Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Korean fibromyalgia impact questionnaire in women patients with fibromyalgia for clinical research

Our aim was to translate and cross-culturally adapt the fibromyalgia impact questionnaire into Korean (KFIQ), and then evaluate its reliability and validity. The FIQ was translated into Korean by three translators and then independently translated back into English by three different translators. A total of 62 women patients with fibromyalgia (FM) were studied for the psychometric properties of the KFIQ. The mean age of the patients was 47.1 (25-73) years, and all were female. The mean KFIQ score was 48.3 (17-91), and the mean Korean health assessment questionnaire (KHAQ) score was 0.4 (0-1.7). The test-retest reliability of the KFIQ yielded an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.85 (0.53-0.96). For the construct validity, the Spearman rank correlations of KFIQ with patient global assessments using visual analog scale (pain, 0.58; morning stiffness, 0.45; fatigue, 0.48; depression, 0.43; anxiety, 0.56; global well-being, 0.46; disease severity, 0.49; impact on life, 0.51), KHAQ (0.44), and tender points (0.60) were high and statistically significant. The KFIQ might be a reliable and valid instrument for measuring health status and physical functioning in Korean women patients with FM, but needs further study.     

注意缺陷多动障碍诊断量表父母版的中国城市儿童常模制定及其信度和效度的检验

目的建立父母用注意缺陷多动障碍诊断量表(ADHDDS P)的中国城市儿童常模，并检验其信度和效度。 方法中南大学湘雅二院精神卫生研究所等单位于2004 08—2005 04在全国12个城市采样1616例(男777例，女839例)，年龄6~17(1110±280)岁，由父母填写ADHDDS P。 结果常模样本男性在注意缺陷、多动冲动分量表和总分都高于女性；注意缺陷分量表在各年龄之间差异无显著性意义，多动冲动分量表和总分6~8岁得分最高，随年龄增加而得分递减。信度：间隔4周量表总分的重测信度r=072;Crobachａ系数091;项目与总分的一致性r为061~071；父母和教师之间的一致性032。效度：与Conners父母症状问卷的多动指数(r=075)，CBCL的注意问题(r=065)、外化性问题(r=065)相关；ADHD儿童的得分显著高于常模组；以常模第93百分位作为划界分，对ADHD诊断的灵敏度为092，特异度为090。因子分析提取三因素模型：注意缺陷、多动和冲动。 结论ADHDDS常模分布存在年龄和性别差异，其信度效度达到心理测量学要求，可用于我国儿童ADHD辅助诊断。     

Simplified Chinese Version of the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score in Evaluating Patients with Metastatic Spinal Tumor: A Cross‐Cultural Adaptation and Validation

ObjectiveTo translate the original English version of the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) into simplified Chinese, adapt it cross‐culturally, validate its psychometric properties in measuring spinal instability in patients with metastatic spinal tumors in the Chinese mainland, examine the reliability and validity to demonstrate its accuracy and applicability in clinical practice.MethodsPatients diagnosed with metastatic spinal disease between January 2016 and January 2020 were recruited. The number of participants was advised to be at least 50 for appropriate analysis of reliability, construct validity, as well as ceiling or floor effects, and recruitment of 100 patients was advised for internal consistency analysis. The study was conducted in two phases: first, the SINS was translated into simplified Chinese; second, the factor structure, internal consistency, test–retest reliability, validity, and floor and ceiling effects of the SC‐SINS were assessed. The internationally recognized cross‐cultural adaptation guidelines were followed. Internal consistency was evaluated with Cronbach''s alpha. Test–retest reliability was examined among the patients with a 4‐week interval. The validity of the Chinese version of SINS (SC‐SINS) was assessed by examining its relationship with Kostuik classification. Principal component analysis was conducted to confirm the factor structure of each subscale.ResultsA total of 160 participants (88 males and 72 females) were enrolled. No major difficulties occurred in the forward and backward translations of SINS. The internal consistency of SC‐SINS was excellent (Cronbach''s α =0.857, ranging from 0.68 to 0.85). Test–retest reliability was also excellent with a value of 0.89, ranging from 0.86 to 0.95. Validity analyses indicated that the SC‐SINS was positively and significantly correlated with Kostuik classification. The correlation between “Posterolateral Involvement of Spinal Elements” and “1‐2 Partial Damage” was the highest with a correlation value of 0.792. The correlation between “Pain” and “1–2 Partial Damage” was the lowest with a value of 0.341. All items showed principal component coefficients greater than 0.4. The values of Factor 1 ranged from 0.523 to 0.681; Factor 2 ranged from 0.591 to 0.731; Factor 3 ranged from 0.613 to 0.754; Factor 4 ranged from 0.461 to 0.711; Factor 5 ranged from 0.513 to 0.701; and Factor 6 ranged from 0.501 to 0.668. In addition, neither floor nor ceiling effects were seen in the SC‐SINS.ConclusionThe SC‐SINS demonstrated high internal consistency and test–retest reliability, which has been proven valid and reliable to measure spinal stability in patients from the Chinese mainland with metastatic spinal tumor.     

采用CT影像学征象评估急性重症胰腺炎病情分级的可靠性研究

目的分析CT影像学征象评估急性重症胰腺炎病情分级的可靠性。方法选取本院2017年3月至2019年4月收治的89例急性重症胰腺炎患者的临床资料。根据病情情况分为轻度组49例,重度组40例,均进行CT检查。对患者所得图像进行分析,比较不同病情程度急性重症胰腺炎患者影像学表现、并发症情况以及CT分级与患者预后关系。结果轻度急性重症胰腺炎患者CT检查中出现胰腺体积增大、脂肪层模糊不清、单区域胰腺液潴留、多区域胰腺液潴留、气泡症、片状坏死情况均明显低于重度组(P<0.05);轻度组局部急性液体积囊、假性囊肿、胰腺坏死、胰腺囊肿、出血情况均低于重度组患者(P<0.05);根据CT分级分为轻中度组57例,重度组32例,轻中度组住院天数明显低于重度组,无死亡情况出现,重度组死亡率为12.50%(P<0.05)。结论 CT检查显示出急性重症胰腺炎患者病灶基本情况,通过影像学表现评估患者病情严重程度,有利于临床根据患者病情分级进行针对性治疗,可从临床评估患者预后中获益。     

慢性病患者生命质量测定量表体系之支气管哮喘量表的考评

目的 对慢性病患者生命质量测定量表体系之支气管哮喘(QLICD-BA)量表的测量学特性进行考评.方法 用QLICD-BA量表对100例支气管哮喘患者治疗前后分别进行调查,从而对量表的信度、效度和反应度进行评价.结果 除躯体功能、特异模块外,QLICD-BA量表有较好的重测信度;除特异模块外,该量表的内部一致性系数α、分半信度均在0.8以上;相关分析显示该量表有较好的结构效度和效标效度(SF-36为效标);该量表可以测出患者治疗前后各领域的生命质量变化.结论 QLICD-BA量表具有较好的信度、效度、反应度,可以作为我国哮喘患者生命质量的测评工具.     

心理创伤后应激障碍自评量表的编制和信度效度研究

目的　编制心理创伤后应激障碍自评量表 (PTSD— SS)并对其信度和效度进行检验。方法　以 DSM— 和CCMD— — R中 PTSD诊断标准为理论依据 ,应用心理测量和统计分析技术 ,筛选条目 ,并进行信度和效度检验。测度对象为遭受特大暴雨灾害和龙卷风袭击后的 136 5名青少年学生。结果　 PTSD— SS包括 2 4个条目 ,内部一致性系数 (Cronbach-α)为 0 .92 0 7,分半信度系数为 0 .95 39,再测信度系数为 0 .86 77。主成份因子分析揭示 PTSD— SS可概括为 3个因子 ,即重现 /回避症状、心理障碍 /功能受损和情感麻木 /紧张敏感。PTSD— SS与 SAS、SDS和 YSR评分呈显著正相关关系 ,相关系数分别为 0 .2 0 6 4、0 .35 36和 0 .2 0 6 2。结论　 PTSD— SS有较好的信度和效度 ,是一种理想的心理创伤后应激障碍评定工具     

大学生主观幸福感简表的编制和信效度研究

目的 编制大学生主观幸福感简表(subjective well-being simplify scale,SWBSS),检验其在大学生中的信效度.方法 抽取2374名大学生进行大学生主观幸福感简表(SWBSS)、幸福感指数(Index of Well-Being,IWB)、世界卫生组织生存质量简表(World Health of Organization Quality of Life Brief Scale,WHOQOL-BREF)、贝克抑郁自评问卷(Beck Depression Rating Scale,BDI)、焦虑自评量表(Self-rating Anxiety Scale,SAS)的测查.结果 ①探索性因素分析获得1个因子,解释总方差的41.768％.②验证性因素分析显示,模型的x2/df=2.208,RMR=0.016,RMSEA=0.032; GFI=0.986、AGFI=0.974、NFI=0.978、RFI=0.966、IFI=0.988、TLI=0.981、CFI=0.988,均大于0.900;PGFI=0.552、PNFI=0.639、PCFI=0.646,均大于0.500;建构信度=0.901,大于0.600.③量表的Cronbach's α系数为0.876,分半信度为0.817,间隔6周的重测信度为0.740(P＜0.01);主观幸福感分数与幸福感指数、生理领域、心理领域、社会领域、环境领域分数的相关系数分别为0.706,0.827,0.892,0.749,0.750(P ＜0.01),与BECK抑郁、自评焦虑的相关系数分别为-0.650、-0.580(P＜0.01).结论 大学生主观幸福感简表具有良好的同质信度、重测信度、建构信度、结构效度和效标效度,符合心理测量学的要求.     

Maslash工作倦怠量表通用版在护理人员中应用的信度与效度评价

目的对Maslach工作倦怠量表通用版（MBI-GS）在中国职业人群中的信度和效度进行验证。方法整群抽取某市省市级医院3所,从中随机抽取各临床科室和检验、放射等辅助科室护理人员319人作为样本。效度分析采用主成分因子分析、验证性因子分析、会聚效度和区分效度;选用同质性检验、重测信度和相关分析进行信度评价。结果因子分析表明MBI-GS的结构效度三因子模型优于单因子模型;量表及各维度的Cronbach’sα系数在0.672-0.874之间,量表总分与维度的相关系数在0.579-0.788之间（P〈0.01）,两次测量的量表相关系数为0.713（P〈0.01）,各维度相关系数大于0.666（P〈0.01）,说明该量表具有较好的同质性信度和重测信度。结论MBI-GS中文版经过适当修订可以作为中国护理人群工作倦怠比较理想的测量工具。     

The Malnutrition Screening Tool in Geriatric Rehabilitation: A Comparison of Validity When Completed by Health Professionals With and Without Malnutrition Screening Training Has Implications for Practice

Background

The validity of the Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST) in geriatric rehabilitation has been evaluated in a research environment but not in professional practice.