网络资源平台在泌尿外科学教学中的应用

介绍了国内外泌尿外科网络资源，分析实施泌尿外科网络教学存在的问题并提出对策。     

Emergency department visits involving opioids in Connecticut, 2011–2015

Background: Opioid abuse has demonstrated an unwavering elevation in the past decade. This study examined emergency department (ED) utilization for this growing public health problem in the state of Connecticut.

Methods: We evaluated the ED discharges involving opioids in individuals treated in Connecticut EDs from 2011 to 2015. International Classification of Disease, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification and external cause of injury codes were used to identify cases.

Results: There were 38,003 ED visits involving opioids during the study period. Visits were most prevalent in males (63.4%) and in those aged 18–44 years (71.8%). The rate of visits (per 10,000 ED visits) in whites (72.7) was more than three times that of blacks (24.7) and nearly double that of individuals of Hispanic ethnicity (37.7). The rate of visits for females under the age of 18 was slightly greater than that for males in the same age groups (2.7 vs. 2.4/10,000 ED visits, respectively).

Conclusion: Manual labor work and racial stereotyping are possible causal factors for higher rates of opioid-related ED visits among white males between the ages of 18 and 44, while higher levels of emotional distress may be contributing to similar rates among females under the age of 18 and over the age of 65.     

Review of non‐invasive ventilation in the emergency department: clinical considerations and management priorities

Aims and objectives. We aimed to synthesise evidence from published literature on non‐invasive ventilation to inform nurses involved in the clinical management of non‐invasive ventilation in the emergency department. Background. Non‐invasive ventilation is a form of ventilatory support that does not require endotracheal intubation and is used in the early management of acute respiratory failure in emergency departments. Safe delivery of this intervention requires a skilled team, educated and experienced in appropriate patient selection, available devices and monitoring priorities. Design. Systematic review. Method. A multi‐database search was performed to identify works published in the English language between 1998–2008. Search terms included: non‐invasive ventilation, continuous positive airway pressure and emergency department. Inclusion and exclusion criteria for the review were identified and systematically applied. Results. Terminology used to describe aspects of non‐invasive ventilation is ambiguous. Two international guidelines inform the delivery of this intervention, however, much research has been undertaken since these publications. Strong evidence exists for non‐invasive ventilation for patients with acute exacerbation of congestive heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Non‐invasive ventilation may be delivered with various interfaces and modes; little evidence is available for the superiority of individual interfaces or modes. Conclusions. Early use of non‐invasive ventilation for the management of acute respiratory failure may reduce mortality and morbidity. Though international guidelines exist, specific recommendations to guide the selection of modes, settings or interfaces for various aetiologies are lacking due to the absence of empirical evidence. Relevance to clinical practice. Monitoring of non‐invasive ventilation should focus on assessment of response to treatment, respiratory and haemodynamic stability, patient comfort and presence of air leaks. Complications are related to mask‐fit and high air flows; serious complications are few and occur infrequently. The use of non‐invasive ventilation has resource implications that must be considered to provide effective and safe management in the emergency department.     

急诊护患纠纷发生的主要原因及防范措施

探讨如何防范护患纠纷,并减少纠纷的发生。通过对急诊科常见护患纠纷产生的原因进行分析,并制定相应的防范措施,预防和减少了护患纠纷的发生。增强责任意识和服务意识,改善服务态度,提升服务质量,加强业务素质培训及法律知识培训,对减少护患纠纷的发生具有重要的临床意义。     

Diagnostic accuracy,yield, and comparative effectiveness of whole-body computed tomography in blunt trauma: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives:Controversies emerge over routine performances of whole-body computed tomography (WBCT) in patients with blunt polytrauma. The existing randomized and non-randomized evidence is inconclusive, and during observations of non-trauma, incidental findings, detected by WBCT, have left uncertainty regarding their consequences and optimal management. Additionally, previous meta-analyses have failed to address the limitations of primary studies and issues associated with incidental findings. Therefore, we planned a new systematic review to address these points.Methods:We will search the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central databases from inception to December 31, 2020, with no language restriction and perform full-text evaluation of potentially relevant articles. We will include prospective and retrospective studies with a single-gate design that assessed diagnostic accuracy and/or yield of WBCT to detect traumatic injuries, and studies that assessed incidental findings detected by WBCT. Additionally, we will include randomized controlled trials and non-randomized comparative studies that assessed the effectiveness of WBCT against conventional care, including selective computed tomography (CT). Studies of patients of all ages with blunt traumatic injuries, assessed at an emergency department, will be included. Two reviewers will extract data and rate the study validity via standard quality assessment tools. The primary outcome of interest will be reduction in mortality. Our secondary outcomes will include diagnostic accuracy and yield, detection of incidental findings and clinical outcomes associated with these detections, and improvement in other non-mortality clinical outcomes. We will qualitatively assess study, patient, and intervention characteristics and clinical outcomes. If appropriate, we will perform random-effects model meta-analyses to obtain summary estimates. Finally, we will assess the certainty of evidence by the grading the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.Ethics and dissemination:Ethics approval is not applicable, as this is a secondary analysis of publicly available data. The review results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals.Prospero registration:CRD42020187852.     

High-fidelity simulation is associated with good discriminability in emergency medicine residents’ in-training examinations

In-training examinations (ITEs), arranged during residency training, evaluate the residents’ performances periodically. There is limited literature focusing on the effectiveness of resident ITEs in the format of simulation-based examinations, as compared to traditional oral or written tests. Our primary objective is to investigate the effectiveness and discriminative ability of high-fidelity simulation compared with other measurement formats in emergency medicine (EM) residency training program.This is a retrospective cohort study. During the 5-year study period, 8 ITEs were administered to 68 EM residents, and 253 ITE measurements were collected. Different ITE scores were calculated and presented as mean and standard deviation. The ITEs were categorized into written, oral, or high-fidelity simulation test forms. Discrimination of ITE scores between different training years of residency was examined using a one-way analysis of variance test.The high-fidelity simulation scores correlated to the progression of EM training, and residents in their fourth training year (R4) had the highest scores consistently, followed by R3, R2, and then R1. The oral test scores had similar results but not as consistent as the high-fidelity simulation tests. The written test scores distribution failed to discriminate the residents’ seniority. The high-fidelity simulation test had the best discriminative ability and better correlation between different EM residency training years comparing to other forms.High-fidelity simulation tests had the good discriminative ability and were well correlated to the EM training year. We suggest high-fidelity simulation should be a part of ITE in training programs associated with critical or emergency patient cares.     

Medical scribes have no impact on the patient experience of an emergency department

Objective

We aimed to evaluate patient perceptions of medical scribes in the ED and to test for scribe impacts on ED Net Promoter Scores, Press Ganey Surveys and other patient‐centred topics.

Methods

Exploratory semi‐structured interviews were conducted in the ED during wait times after scribed consultations. Interview results were used to derive topics relating to scribes. Items addressing these topics from validated surveys were combined with items from widely used patient satisfaction questionnaires. Questionnaires were administered in the ED by face‐to‐face approach while patients were waiting for admission/discharge or test results. Patients and doctors were blinded to the purpose of the questionnaire. The survey evaluated for non‐inferiority of scribed consultations, using Net Promoter Scores, Press Ganey questions and questions specific to the presence of the scribe.

Results

Patient interviews did not identify any negative views regarding the presence of scribes during consultations. Thematic saturation was achieved after seven interviews. Two hundred and fifty‐eight patients were approached to complete the questionnaire, and 215 participated (83%); 95 and 118 participants in the scribed and non‐scribed groups, respectively. There was no difference between scribed and non‐scribed consultations on the following measures of satisfaction: the Net Promoter Score, Press Ganey questions, quality of information received from doctors, communication, privacy concerns or inhibition about revealing private information and room crowding.

Conclusion

We found no evidence that scribes reduce patient satisfaction during emergency consultations, nor prompt discomfort that might cause a patient to withhold information.