自体肋软骨移植构建鼻尖软骨复合体在鼻整形中的应用效果

目的 探究自体肋软骨移植构建鼻尖软骨复合体在鼻整形中的应用效果。方法 选取2021年 1月-2022年6月我院收治的150例鼻整形患者作为研究对象，随机分为对照组及研究组，每组75例。对照 组单纯利用膨体聚四氟乙烯假体，研究组进行自体肋软骨移植构建鼻尖软骨复合体，比较两组手术前后 的鼻尖突出度、创面愈合时间、愈合程度、不良反应发生情况以及整形满意度。结果 研究组创面愈合时 间短于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；研究组术后鼻尖突出度高于对照组，差异有统计学意义 （P＜0.05）；研究组不良反应发生率低于对照组，愈合程度优于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）； 研究组整形满意度评分高于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论 自体肋软骨移植构建鼻尖软骨 复合体在鼻整形中的应用效果较好，能够呈现出较为自然的鼻形状态，患者认可度更高。     

自体肋软骨移植构建鼻尖软骨复合体在鼻整形中的应用

的 探讨予以鼻整形手术患者自体肋软骨移植构建鼻尖软骨复合体治疗的临床价值。方法 选 取2021年4月-2022年10月于南昌诺颜医疗美容医院行鼻整形手术的200例患者为研究对象，通过奇偶法 分为试验组和对照组，每组100例。试验组采用自体肋软骨移植构建鼻尖软骨复合体，对照组采用常规 材料复合体，比较两组鼻部美学角度测量值、患者满意度及并发症发生率。结果 试验组鼻唇角、鼻面 角、额鼻角水平均高于对照组（P＜0.05）；两组鼻背高度比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；试验组 鼻部外形、鼻部高度及整体满意度评分均高于对照组（P＜0.05）；试验组并发症发生率为3.00%，低于 对照组的13.00%（P＜0.05）。结论 将自体肋软骨移植构建鼻尖软骨复合体用于鼻整形手术中的效果较为 理想，可有效改善鼻部形态，且患者满意度高，不良反应少。     

Comparing definitive unilateral cleft rhinoplasty with and without diced-cartilage alar-base augmentation: A retrospective cohort study

This retrospective cohort study aimed to compare the long-term aesthetic outcomes and satisfaction of patients who underwent two techniques of definitive unilateral cleft rhinoplasty. The two cohorts, comprising patients with mature unilateral cleft deformity, were managed with definitive rhinoplasty, either with or without diced-cartilage alar-base and peri-alar augmentation (ABPA). Thirty patients were included in each cohort. Anthropometric measurements, complications, patient satisfaction scores, and third-party surgeon assessment scores were reviewed. In both cohorts, anthropometric parameters improved. Rhinoplasty with ABPA was the superior cohort in terms of columellar length (10.3 ± 1.0 in the cohort with ABPA, compared with 7.9 ± 0.6 in the cohort without ABPA; p < 0.001), alar-base angle (0.2 ± 0.2, compared with 4.3 ± 0.3; p < 0.001), and columellar deviation (2.5 ± 1.4, compared with 10.3 ± 2.1; p < 0.001). This cohort also had more symmetry in nostril height and nostril width (p < 0.001), a lower recurrence rate (one case compared with 22 cases; p < 0.001), a higher patient satisfaction score (p = 0.002), and a higher surgeon assessment score (p < 0.001, Cronbach’s alpha = 0.706, Kendall’s coefficient of concordance = 0.787). Within the limitations of this study, it appears that the described technique for augmenting the alar-base and peri-alar maxillary area is manageable, and yields consistent long-term results.