护理干预对心内科住院患者睡眠质量的临床效果观察

目的 探讨护理干预对心内科住院患者睡眠质量的临床效果.方法 收集心内科住院高血压患者90例,随机分为治疗组和对照组各45例,采用国际通用的匹兹堡睡眠质量指数及调查表进行评分及调查.结果 护理干预后,治疗组在主观睡眠质量、入睡时间、睡眠时间、睡眠效率、睡眠障碍、睡眠药物运用、日间功能障碍各项均优于对照组(P＜0.05);治疗组的收缩压与舒张压均优于对照组(P＜0.05).结论 医护人员对高血压患者进行常规药物治疗时,应注重改善患者睡眠质量,积极干预影响睡眠的危险因素.     

Aggressive systolic blood pressure control in older subjects: benefits and risks

Systolic hypertension, especially isolated systolic hypertension (ISH) is very common in older subjects aged ≥ 65 years and is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD), strokes, heart failure (HF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). It is also, directly and linearly related with these complications irrespective of sex, or ethnicity, but it is worse with the advancement of age. Effective control of systolic blood pressure (SBP), is associated with significant reduction in the incidence of these complications. Currently, there is a debate about the optimal SBP control in view of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) showing beneficial cardiovascular (CV) effects of intensive SBP of < 120 mmHg in older patients. Also, the recently released blood pressure (BP) guidelines by the American College of Cardiology, the American Heart Association and the American Society of Hypertension (ACC/AHA/ASH) recommend a SBP reduction of < 130 mmHg. These SBP treatment recommendations are in contrast with the current (JNC VIII) committee of BP treatment guidelines, which recommend a SBP reduction < 150 mmHg for the same age of patients. All these different recommendations have created a debate regarding the optimal treatment targets for the systolic hypertension of the elderly patients. To gain more information a focused Medline search was conducted from 2010 to 2017 using the terms, systolic blood pressure, aggressive control, older subjects, treatment guidelines, and 37 pertinent papers were retrieved. The findings from these studies suggest a SBP reduction of < 140 mm Hg for persons aged ≥ 60 years, with an attempt for SBP reduction to ≤130 mm Hg in healthier subjects and hose with CVD, DM, and CKD. Care should be taken not to further reduce the SBP in older subjects if their DBP is ≤60 mmHg for the fear of J-curve effect.     

肺泡表面活性物质联合鼻塞式持续气道正压通气治疗早产儿肺透明膜病的应用研究

目的 分析早产儿肺透明膜病经肺泡表面活性物质联合鼻塞式持续气道正压通气治疗的效果。方法 选取黄山市人民医院2014年11月-2017年11月收治的肺透明膜病早产儿50例,依据不同治疗方法分为两组,24例施予鼻塞式持续气道正压通气治疗者为对照组,26例予以肺泡表面活性物质联合鼻塞式持续气道正压通气治疗者为试验组,比较两组血气分析指标、呼吸力学与并发症发生情况。结果 治疗后,试验组血氧饱和度(SpO₂)、血氧分压(PaO₂)、二氧化碳分压(PaCO₂)、氢离子浓度指数(pH)优于对照组,且试验组呼吸时间常数(RCexp)、呼气峰流量(PEF)均较对照组高,差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05);试验组并发症发生率为低于对照组(7.69% vs. 28.00%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 通过肺泡表面活性物质联合鼻塞式持续气道正压通气治疗早产儿肺透明病,可有效改善其血气分析指标,并提升RCexp、PEF,达到减少并发症、改善预后的效果,值得推广。     

内路小梁切开联合白内障超声乳化吸除术治疗原发性开角型青光眼的短期疗效

目的 对比内路小梁切开联合白内障超声乳化吸除术和单纯内路小梁切开术治疗合并白内障的原发性开角型青光眼（primary open angle glaucoma，POAG）的早期手术效果和并发症。设计 病例对照研究。研究对象2018年3月至2019年3月在北京同仁眼科中心住院手术治疗的合并白内障的POAG患者36例（36眼）。方法 根据患者选择的手术方式，将患者分为两组：行内路小梁切开联合白内障超声乳化吸除术的POAG患者12例（12眼）为观察组，行内路小梁切开术的POAG患者24例（24眼）为对照组。记录并比较两组患眼术前、术后1、2、3、5天、1周、1个月时眼压、视力、并发症和使用降眼压药的种类。主要指标 眼压、视力、并发症和降眼压药物种类。结果 观察组和对照组术前最高眼压分别为（34.08±8.21）mmHg和（37.75±8.61）mmHg（P=0.46）,观察组术后第1天、1周、1个月的平均眼压分别为（20.75±11.89）mmHg、（21.23±8.72）mmHg、（15.00±2.22） mmHg，对照组术前、术后第1天、1周、1个月的平均眼压分别为（16.08±5.63）mm Hg、（22.08±11.48）mmHg、（16.05±5.25）mmHg，两组术后眼压整体变化趋势随时间降低（P<0.001）,两组间术后眼压波动虽然存在差异，但是无统计学意义（P=0.77）。观察组和对照组术后1个月降眼压幅度分别为53.09%±15.19%和55.68%±15.63%（P=0.64）。观察组和对照组术前降眼压药物使用种类分别为（2.67±0.99） 种和（3.08±0.72）种（P=0.16），术后1个月时分别下降至（0.17±0.58）种和（0.96±1.33）种（P=0.06）。观察组和对照组组术后眼压反跳发生率分别为16.67%和54.17%（P=0.03）。前房积血为术后最常见的并发症, 观察组发生率为83.3%，对照组为62.5%（P=0.21)。观察组和对照组睫状体脱离发生率分别为25.0%和75.0%（P=0.004）。观察组中，8眼（66.7%）术后生活视力提高，4眼（33.3%）视力恢复至术前水平，0眼视力降低；对照组中，20眼（83.3%）术后生活视力恢复至术前水平，4眼（16.7%）视力降低（P<0.001）。结论 对于合并白内障的开角型青光眼患者，内路小梁切开联合白内障超声乳化吸除术和单纯内路小梁切开术在术后1个月时降眼压作用相似。联合手术术后视力改善明显，眼压反跳发生率较单纯内路小梁切开术低，是一种安全有效的手术方式，远期效果有待进一步观察。