玻璃体腔注射雷珠单抗联合黄斑格栅样光凝治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿

目的：评估玻璃体腔注射雷珠单抗联合黄斑区格栅样光凝治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)的临床疗效。

方法： 前瞻性研究。纳入2016-10/2018-12在我院就诊的DME患者78例101眼,随机分为玻璃体腔注射雷珠单抗组(单纯注药组)38例49眼和玻璃体腔注射雷珠单抗联合黄斑格栅样光凝组(联合治疗组)40例52眼,随访12mo,对比分析两组患者最佳矫正视力(BCVA)与黄斑中心凹厚度(CRT)的变化,以及患者眼内注药次数。

结果：随访12mo末,联合治疗组与单纯注药组BCVA(LogMAR)(0.44±0.22 vs 0.55±0.23)与CRT(335.3±65.9 vs 370.4±84.4μm)有差异(P<0.05)。联合治疗组的平均注药次数少于单纯注药组(4.04±1.08 vs 5.83±1.92次,t=-5.722,P<0.05)。两组患者眼压(13.87±2.55 vs 14.04±2.69mmHg)无差异(P>0.05)。

结论：玻璃体腔注射雷珠单抗联合黄斑格栅样光凝可以有效治疗DME,减少眼内注药频次,是DME的一种优化治疗策略。     

玻璃体内注射雷珠单抗后视网膜分支静脉阻塞性黄斑水肿复发的危险因素分析

目的　探讨玻璃体内注射雷珠单抗后视网膜分支静脉阻塞（branch retinal vein occlusion,BRVO）性黄斑水肿复发的危险因素。方法　回顾性分析2013年1月至2018年1月在我院行玻璃体内注射雷珠单抗治疗BRVO性黄斑水肿患者的临床资料,记录患者的性别、年龄、眼别及术前的最佳矫正视力、眼压、病程、阻塞支分布情况、有无高血压病史、术前脉压差、术前黄斑中心凹厚度（central macular thickness,CMT）、有无联合视网膜激光光凝治疗,根据注射雷珠单抗的次数将患者分为单次注射组和复发组,比较两组之间术前基线资料的差异,运用Logistic回归分析探讨黄斑水肿复发的相关危险因素。结果　114例（114眼）纳入研究,其中单次注射组79例,复发组35例,两组相比,复发组的年龄、基线CMT均显著大于单次注射组（均为P<0.05）,其余指标两组间相比差异均无统计学意义（均为P>0.05）。Logistic回归分析结果显示,年龄、基线CMT是玻璃体内注射雷珠单抗后BRVO性黄斑水肿复发的危险因素（年龄:OR=1.080,P=0.01;CMT:OR=1.005,P＜0.01）。结论　年龄和基线CMT是黄斑水肿复发的主要危险因素,年龄越大、基线CMT越高的患者需重复注射雷珠单抗的风险越高。     

Single-site Baseline and Short-term Outcomes of Clinical Characteristics and Life Quality Evaluation of Chinese Wet Age-related Macular Degeneration Patients in Routine Clinical Practice

Background:

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of irreversible vision loss among the older population. In China, treatment of age-related ocular diseases is becoming a priority in eye care services. This study was to investigate the clinical characteristics and quality of life of Chinese patients with wet AMD and current treatment types, to evaluate short-term gains in different treatments, and to investigate associations between visual function and vision-related quality of life (VRQoL).

Methods:

A prospective, observational, noninterventional study was conducted. Basic data were collected from patients with clinical diagnoses of wet AMD before clinical assessments at baseline. VRQoL was measured with the Chinese version of the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (NEI VFQ-25). Correlations of the NEI VFQ-25 subscale scores with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and between-group differences were analyzed.

Results:

A total of 80 wet AMD patients were enrolled, with the mean age of 68.40 years. About one-quarter of wet AMD patients received intravitreal (IVT) ranibizumab treatment, and 67% of them were treated on a pro re nata basis. The visual acuity of patients treated with IVT ranibizumab at month 3 after treatment was significantly increased, whereas patients treated with traditional Chinese medicine achieved no significant improvement. Cronbach''s α for the NEI VFQ-25 subscales ranged from 0.697 to 0.843. Eight subscale and overall composite scores were moderately correlated with the BCVA of the better-seeing eye. Significant differences in the overall NEI VFQ-25 scores and other subscales were observed between patients with BCVA in the better-seeing eye of less than 50 letters and the others.

Conclusions:

Patients treated with IVT ranibizumab experienced better vision improvement at short-term follow-up. The Chinese version of the NEI VFQ-25 is a valid and reliable tool for assessing the VRQoL of Chinese wet AMD patients.     

雷珠单抗联合视网膜光凝治疗新生血管性青光眼的临床研究

目的：探讨雷珠单抗联合视网膜光凝治疗有视功能的新生血管性青光眼的临床疗效。
　　方法：回顾性分析2012-10/2013-09就诊于我院30例36眼有视功能的新生血管性青光眼采用雷珠单抗联合视网膜光凝治疗前及治疗后1 wk;1,3 mo的视力、眼压、虹膜表面新生血管消退情况及术中、术后并发症。
　　结果：采用雷珠单抗玻璃体腔注射后5d,36眼的虹膜表面新生血管全部消退,平均消退时间3.7±1.4d;治疗前平均眼压30.5±3.6mmHg,治疗后1wk;1,3mo的平均眼压分别是18.2±2.1,16.8±3.1,17.2±2.4mmHg,差异具有统计学意义;视力较治疗前无下降或有不同程度提高。术中均无眼内出血,术后无眼内炎等并发症发生。
　　结论：雷珠单抗联合视网膜光凝是治疗有视功能的新生血管性青光眼的一种安全、有效的方法。     

雷珠单抗治疗视网膜静脉阻塞继发黄斑水肿的效果及安全性的系统评价

目的 系统评价雷珠单抗治疗视网膜静脉阻塞继发黄斑水肿的效果及安全性.方法 计算机检索MEDLINE 、EMbase、Cochrane协作网眼和视力组数据库、CNKI、VIP、万方数据库及中国生物医学文献数据库中关于雷珠单抗治疗视网膜静脉阻塞继发黄斑水肿的随机对照试验,同时追索纳入文献的参考文献.检索时限均为从建库至2012年12月.在评价纳入研究由两人独立进行随机对照试验(RCT)的筛选、资料提取和质量评价后,采用RevMan 5.1软件进行Meta分析.结果 共纳入4个RCT.共1674只患眼.Meta分析结果显示:随访结束时,0.5 mg雷珠单抗组与安慰剂组比较,在最佳矫正视力和黄斑中心凹厚度方面,差异均有统计学意义[OR=12.21,95％CI:10.41～14.01;OR=223.93,95％CI:186.22～261.63;均P＜0.000 01];0.5 mg雷珠单抗组发生白内障的人数高于安慰剂组,但两组在发生眼内的炎症反应(虹膜睫状体炎、虹膜炎、玻璃体炎)、各种原因引起的青光眼、玻璃体积血和视网膜裂孔方面,差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).结论 现有临床研究证据提示,0.5 mg雷珠单抗组较安慰剂组治疗视网膜静脉阻塞继发黄斑水肿,更能有效地提高视力,减轻黄斑水肿,但雷珠单抗的使用也会增加白内障等并发症的发生率,但仍需更多高质量、大样本、长期的随机对照试验来验证其最佳剂量.     

雷珠单抗与康柏西普联合光动力疗法治疗息肉样脉络膜血管病变的疗效比较

目的:探索玻璃体腔注射雷珠单抗与康柏西普分别联合光动力疗法(PDT)治疗息肉样脉络膜血管病变(PCV)及对视力和血液流变学的影响。方法:前瞻性研究。纳入2017-02/2020-06我院收治的PCV患者120例120眼,根据随机数字表法分为雷珠单抗联合PDT治疗组61例61眼,康柏西普联合PDT治疗组59例59眼,比较两组患者治疗前后眼压、最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、中心视网膜厚度(CRT)、血液流动学,以及随访3mo期间并发症发生率。结果:两组患者治疗前,治疗后1、3mo的眼压、CRT、BCVA比较均无差异(均P>0.05),雷珠单抗联合PDT治疗组治疗后1、3mo的红细胞聚集指数、全血高切黏度、全血低切黏度均低于康柏西普联合PDT治疗组(均P<0.05)。雷珠单抗联合PDT治疗组随访3mo内并发症发生率低于康柏西普联合PDT治疗组(3.3%vs 16.9%,P<0.05)。结论:玻璃体腔注射雷珠单抗联合PDT治疗PCV,更利于血液流变学稳定,降低并发症发生率。     

雷珠单抗治疗早产儿视网膜病变对眼部生物学参数的影响

目的:探讨玻璃体腔注射雷珠单抗治疗早产儿视网膜病变(ROP)对眼部参数的影响,并分析其与出生体质量(BW)和矫正后年龄(PMA)的关系。方法:选取2016-01-01/2022-01-31于西北妇女儿童医院接受常规ROP筛查的早产儿98例,根据Retcam3眼底筛查结果分为ROP组(49例)和无ROP组(49例),其中ROP组患儿双眼均行玻璃体腔注射雷珠单抗治疗,平均治疗PMA为38.02±3.03周。两组患儿分别于PMA 0月(40周±14d)、PMA 3月(52周±28d)、PMA 6月(64周±28d)测量眼部参数。结果:PMA 0月时,ROP组和无ROP组患儿眼轴长度(AL)、前房深度(ACD)、晶状体厚度(LT)、玻璃体长度(VL)和中央角膜厚度(CCT)均无差异(P>0.05);PMA 3、6月时,ROP组患儿ACD均大于无ROP组,LT均小于无ROP组(P<0.05);PMA 6月时,ROP组患儿AL、VL均小于无ROP组(P<0.05)。ROP组和无ROP组患儿AL、ACD、VL与PMA呈正相关,CCT与PMA呈负相关;无ROP组患儿LT与PMA呈正相...     

雷珠单抗玻璃体腔注射联合复合式小梁切除术及PRP治疗NVG有效性的Meta分析

目的:系统评价雷珠单抗玻璃体腔注射联合复合式小梁切除及视网膜光凝术(PRP)与复合式小梁切除术联合PRP治疗新生血管性青光眼(NVG)的有效性和安全性。方法:检索万方数据库、中国知网(CNKI)、PubMed、EMbase、中国生物医学文献服务系统(CBM)、Clinicalkey、Cochrane Library数据库,查找自建库至2022-07-20试验组为雷珠单抗玻璃体腔注射联合复合式小梁切除术及PRP治疗NVG,对照组为复合式小梁切除术联合PRP治疗NVG的临床研究,同时查阅相关参考文献。提取最佳矫正视力、眼压、并发症发生情况、手术成功率进行分析。结果:本研究共纳入8篇临床研究,NVG患者864例864眼。Meta分析结果提示,试验组患者术后1wk, 1、3mo时眼压较对照组下降更低(术后1wk:MD=-4.00,95%CI:-4.62～-3.38,P<0.05;术后1mo:MD=-4.11,95%CI:-4.66～-3.56,P<0.05;术后3mo:MD=-4.58,95%CI:-5.61～-3.55,P<0.05);试验组患者术后1mo时最佳矫正视力优于...     

Persisent ocular hypertension following intravitreal ranibizumab

BACKGROUND: To describe the occurrence of ocular hypertension in four patients following injection of ranibizumab intravitreally. METHODS: Case series. RESULTS: Four patients had high intraocular pressure after intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5 mg. Ocular hypertension occurred 1 month after the second ranibizumab injection in patients 1 and 3, and 1 month after the first ranibizumab in patient 2. In patient 4, it occurred several hours after the first ranibizumab injection. In all patients, the IOP increase was sustained across several visits, requiring control with topical glaucoma therapy, and in two cases the addition of a systemic carbonic anhydrase inhibitor. None of the patients had a previous history of glaucoma, ocular hypertension or IOP asymmetry and the IOP was as high as 30, 34, 46, and 50 mmHg in the four patients. CONCLUSION: Severe and sustained ocular hypertension may occur after intravitreal ranibizumab. Although the mechanism of the pressure rise is unknown, all eyes in our series were controlled with medical therapy.