involved in cholesterol biosynthesis. In addition, real-time PCR analysis showed reduced mRNA levels of select genes in this pathway. Furthermore, MMA(III) exposure contributed to a distinct decline in cellular cholesterol content and significant growth inhibition of multiple cell lines, both of which could be restored by supplementation of cholesterol to the culture media. Collectively, the present study demonstrated that the cytotoxicity of MMA(III) may arise, at least in part, from the down-regulation of cholesterol biosynthesis enzymes and the resultant decrease of cellular cholesterol content.     

Mitigating Future Respiratory Virus Pandemics: New Threats and Approaches to Consider

Despite many recent efforts to predict and control emerging infectious disease threats to humans, we failed to anticipate the zoonotic viruses which led to pandemics in 2009 and 2020. The morbidity, mortality, and economic costs of these pandemics have been staggering. We desperately need a more targeted, cost-efficient, and sustainable strategy to detect and mitigate future zoonotic respiratory virus threats. Evidence suggests that the transition from an animal virus to a human pathogen is incremental and requires a considerable number of spillover events and considerable time before a pandemic variant emerges. This evolutionary view argues for the refocusing of public health resources on novel respiratory virus surveillance at human–animal interfaces in geographical hotspots for emerging infectious diseases. Where human–animal interface surveillance is not possible, a secondary high-yield, cost-efficient strategy is to conduct novel respiratory virus surveillance among pneumonia patients in these same hotspots. When novel pathogens are discovered, they must be quickly assessed for their human risk and, if indicated, mitigation strategies initiated. In this review, we discuss the most common respiratory virus threats, current efforts at early emerging pathogen detection, and propose and defend new molecular pathogen discovery strategies with the goal of preempting future pandemics.     

Virulence‐targeted Antibacterials: Concept,Promise, and Susceptibility to Resistance Mechanisms

In view of the relentless increase in antibiotic resistance in human pathogens, efforts are needed to safeguard our future therapeutic options against infectious diseases. In addition to regulatory changes in our antibiotic use, this will have to include the development of new therapeutic compounds. One area that has received growing attention in recent years is the possibility to treat or prevent infections by targeting the virulence mechanisms that render bacteria pathogenic. Antivirulence targets include bacterial adherence, secretion of toxic effector molecules, bacterial persistence through biofilm formation, quorum sensing and immune evasion. Effective small‐molecule compounds have already been identified that suppress such processes. In this review, we discuss the susceptibility of such compounds to the development of resistance, by comparison with known resistance mechanisms observed for classical bacteriostatic or bacteriolytic antibiotics, and by review of available experimental case studies. Unfortunately, appearance of resistance mechanisms has already been demonstrated for some, showing that the quest of new, lasting drugs remains complicated.     

Computer-Aided Drug Discovery Approach Finds Calcium Sensitizer of Cardiac Troponin

In the fight against heart failure, therapeutics that have the ability to increase the contractile power of the heart are urgently needed. One possible route of action to improve heart contractile power is increasing the calcium sensitivity of the thin filament. From a pharmaceutical standpoint, calcium sensitizers have the distinct advantage of not altering cardiomyocyte calcium levels and thus have lower potential for side-effects. Small chemical molecules have been shown to bind to the interface between cTnC and the cTnI switch peptide and exhibit calcium-sensitizing properties, possibly by stabilizing cTnC in an open conformation. Building on existing structural data of a known calcium sensitizer bound to cardiac troponin, we combined computational structure-based virtual screening drug discovery methods and solution NMR titration assays to identify a novel calcium sensitizer 4-(4-(2,5-dimethylphenyl)-1-piperazinyl)-3-pyridinamine (NSC147866) which binds to cTnC and the cTnC-cTnI_147–163 complex. Its presence increases the affinity of switch peptide to cTnC by approximately a factor of two. This action is comparable to that of known levosimendan analogues.     

The Unique Binding Mode of Laulimalide to Two Tubulin Protofilaments

Laulimalide, a cancer chemotherapeutic in preclinical development, has a unique binding site located on two adjacent β‐tubulin units between tubulin protofilaments of a microtubule. Our extended protein model more accurately mimics the microtubule environment, and together with a 135 ns molecular dynamics simulation, identifies a new binding mode for laulimalide, which differs from the modes presented in work using smaller protein models. The new laulimalide–residue interactions that are computationally revealed explain the contacts observed via independent mass shift perturbation experiments. The inclusion of explicit solvent shows that many laulimalide–tubulin interactions are water mediated. The new contacts between the drug and the microtubule structure not only improve our understanding of laulimalide binding but also will be essential for efficient derivatization and optimization of this prospective cancer chemotherapy agent. Observed changes in secondary protein structure implicate the S7–H9 loop (M–loop) and H1′–S2 loop in the mechanism by which laulimalide stabilizes microtubules to exert its cytotoxic effects.     

Back to the Future with Phenotypic Screening

相似文献   

Taxodione and arenarone inhibit farnesyl diphosphate synthase by binding to the isopentenyl diphosphate site

We used in silico methods to screen a library of 1,013 compounds for possible binding to the allosteric site in farnesyl diphosphate synthase (FPPS). Two of the 50 predicted hits had activity against either human FPPS (HsFPPS) or Trypanosoma brucei FPPS (TbFPPS), the most active being the quinone methide celastrol (IC₅₀ versus TbFPPS ∼20 µM). Two rounds of similarity searching and activity testing then resulted in three leads that were active against HsFPPS with IC₅₀ values in the range of ∼1–3 µM (as compared with ∼0.5 µM for the bisphosphonate inhibitor, zoledronate). The three leads were the quinone methides taxodone and taxodione and the quinone arenarone, compounds with known antibacterial and/or antitumor activity. We then obtained X-ray crystal structures of HsFPPS with taxodione+zoledronate, arenarone+zoledronate, and taxodione alone. In the zoledronate-containing structures, taxodione and arenarone bound solely to the homoallylic (isopentenyl diphosphate, IPP) site, not to the allosteric site, whereas zoledronate bound via Mg²⁺ to the same site as seen in other bisphosphonate-containing structures. In the taxodione-alone structure, one taxodione bound to the same site as seen in the taxodione+zoledronate structure, but the second located to a more surface-exposed site. In differential scanning calorimetry experiments, taxodione and arenarone broadened the native-to-unfolded thermal transition (T_m), quite different to the large increases in ΔT_m seen with biphosphonate inhibitors. The results identify new classes of FPPS inhibitors, diterpenoids and sesquiterpenoids, that bind to the IPP site and may be of interest as anticancer and antiinfective drug leads.Farnesyl diphosphate synthase (FPPS) catalyzes the condensation of isopentenyl diphosphate (IPP; compound 1 in Fig. 1) with dimethylallyl diphosphate (DMAPP; compound 2 in Fig. 1) to form the C₁₀ isoprenoid geranyl diphosphate (GPP; compound 3 in Fig. 1), which then condenses with a second IPP to form the C₁₅ isoprenoid, farnesyl diphosphate (FPP; compound 4 in Fig. 1). FPP then is used in a wide range of reactions including the formation of geranylgeranyl diphosphate (GGPP) (1), squalene (involved in cholesterol and ergosterol biosynthesis), dehydrosqualene (used in formation of the Staphylococcus aureus virulence factor staphyloxanthin) (2), undecaprenyl diphosphate (used in bacterial cell wall biosynthesis), and quinone and in heme a/o biosynthesis. FPP and GGPP also are used in protein (e.g., Ras, Rho, Rac) prenylation, and FPPS is an important target for the bisphosphonate class of drugs (used to treat bone resorption diseases) such as zoledronate (compound 5 in Fig. 1) (3). Bisphosphonates targeting FPPS have activity as antiparasitics (4), act as immunomodulators (activating γδ T cells containing the Vγ2Vδ2 T-cell receptor) (5), and switch macrophages from an M2 (tumor-promoting) to an M1 (tumor-killing) phenotype (6). They also kill tumor cells (7) and inhibit angiogenesis (8). However, the bisphosphonates in clinical use (zoledronate, alendronate, risedronate, ibandronate, etidronate, and clodronate) are very hydrophilic and bind avidly to bone mineral (9). Therefore, there is interest in developing less hydrophilic species (10) that might have better activity against tumors in soft tissues and better antibacterial (11) and antiparasitic activity.Open in a separate windowFig. 1.Chemical structures of FPPS substrates, products, and inhibitors.The structure of FPPS (from chickens) was first reported by Tarshis et al. (12) and revealed a highly α-helical fold. The structures of bacterial and Homo sapiens FPPS (HsFPPS) are very similar; HsFPPS structure (13, 14) is shown in Fig. 2A. There are two substrate-binding sites, called here “S1” and “S2.” S1 is the allylic (DMAPP, GPP) binding site to which bisphosphonates such as zoledronate bind via a [Mg²⁺]₃ cluster (15) (Fig. 2B). S2 is the homoallylic site to which IPP binds, Fig. 2B. Recently, Jahnke et al. (10) and Salcius et al. (16) discovered a third ligand-binding site called the “allosteric site” (hereafter the “A site”). A representative zoledronate+A-site inhibitor structure [Protein Data Bank (PDB) ID code 3N46] (Nov_980; compound 6 in Fig. 1) showing zoledronate in S1 and Nov_980 (compound 6) in the A site is shown in a stereo close-up view in Fig. 2B, superimposed on a zoledronate+IPP structure (PDB ID code 2F8Z) in S2. Whether the allosteric site serves a biological function (e.g., in feedback regulation) has not been reported. Nevertheless, highly potent inhibitors (IC₅₀ ∼80 nM) have been developed (10), and the best of these newly developed inhibitors are far more hydrophobic than are typical bisphosphonates (∼2.4–3.3 for cLogP vs. ∼−3.3 for zoledronate) and are expected to have better direct antitumor effects in soft tissues (10).Open in a separate windowFig. 2.Structures of human FPPS. (A) Structure of HsFPPS showing zoledronate (compound 5) and IPP (compound 1) bound to the S1 (allylic) and S2 (homoallylic) ligand-binding sites (PDB ID code 2F8Z). (B) Superposition of the IPP-zoledronate structure (PDB ID code 2F8Z) on the zoledronate-Nov_980 A-site inhibitor structure (PDB ID code 3N46). Zoledronate binds to the allylic site S1, IPP binds to the homoallylic site S2, and the allosteric site inhibitor binds to the A site. Active-site “DDXXD” residues are indicated, as are Mg²⁺ molecules (green and yellow spheres, respectively). The views are in stereo.In our group we also have developed more lipophilic compounds (e.g., compound 7 in Fig. 1) (17, 18) as antiparasitic (19) and anticancer drug leads (18) and, using computational methods, have discovered other novel nonbisphosphonate FPPS inhibitors (e.g., compound 8 in Fig. 1) that have micromolar activity against FPPS (20). In this study, we extended our computational work and tried to discover other FPPS inhibitors that target the A site. Such compounds would be of interest because they might potentiate the effects of zoledronate and other bisphosphonates, as reported for other FPPS inhibitors (21), and have better tissue distribution properties in general.