Nursing diagnosis taxonomy across the Atlantic Ocean: congruence between nurses' charting and the NANDA taxonomy

Nursing diagnosis taxonomy across the Atlantic Ocean: congruence between nurses' charting and the NANDA taxonomy Purpose and aims . The purpose of this study was to analyse expressions or terms used by nurses in Iceland to describe patient problems. The classification of NANDA was used as reference. The research questions were: (a) Does NANDA terminology represent patient problems documented by Icelandic nurses? (b) If so, what kind of nursing diagnoses does it represent? (c) What kind of patient problems are not represented by NANDA terminology? (d) What are the most frequent nursing diagnoses used? Methods. A retrospective chart review was conducted in a 400 bed acute care hospital in Iceland. The sample was defined as nursing diagnosis statements in charts of patients hospitalized in two 6‐month periods in two separate years. The data were analysed according to a predefined grading system based on the PES format or Problem – (A)aetiology – Signs and symptoms. Results. A total of 1217 charts were used for the study, which yielded 2171 nursing diagnoses statements for analysis. Charts with at least one nursing diagnosis documented were 60·1% and the number of diagnoses per patient ranged from 0 to 10, with 65% of charts with three diagnoses or less. The number of diagnoses correlated with patients' length of stay, but not with increased age of the patients. The average number of statements per patient was 3·28. Almost 60% of the diagnoses were according to NANDA terminology, another 20% were stated as procedures, medical diagnoses or risks for complications. The 20 most frequently used nursing diagnoses accounted for 80% of all diagnoses documented. Discrepancy between nurses' documentation on emotional problems and availability of diagnosis in the NANDA taxonomy was evident. Conclusion. It can be concluded that the NANDA taxonomy seems to be culturally relevant for nurses in different cultures.     

Evaluation in the design of health information systems: application of approaches emerging from usability engineering

This paper examines the role of evaluation in the design of health care information systems. A framework is presented for considering evaluation in the context of software development processes, in particular, the systems development life cycle (SDLC). Variations on standard design methodologies are then discussed, including methods based on rapid development and continual evaluation of prototype systems. Usability testing is presented as a key method for conducting evaluations during iterative system development. The emergence of design methodologies, where evaluation is viewed as a central part of the development cycle is also discussed. Evaluation methodologies are then considered along a continuum, ranging from studies involving a high degree of experimental control to observational approaches. A full cycle approach to evaluation of health care systems is argued for, involving deployment of new methods across the SDLC. Implications for future work exploring the integration of design and evaluation processes in health informatics are discussed.     

Parallel Cascade Recognition of Exon and Intron DNA Sequences

Many of the current procedures for detecting coding regions on human DNA sequences combine a number of individual techniques such as discriminant analysis and neural net methods. Recent papers have used techniques from nonlinear systems identification, in particular, parallel cascade identification (PCI), as one means for classifying protein sequences into their structure/function groups. In the present paper, PCI is used in a pilot study to distinguish exon (coding) from intron (noncoding; interspersed within genes) human DNA sequences. Only the first exon and first intron sequences with known boundaries in genomic DNA from the T-cell receptor locus were used for training. Then, the parallel cascade classifiers were able to achieve classification rates of about 89% on novel sequences in a test set, and averaged about 82% when results of a blind test were included. In testing over a much wider range of human nucleotide sequences, PCI classifiers averaged 83.6% correct classifications. These results indicate that parallel cascade classifiers may be useful components in future coding region detection programs. © 2002 Biomedical Engineering Society. PAC2002: 8715Cc, 8714Gg, 8715Aa     

Detection of marginal defects of composite restorations with conventional and digital radiographs

The purpose of this study was to determine the validity of detecting approximal imperfections of composite fillings using three intraoral radiographic systems in vitro. Class II composite resin restorations (108) with three radiopacities (264, 306, 443% Al 99.5) of which 27 had marginal openings or overhangs, respectively, were conventionally (Ektaspeed plus) and digitally (Dexis, Digora) radiographed. Images were assessed by 10 observers for the presence of marginal gaps and overhangs, as well as for their need of restorative treatment according to a five-point confidence rating scale. The validity of the observations were expressed as areas under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (Aroc). Repeated measures analysis of variance revealed significant effects of 'radiographic system' and 'diagnostic purpose'. Marginal overhangs (Aroc = 0.90) were significantly easier to diagnose than openings (Aroc = 0.63). Marginal gaps were better detected on conventional and Dexis radiographs than on Digora images. the range of sensitivities and specificities of the treatment decision was 0.53-0.56 and 0.87-0.88, respectively. It was concluded that the validity of detecting marginal defects of composite resin restorations based on radiographs was only slightly affected by the radiographic system being used. The diagnosis of marginal gaps frequently resulted in false-positive and false-negative decisions.     

Seeing need and developing care: exploring knowledge for and from practice

The use and creation of knowledge by practitioners is complex. There is a contemporary emphasis on the implementation of knowledge, or evidence, derived from outside the immediate practice environment. However, there is also an appreciation of the context-specific nature of practitioner knowledge that they use to inform patient care, and that is derived from their intimate contact with patients. This paper described one study that sought to analyse the impact of developments in practice on the wider professional and organisational community. Three case study sites were identified through a multidimensional sampling matrix, and interviews conducted with 41 practitioners of various organisational positions and professions. The primacy of context-specific, or proximal knowledge was highlighted, together with a manipulation of evidence and policy to fit understandings of local patient need.     

Trauma care systems in India

Trauma-care systems in India are at a nascent stage of development. Industrialised cities, rural towns and villages coexist, with almost complete lack of organised trauma care. There is gross disparity between trauma services available in various parts of the country. Rural India has inefficient services for trauma care, due to the varied topography, financial constraints and lack of appropriate health infrastructure. There is no national lead agency to co-ordinate various components of a trauma system. No mechanism for accreditation of trauma centres and professionals exists. Education in trauma life-support (TLS) skills has only recently become available. A nation-wide survey encompassing various facilities has demonstrated significant deficiencies in current trauma systems.Although injury is a major public-health problem, the Government of India has failed to recognise it as a priority. Significant efforts to develop trauma-care systems across the country are seen mainly in the private sector. New initiatives under National Health Policy 2002 are expected to result in improvement in the systems, but the allocation of funds remains grossly inadequate for any significant impact on the outcome.     

Is terminology used effectively to convey diagnostic certainty in radiology reports?

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: This study was performed to assess the extent of agreement among radiologists and nonradiologists in perception of diagnostic certainty conveyed by words and phrases commonly used in radiology reports. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was performed in a large academic radiology department. To determine the commonly used terminology for conveying diagnostic certainty in radiology reports, 12 randomly selected radiologists from six different subspecialties were interviewed. The authors identified the 15 most commonly used words and phrases and included these in random order in a questionnaire sent to all staff radiologists (n = 45) and to 158 referring physicians. Physicians were asked to rank the 15 phrases in order of the diagnostic certainty conveyed by each, from 1 (most certain) to 15 (least certain), using each number only once. The kappa statistic was used to assess agreement in rank order among physicians. RESULTS: The questionnaire response rate was 76% (n = 34) for radiologists and 49% (n = 78) for nonradiologists. There was excellent agreement among radiologists (kappa = 0.95) and nonradiologists (kappa = 0.93) in the rank order for the phrase diagnostic of. Although there was good agreement (kappa = 0.45) among radiologists for the word unlikely, agreement among nonradiologists was poor (kappa = 0.27). There was very poor agreement among all physicians for the rank order of the other 13 phrases. CONCLUSION: Among radiologists and nonradiologists, concordance was poor regarding the diagnostic certainty associated with phrases commonly used in radiology reports. Because poor agreement could lead to suboptimal quality of care, the standardization of terminology would benefit all parties.     

Performance of Web-based image distribution: client-oriented measurements

The aim of this study was to define a clinically suitable personal computer (PC) configuration for Web-based image distribution and to assess the influence of different hard- and software configurations on the performance. Through specially developed software the time-to-display (TTD) for various PC configurations was measured. Different processor speeds, random access memory (RAM), screen resolutions, graphic adapters, network speeds, operating systems and examination types (computed radiography, CT, MRI) were evaluated, providing more than half a million measurements. Processor speed was the most relevant factor for the TTD; doubling the speed halved the TTD. Under processor speeds of 350 MHz, TTD mostly remained above 5 s for 1 CR or 16 CT images. Here Windows NT with lossy compression were superior. Processor speeds of 350 MHz and over delivered TTD <5 s. In this case Windows 2000 and lossless compression were preferable. Screen resolutions above 1280×1024 pixels increased the TTD mainly for CR images. The RAM amount, network speed and graphic adapter did not have a significant influence. The minimum threshold for clinical routine is any standard off-the-shelf PC better than Pentium II 350 MHz, 128 MB RAM; hence, high-end PC hardware is not required.     

Assessing the long-term effect of educational reminder messages on primary care radiology referrals

AIM: To investigate whether the effect of educational reminder messages for knee and lumbar spine radiographs varied over a 12 month period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a previous randomized, controlled trial, educational reminder messages attached to x-ray reports were shown to be effective in reducing the number of radiograph requests by general practitioners for knee and lumbar spine radiographs. In this study, all radiology departments from the previous trial were asked for monthly referral records for the 12 month intervention period for knee and lumbar spine radiographs for each general practice. Poisson regression was used to test for a change over time in the number of referrals between control and intervention practices. RESULTS: Data were obtained for 66% of the general practices in the main trial. The number of referrals for both knee and lumbar spine radiographs remained consistently and statistically significantly lower in the educational reminder messages group compared with the control group (relative risk=0.65 and 0.64, respectively). There was no evidence that this difference increased or decreased throughout the 12 month period. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of educational reminder messages was produced as soon as the intervention was delivered and maintained throughout the intervention period. There was no evidence of the effect of the intervention wearing off.